BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

10 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 194clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi285Mumbai157Karnataka100Jaipur88Bangalore45Raipur41Ahmedabad40Calcutta34Kolkata29Chennai21Allahabad17Chandigarh13Hyderabad12Amritsar11Indore10Cochin10Agra9Lucknow9Pune8Dehradun8Surat7Panaji5Nagpur5Visakhapatnam4Rajkot1Rajasthan1Telangana1Patna1

Key Topics

Section 4010Section 115J9Section 271A9Section 143(3)8Section 1546Section 115B6Disallowance6Section 69B5Deduction5

SHRI AMIT TIWARI,INDORE vs. THE DCIT (CENTRAL)-2, INDORE

ITA 699/IND/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Indore18 Aug 2020AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Manish Boradassessment Year:2015-16

Section 132Section 132(4)Section 271A

u/s 292BB of the Act. Therefore, we hereby quash the penalty order.” [Emphasis Supplied] 1.4.4] The Hon’ble ITAT Chennai Bench in the case of DCIT Vs. Shri R. Elangovan [ITA No. 1199/CHNY/2017] has categorically held that: “5…………..It is clear from the Sub Section (3) of Section 271 AAB that Sections 274 and Section 275 of the Act shall

THE ACIT , RATLAM vs. SHRI KAPIL JAIN, RATLAM

In the result appeal of the revenue No

ITA 696/IND/2018[14-15]Status: DisposedITAT Indore27 Jun 2019
Addition to Income5
Section 271(1)(c)3
Set Off of Losses3

Bench: Hon'Ble Kul Bharat & Hon'Ble Manish Borad

Section 10ASection 115JSection 143(3)Section 154Section 271(1)(c)Section 80HSection 80P

194/-. As per the provision of section 115JC to 11SJF are as under:- i) AMT are applicable for Individual, HUF, AOP, BOI~ etc. from assessment year 2013-14 onwards if adjusted total income exceeds Rs, 20,00,000/-. ii) Adjusted total income is net income or total income of the non-corporate assessee increased by: Amount claimed as deduction

THE ACIT , RATLAM vs. SHRI KAPIL JAIN, RATLAM

In the result appeal of the revenue No

ITA 694/IND/2018[14-15]Status: DisposedITAT Indore27 Jun 2019

Bench: Hon'Ble Kul Bharat & Hon'Ble Manish Borad

Section 10ASection 115JSection 143(3)Section 154Section 271(1)(c)Section 80HSection 80P

194/-. As per the provision of section 115JC to 11SJF are as under:- i) AMT are applicable for Individual, HUF, AOP, BOI~ etc. from assessment year 2013-14 onwards if adjusted total income exceeds Rs, 20,00,000/-. ii) Adjusted total income is net income or total income of the non-corporate assessee increased by: Amount claimed as deduction

THE ACIT , RATLAM vs. SHRI KAPIL JAIN, RATLAM

In the result appeal of the revenue No

ITA 695/IND/2018[15-16]Status: DisposedITAT Indore27 Jun 2019

Bench: Hon'Ble Kul Bharat & Hon'Ble Manish Borad

Section 10ASection 115JSection 143(3)Section 154Section 271(1)(c)Section 80HSection 80P

194/-. As per the provision of section 115JC to 11SJF are as under:- i) AMT are applicable for Individual, HUF, AOP, BOI~ etc. from assessment year 2013-14 onwards if adjusted total income exceeds Rs, 20,00,000/-. ii) Adjusted total income is net income or total income of the non-corporate assessee increased by: Amount claimed as deduction

AMIT ASHOK AGRAWAL,INDORE vs. ITO-2(2), INDORE

In the result, the quantum appeal of assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes and penalty appeal of assesse is allowed

ITA 210/IND/2023[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Indore31 Oct 2023AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

Section 144Section 271A

194,465.80 ₹ Trading of Shares payment 100,000.00 ₹ Cash-in-Hand withdrawn (Citibank) 1,033,000.00 ₹ Credit Card Bills Paid 266,820.40 ₹ LIC Paid (For Self & Family Members) 739,161.00 ₹ College Fees of Sister 75,000.00 ₹ Mutual Funds Subscribed 345,000.00 ₹ Misc Expenses 163,098.67 ₹ TOTAL 4,958,545.87 It would be clear from perusal of the above tables that

AMIT ASHOK AGRAWAL,INDORE vs. ITO-2(2), INDORE

In the result, the quantum appeal of assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes and penalty appeal of assesse is allowed

ITA 209/IND/2023[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Indore31 Oct 2023AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

Section 144Section 271A

194,465.80 ₹ Trading of Shares payment 100,000.00 ₹ Cash-in-Hand withdrawn (Citibank) 1,033,000.00 ₹ Credit Card Bills Paid 266,820.40 ₹ LIC Paid (For Self & Family Members) 739,161.00 ₹ College Fees of Sister 75,000.00 ₹ Mutual Funds Subscribed 345,000.00 ₹ Misc Expenses 163,098.67 ₹ TOTAL 4,958,545.87 It would be clear from perusal of the above tables that

M/S. SOM DISTILLERIES & BREWERIES LTD.,BHOPAL vs. THE ACIT, 1(2), BHOPAL

In the result Ground No.2 of the revenue is allowed for

ITA 495/IND/2018[12-13]Status: DisposedITAT Indore24 Oct 2019

Bench: Hon'Ble Kul Bharat & Hon'Ble Manish Boradassessment Year 2012-13 Pan : Aabcs3374B

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 194Section 234ASection 40

194 J of the Act on Royalty paid at Rs.7,96,79,206/- to United Breweries Ltd. Ld. CIT(A) deleted this addition after following various judgments setting aside the issue to the file of Ld. A.O for examining the fact that whether the payee i.e. United Breweries Ltd has offered the royalty income of Rs.7

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 1(1) , BHOPAL vs. M/S. SOM DISTILLERIES & BREWERIES LTD., BHOPAL

In the result Ground No.2 of the revenue is allowed for

ITA 516/IND/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Indore24 Oct 2019AY 2012-13

Bench: Hon'Ble Kul Bharat & Hon'Ble Manish Boradassessment Year 2012-13 Pan : Aabcs3374B

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 194Section 234ASection 40

194 J of the Act on Royalty paid at Rs.7,96,79,206/- to United Breweries Ltd. Ld. CIT(A) deleted this addition after following various judgments setting aside the issue to the file of Ld. A.O for examining the fact that whether the payee i.e. United Breweries Ltd has offered the royalty income of Rs.7

M/S SUPREMO INDIA LTD ,INDORE vs. THE AIT CENTRAL 3, INDORE

In the result, appeal of assessee is allowed

ITA 29/IND/2023[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Indore07 Jun 2023AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyanim/S. Supremo India Pvt. Ltd. Acit Central-3 400/2, Halka Patwari No.52 Indore Vs. Badiakeema Dudhiya, B.O. Indore (Appellant / Assessee) (Respondent/ Revenue) Pan: Aafcs 9822 C Assessee By Shri S.S. Solanki, Ar Revenue By Shri Ashish Porwal, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 01.05.2023 Date Of Pronouncement 07.06.2023

Section 115BSection 131(1)Section 133ASection 69ASection 69B

Penalty proceeding u/s 271AAC is also initiated separately. 6. The AO has applied the provision of section 69B of the Act for want of any supporting evidence regarding source of excess stock and nature of income which was not found recorded in the books of account at the time of survey. On appeal the Ld. CIT(A) has confirmed

ACIT-1(1), INDORE vs. KRITI NUTRIENTS LIMITED, INDORE

The appeal of the Revenue is allowed for statistical\npurposes

ITA 780/IND/2024[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Indore09 Jan 2026AY 2021-22
Section 246ASection 250Section 253

194 (MP)\nIn this case, adhoc disallowances @ 10% was made by the\nAO out of operating expenses, cost of material consumed,\nemployees benefit and other expenses debited to profit and\nloss account at Rs.3,79,85,854/- was deleted by Hon’ble\nTribunal and confirmed by their Lordships of High Court vide\npara 19 and 20 of the order. [Copies