BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 194Jclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi55Mumbai43Kolkata23Bangalore12Cochin11Chennai10Ahmedabad10Pune9Hyderabad5Jabalpur5Visakhapatnam4Raipur4Patna3Indore3Nagpur1Cuttack1Amritsar1

Key Topics

Section 4010Section 2634Addition to Income3Section 143(3)2Section 234A2Section 143(2)2Section 1942Deduction2Disallowance2

SHYAM SUNDER VERMA ,BHOPAL vs. PR. CIT -2, BHOPAL

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 993/IND/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Indore22 Nov 2022AY 2015-16
For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri P.K. Mitra, CIT-D.R
Section 194CSection 263Section 26A

194J as per section 26AS are more than the receipts shown in ITR I.T.A No. 993/Ind/2019 A.Y. 2015-16 Page No 3 Shri Shyam Sunder Verma vs. Pr. CIT (c) Tax credit claimed in ITR is less than tax credits available in 26AS (d) Mismatch in sales turnover reported in audited report and ITR 4. During the course of assessment

M/S. SOM DISTILLERIES & BREWERIES LTD.,BHOPAL vs. THE ACIT, 1(2), BHOPAL

In the result Ground No.2 of the revenue is allowed for

Natural Justice2
ITA 495/IND/2018[12-13]Status: DisposedITAT Indore24 Oct 2019

Bench: Hon'Ble Kul Bharat & Hon'Ble Manish Boradassessment Year 2012-13 Pan : Aabcs3374B

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 194Section 234ASection 40

penalty for tax withholding lapse per se is separately providedfor in Section 271 C, and, section 40(a)(ia) does not add to the same. The provisions of Section 40(a) (ia), as they existed prior to insertion of second proviso thereto, went much beyond the obvious intentions of the lawmakers and created undue hardships even in cases in which

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 1(1) , BHOPAL vs. M/S. SOM DISTILLERIES & BREWERIES LTD., BHOPAL

In the result Ground No.2 of the revenue is allowed for

ITA 516/IND/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Indore24 Oct 2019AY 2012-13

Bench: Hon'Ble Kul Bharat & Hon'Ble Manish Boradassessment Year 2012-13 Pan : Aabcs3374B

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 194Section 234ASection 40

penalty for tax withholding lapse per se is separately providedfor in Section 271 C, and, section 40(a)(ia) does not add to the same. The provisions of Section 40(a) (ia), as they existed prior to insertion of second proviso thereto, went much beyond the obvious intentions of the lawmakers and created undue hardships even in cases in which