BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

152 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 2(47)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi1,148Mumbai1,019Ahmedabad333Jaipur251Bangalore237Indore152Pune134Raipur132Karnataka127Chennai112Kolkata106Hyderabad87Chandigarh78Rajkot50Surat46Visakhapatnam45Nagpur39Calcutta35Amritsar32Lucknow28Allahabad26Cochin26Patna20Agra18Kerala14Guwahati13Ranchi11Dehradun9Panaji8Cuttack7Jabalpur6Telangana4SC4Jodhpur2Varanasi1Rajasthan1

Key Topics

Section 271D184Section 271(1)(b)139Section 142(1)97Section 269S78Penalty76Section 14457Section 13254Section 26330Section 271(1)(c)

M/S KETI SANGAM INFRASTRUCTURE (I) LTD.,INDORE vs. THE DCIT (CENTRAL), INDORE

In the result, all the 12 appeals filed at the instance of

ITA 1341/IND/2016[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Indore27 Jun 2018AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Manish Borad

Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 271(1)(c)Section 274

47 Keti Sangam, etc. ITA Nos. 516/2017, 603/Ind/2016 etc. about its substantiation, the AO was not justified in imposing penalty under section 271AAA especially when offered undisclosed income has been accepted and due taxes thereon has been paid by the assessee. Order of the AO levying penalty was set aside, appeal favour of the assessee. Similarly penalty levied

M/S SHREE COAL ENTERPRISES (I) PVT. LTD.,BHOPAL vs. THE ACIT 3(1), BHOPAL

Showing 1–20 of 152 · Page 1 of 8

...
27
Addition to Income21
Disallowance18
Depreciation7

In the result, all the 12 appeals filed at the instance of

ITA 1337/IND/2016[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Indore27 Jun 2018AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Manish Borad

Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 271(1)(c)Section 274

47 Keti Sangam, etc. ITA Nos. 516/2017, 603/Ind/2016 etc. about its substantiation, the AO was not justified in imposing penalty under section 271AAA especially when offered undisclosed income has been accepted and due taxes thereon has been paid by the assessee. Order of the AO levying penalty was set aside, appeal favour of the assessee. Similarly penalty levied

M/S KETI SANGHAM INFRASTRUTURE (I) LIMITED,INDORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL), INDORE

In the result, all the 12 appeals filed at the instance of

ITA 516/IND/2017[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Indore22 Jun 2018AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Manish Borad

Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 271(1)(c)Section 274

47 Keti Sangam, etc. ITA Nos. 516/2017, 603/Ind/2016 etc. about its substantiation, the AO was not justified in imposing penalty under section 271AAA especially when offered undisclosed income has been accepted and due taxes thereon has been paid by the assessee. Order of the AO levying penalty was set aside, appeal favour of the assessee. Similarly penalty levied

GAURAV AJMERA,RATLAM vs. DCIT(CENTRAL)-2, INDORE

Accordingly, Ground No.2 raised by the Revenue is allowed

ITA 808/IND/2024[2017-2018]Status: DisposedITAT Indore25 Aug 2025AY 2017-2018

Bench: Shri B.M. Biyani & Shri Paresh M. Joshi

Section 115BSection 131Section 132(4)Section 132ASection 143(3)Section 234ASection 271ASection 274

47,59,000/- out of the admitted undisclosed income of Rs.49,99,000/-. Finally, the AO completed assessment u/s 143(3) whereby (i) he made a further addition of Rs.2,40,000/- being the difference of Rs.49,99,000/- surrendered but only Rs.47,59,000/- declared in return; (ii) invoked higher rate of tax u/s 115BBE to the entire income

THE ACIT -4(1), INDORE vs. SHRI MUKESH SANGLA, INDORE

Appeal is dismissed

ITA 1/IND/2021[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Indore11 Mar 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Mahavir Prasad & Shri Manish Boradvirtual Hearing Assessment Year:2010-11 Acit-4(1), Shri Mukesh Sangla, Indore बनाम/ Indore (Appellant) (Respondent ) Vs. P.A. No.Anaps5579F

Section 132Section 139Section 139(1)Section 153ASection 271(1)(c)Section 274

section 271(1)(c). 2. The Ld. CIT(A) was not justified in not considering that the assessee himself in reply to specific query on difference has admitted that he offered miscellaneous income of Rs. 11,01,00,000/- pursuant to search and seizure action u/s 132. 3. The Ld. CIT(A) was not justified in not considering that

VAISHALI SHIVHARE,GWALIOR vs. DCIT (CENTRAL)-1, BHOPAL

In the result, appeals of the assessee(s) in ITANo

ITA 376/IND/2018[11-12]Status: DisposedITAT Indore24 Jan 2019

Bench: Hon'Ble Kul Bharat & Hon'Ble Manish Borad

Section 132Section 142(1)Section 144Section 271(1)(b)

47 appeals are at the instance of assessees being aggrieved with the finding of Ld. CIT(A), confirming the levy of penalty of Rs.10,000/- u/s 271(1)(b) of the Act for non-complying to notice issued u/s 142(1) of the Act. We find that subsequent to the search u/s 132 of the Act at the premises

VAISHALI SHIVHARE,GWALIOR vs. DCIT (CENTRAL)-1, BHOPAL

In the result, appeals of the assessee(s) in ITANo

ITA 379/IND/2018[14-15]Status: DisposedITAT Indore24 Jan 2019

Bench: Hon'Ble Kul Bharat & Hon'Ble Manish Borad

Section 132Section 142(1)Section 144Section 271(1)(b)

47 appeals are at the instance of assessees being aggrieved with the finding of Ld. CIT(A), confirming the levy of penalty of Rs.10,000/- u/s 271(1)(b) of the Act for non-complying to notice issued u/s 142(1) of the Act. We find that subsequent to the search u/s 132 of the Act at the premises

SH. RAMSWAROOP SHIVHARE,GWALIOR vs. D.C.I.T., CENTRAL- 1, BHOPAL

In the result, appeals of the assessee(s) in ITANo

ITA 393/IND/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Indore24 Jan 2019AY 2014-15

Bench: Hon'Ble Kul Bharat & Hon'Ble Manish Borad

Section 132Section 142(1)Section 144Section 271(1)(b)

47 appeals are at the instance of assessees being aggrieved with the finding of Ld. CIT(A), confirming the levy of penalty of Rs.10,000/- u/s 271(1)(b) of the Act for non-complying to notice issued u/s 142(1) of the Act. We find that subsequent to the search u/s 132 of the Act at the premises

VAISHALI SHIVHARE,GWALIOR vs. DCIT (CENTRAL)-1, BHOPAL

In the result, appeals of the assessee(s) in ITANo

ITA 377/IND/2018[12-13]Status: DisposedITAT Indore24 Jan 2019

Bench: Hon'Ble Kul Bharat & Hon'Ble Manish Borad

Section 132Section 142(1)Section 144Section 271(1)(b)

47 appeals are at the instance of assessees being aggrieved with the finding of Ld. CIT(A), confirming the levy of penalty of Rs.10,000/- u/s 271(1)(b) of the Act for non-complying to notice issued u/s 142(1) of the Act. We find that subsequent to the search u/s 132 of the Act at the premises

PATEL EDUCATION AND WELFARE SOCIETY,INDORE vs. DCIT (CENTRAL)- !, BHOPAL

In the result, appeals of the assessee(s) in ITANo

ITA 354/IND/2018[12-13]Status: DisposedITAT Indore24 Jan 2019

Bench: Hon'Ble Kul Bharat & Hon'Ble Manish Borad

Section 132Section 142(1)Section 144Section 271(1)(b)

47 appeals are at the instance of assessees being aggrieved with the finding of Ld. CIT(A), confirming the levy of penalty of Rs.10,000/- u/s 271(1)(b) of the Act for non-complying to notice issued u/s 142(1) of the Act. We find that subsequent to the search u/s 132 of the Act at the premises

VAISHALI SHIVHARE,GWALIOR vs. DCIT (CENTRAL)-1, BHOPAL

In the result, appeals of the assessee(s) in ITANo

ITA 378/IND/2018[13-14]Status: DisposedITAT Indore24 Jan 2019

Bench: Hon'Ble Kul Bharat & Hon'Ble Manish Borad

Section 132Section 142(1)Section 144Section 271(1)(b)

47 appeals are at the instance of assessees being aggrieved with the finding of Ld. CIT(A), confirming the levy of penalty of Rs.10,000/- u/s 271(1)(b) of the Act for non-complying to notice issued u/s 142(1) of the Act. We find that subsequent to the search u/s 132 of the Act at the premises

M/S REGENT BEERS AND WINES LTD. ,INDORE vs. DCIT,CENTRAL-1, BHOPAL, BHOPAL

In the result, appeals of the assessee(s) in ITANo

ITA 349/IND/2018[14-15]Status: DisposedITAT Indore24 Jan 2019

Bench: Hon'Ble Kul Bharat & Hon'Ble Manish Borad

Section 132Section 142(1)Section 144Section 271(1)(b)

47 appeals are at the instance of assessees being aggrieved with the finding of Ld. CIT(A), confirming the levy of penalty of Rs.10,000/- u/s 271(1)(b) of the Act for non-complying to notice issued u/s 142(1) of the Act. We find that subsequent to the search u/s 132 of the Act at the premises

VAISHALI SHIVHARE,GWALIOR vs. DCIT (CENTRAL)-1, BHOPAL

In the result, appeals of the assessee(s) in ITANo

ITA 375/IND/2018[10-11]Status: DisposedITAT Indore24 Jan 2019

Bench: Hon'Ble Kul Bharat & Hon'Ble Manish Borad

Section 132Section 142(1)Section 144Section 271(1)(b)

47 appeals are at the instance of assessees being aggrieved with the finding of Ld. CIT(A), confirming the levy of penalty of Rs.10,000/- u/s 271(1)(b) of the Act for non-complying to notice issued u/s 142(1) of the Act. We find that subsequent to the search u/s 132 of the Act at the premises

PATEL EDUCATION AND WELFARE SOCIETY,INDORE vs. DCIT (CENTRAL)- !, BHOPAL

In the result, appeals of the assessee(s) in ITANo

ITA 356/IND/2018[14-15]Status: DisposedITAT Indore24 Jan 2019

Bench: Hon'Ble Kul Bharat & Hon'Ble Manish Borad

Section 132Section 142(1)Section 144Section 271(1)(b)

47 appeals are at the instance of assessees being aggrieved with the finding of Ld. CIT(A), confirming the levy of penalty of Rs.10,000/- u/s 271(1)(b) of the Act for non-complying to notice issued u/s 142(1) of the Act. We find that subsequent to the search u/s 132 of the Act at the premises

VAISHALI SHIVHARE,GWALIOR vs. DCIT (CENTRAL)-1, BHOPAL

In the result, appeals of the assessee(s) in ITANo

ITA 380/IND/2018[15-16]Status: DisposedITAT Indore24 Jan 2019

Bench: Hon'Ble Kul Bharat & Hon'Ble Manish Borad

Section 132Section 142(1)Section 144Section 271(1)(b)

47 appeals are at the instance of assessees being aggrieved with the finding of Ld. CIT(A), confirming the levy of penalty of Rs.10,000/- u/s 271(1)(b) of the Act for non-complying to notice issued u/s 142(1) of the Act. We find that subsequent to the search u/s 132 of the Act at the premises

SUNIT MADHOK,INDORE vs. DCIT,CENTRAL-1, , BHOPAL

In the result, appeals of the assessee(s) in ITANo

ITA 344/IND/2018[16-17]Status: DisposedITAT Indore24 Jan 2019

Bench: Hon'Ble Kul Bharat & Hon'Ble Manish Borad

Section 132Section 142(1)Section 144Section 271(1)(b)

47 appeals are at the instance of assessees being aggrieved with the finding of Ld. CIT(A), confirming the levy of penalty of Rs.10,000/- u/s 271(1)(b) of the Act for non-complying to notice issued u/s 142(1) of the Act. We find that subsequent to the search u/s 132 of the Act at the premises

SUNIT MADHOK,INDORE vs. DCIT,CENTRAL-1, , BHOPAL

In the result, appeals of the assessee(s) in ITANo

ITA 343/IND/2018[15-16]Status: DisposedITAT Indore24 Jan 2019

Bench: Hon'Ble Kul Bharat & Hon'Ble Manish Borad

Section 132Section 142(1)Section 144Section 271(1)(b)

47 appeals are at the instance of assessees being aggrieved with the finding of Ld. CIT(A), confirming the levy of penalty of Rs.10,000/- u/s 271(1)(b) of the Act for non-complying to notice issued u/s 142(1) of the Act. We find that subsequent to the search u/s 132 of the Act at the premises

PATEL EDUCATION AND WELFARE SOCIETY,INDORE vs. DCIT (CENTRAL)- !, BHOPAL

In the result, appeals of the assessee(s) in ITANo

ITA 353/IND/2018[11-12]Status: DisposedITAT Indore24 Jan 2019

Bench: Hon'Ble Kul Bharat & Hon'Ble Manish Borad

Section 132Section 142(1)Section 144Section 271(1)(b)

47 appeals are at the instance of assessees being aggrieved with the finding of Ld. CIT(A), confirming the levy of penalty of Rs.10,000/- u/s 271(1)(b) of the Act for non-complying to notice issued u/s 142(1) of the Act. We find that subsequent to the search u/s 132 of the Act at the premises

M/S REGENT BEERS AND WINES LTD. ,INDORE vs. DCIT,CENTRAL-1, BHOPAL, BHOPAL

In the result, appeals of the assessee(s) in ITANo

ITA 346/IND/2018[11-12]Status: DisposedITAT Indore24 Jan 2019

Bench: Hon'Ble Kul Bharat & Hon'Ble Manish Borad

Section 132Section 142(1)Section 144Section 271(1)(b)

47 appeals are at the instance of assessees being aggrieved with the finding of Ld. CIT(A), confirming the levy of penalty of Rs.10,000/- u/s 271(1)(b) of the Act for non-complying to notice issued u/s 142(1) of the Act. We find that subsequent to the search u/s 132 of the Act at the premises

SUNIT MADHOK,INDORE vs. DCIT,CENTRAL-1, , BHOPAL

In the result, appeals of the assessee(s) in ITANo

ITA 339/IND/2018[11-12]Status: DisposedITAT Indore24 Jan 2019

Bench: Hon'Ble Kul Bharat & Hon'Ble Manish Borad

Section 132Section 142(1)Section 144Section 271(1)(b)

47 appeals are at the instance of assessees being aggrieved with the finding of Ld. CIT(A), confirming the levy of penalty of Rs.10,000/- u/s 271(1)(b) of the Act for non-complying to notice issued u/s 142(1) of the Act. We find that subsequent to the search u/s 132 of the Act at the premises