BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

57 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 153Cclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi480Mumbai343Jaipur148Chennai111Bangalore96Pune71Hyderabad57Indore57Surat54Ahmedabad50Kolkata47Allahabad37Chandigarh28Cochin26Visakhapatnam22Rajkot22Nagpur15Guwahati12Dehradun12Panaji10Lucknow9Agra8Amritsar8Patna7Raipur5Cuttack4Jabalpur3Karnataka2Ranchi1

Key Topics

Section 271D182Section 153A110Section 142(1)78Section 269S78Penalty53Section 143(3)50Section 271(1)(b)46Section 143(2)33Section 271

SMT. SARITA CHAWLA,BHOPAL vs. THE ACIT 1(2), BHOPAL

In the result appeal of the assessee for Assessment Years

ITA 442/IND/2015[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Indore26 Nov 2020AY 2006-07

Bench: Hon'Ble Kul Bharat & Hon'Ble Manish Boradit(Ss)A Nos. 158 To 163/Ind/2015 Assessment Years 2000-01 To 2005-06 & Assessment Year-2006-07

Section 234ASection 234BSection 234CSection 271(1)(c)

Section assessee Year order of order of under CIT(A)_1 ACIT-1(2) which passed Late Smt. 2000-01 to 30.03.2015 19.03.2013 153C Sudesh 2005-06 r.w.s. Chawla and 143(3) 2006-07 143(3) Prem Chawla 2000-01 to 30.03.2015 19.03.2013 153C 2005-06 r.w.s. and 143(3) 2006-07 143(3) Smt. Sarita

LATE SMT. SUDESH CHAWLA L/H SHRI PREM CHAWLA,BHOPAL vs. THE ACIT 1(2), BHOPAL

In the result appeal of the assessee for Assessment Years

Showing 1–20 of 57 · Page 1 of 3

30
Search & Seizure16
Addition to Income12
Disallowance4
ITA 441/IND/2015[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Indore26 Nov 2020AY 2006-07

Bench: Hon'Ble Kul Bharat & Hon'Ble Manish Boradit(Ss)A Nos. 158 To 163/Ind/2015 Assessment Years 2000-01 To 2005-06 & Assessment Year-2006-07

Section 234ASection 234BSection 234CSection 271(1)(c)

Section assessee Year order of order of under CIT(A)_1 ACIT-1(2) which passed Late Smt. 2000-01 to 30.03.2015 19.03.2013 153C Sudesh 2005-06 r.w.s. Chawla and 143(3) 2006-07 143(3) Prem Chawla 2000-01 to 30.03.2015 19.03.2013 153C 2005-06 r.w.s. and 143(3) 2006-07 143(3) Smt. Sarita

THE DCIT, 1(1), BHOPAL vs. SMT. SUDESH CHAWLA, BHOPAL

In the result appeal of the assessee for Assessment Years

ITA 405/IND/2015[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Indore26 Nov 2020AY 2006-07

Bench: Hon'Ble Kul Bharat & Hon'Ble Manish Boradit(Ss)A Nos. 158 To 163/Ind/2015 Assessment Years 2000-01 To 2005-06 & Assessment Year-2006-07

Section 234ASection 234BSection 234CSection 271(1)(c)

Section assessee Year order of order of under CIT(A)_1 ACIT-1(2) which passed Late Smt. 2000-01 to 30.03.2015 19.03.2013 153C Sudesh 2005-06 r.w.s. Chawla and 143(3) 2006-07 143(3) Prem Chawla 2000-01 to 30.03.2015 19.03.2013 153C 2005-06 r.w.s. and 143(3) 2006-07 143(3) Smt. Sarita

LATE SHRI RAMBHAU ASAI,BHOPAL vs. THE ITO-2(1), BHOPAL

In the result, all the 28 appeals of the assessee

ITA 818/IND/2016[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Indore16 May 2018AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat, Hon’Ble & Shri Manish Borad, Hon’Bleita Nos. 798 To 804/Ind/2016 A.Ys. 2004-05 To & 2010-11

Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 271(1)(b)Section 271oSection 274

153C r.w.s. 143(3) of the Act and penalty of Rs.10,000/- u/s 271(1)(b) of the Act was levied for non-compliance with notices u/s 142(1) of the Act. 11. We find that on similar issue of levying penalty u/s 271(1)(b) of the Act in the case of the assessee wherein the regular assessments were

SHRI DEEPAK RAMBHAU ASAI (HUF),BHOPAL vs. THE ITO-2(1), BHOPAL

In the result, all the 28 appeals of the assessee

ITA 806/IND/2016[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Indore16 May 2018AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat, Hon’Ble & Shri Manish Borad, Hon’Bleita Nos. 798 To 804/Ind/2016 A.Ys. 2004-05 To & 2010-11

Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 271(1)(b)Section 271oSection 274

153C r.w.s. 143(3) of the Act and penalty of Rs.10,000/- u/s 271(1)(b) of the Act was levied for non-compliance with notices u/s 142(1) of the Act. 11. We find that on similar issue of levying penalty u/s 271(1)(b) of the Act in the case of the assessee wherein the regular assessments were

LATE SHRI RAMBHAU ASAI,BHOPAL vs. THE ITO-2(1), BHOPAL

In the result, all the 28 appeals of the assessee

ITA 817/IND/2016[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Indore16 May 2018AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat, Hon’Ble & Shri Manish Borad, Hon’Bleita Nos. 798 To 804/Ind/2016 A.Ys. 2004-05 To & 2010-11

Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 271(1)(b)Section 271oSection 274

153C r.w.s. 143(3) of the Act and penalty of Rs.10,000/- u/s 271(1)(b) of the Act was levied for non-compliance with notices u/s 142(1) of the Act. 11. We find that on similar issue of levying penalty u/s 271(1)(b) of the Act in the case of the assessee wherein the regular assessments were

LATE SHRI RAMBHAU ASAI,BHOPAL vs. THE ITO-2(1), BHOPAL

In the result, all the 28 appeals of the assessee

ITA 816/IND/2016[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Indore16 May 2018AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat, Hon’Ble & Shri Manish Borad, Hon’Bleita Nos. 798 To 804/Ind/2016 A.Ys. 2004-05 To & 2010-11

Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 271(1)(b)Section 271oSection 274

153C r.w.s. 143(3) of the Act and penalty of Rs.10,000/- u/s 271(1)(b) of the Act was levied for non-compliance with notices u/s 142(1) of the Act. 11. We find that on similar issue of levying penalty u/s 271(1)(b) of the Act in the case of the assessee wherein the regular assessments were

SHRI DEEPAK RAMBHAU ASAI (HUF),BHOPAL vs. THE ITO-2(1), BHOPAL

In the result, all the 28 appeals of the assessee

ITA 811/IND/2016[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Indore16 May 2018AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat, Hon’Ble & Shri Manish Borad, Hon’Bleita Nos. 798 To 804/Ind/2016 A.Ys. 2004-05 To & 2010-11

Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 271(1)(b)Section 271oSection 274

153C r.w.s. 143(3) of the Act and penalty of Rs.10,000/- u/s 271(1)(b) of the Act was levied for non-compliance with notices u/s 142(1) of the Act. 11. We find that on similar issue of levying penalty u/s 271(1)(b) of the Act in the case of the assessee wherein the regular assessments were

LATE SHRI RAMBHAU ASAI,BHOPAL vs. THE ITO-2(1), BHOPAL

In the result, all the 28 appeals of the assessee

ITA 814/IND/2016[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Indore16 May 2018AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat, Hon’Ble & Shri Manish Borad, Hon’Bleita Nos. 798 To 804/Ind/2016 A.Ys. 2004-05 To & 2010-11

Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 271(1)(b)Section 271oSection 274

153C r.w.s. 143(3) of the Act and penalty of Rs.10,000/- u/s 271(1)(b) of the Act was levied for non-compliance with notices u/s 142(1) of the Act. 11. We find that on similar issue of levying penalty u/s 271(1)(b) of the Act in the case of the assessee wherein the regular assessments were

LATE SHRI RAMBHAU ASAI,BHOPAL vs. THE ITO-2(1), BHOPAL

In the result, all the 28 appeals of the assessee

ITA 815/IND/2016[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Indore16 May 2018AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat, Hon’Ble & Shri Manish Borad, Hon’Bleita Nos. 798 To 804/Ind/2016 A.Ys. 2004-05 To & 2010-11

Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 271(1)(b)Section 271oSection 274

153C r.w.s. 143(3) of the Act and penalty of Rs.10,000/- u/s 271(1)(b) of the Act was levied for non-compliance with notices u/s 142(1) of the Act. 11. We find that on similar issue of levying penalty u/s 271(1)(b) of the Act in the case of the assessee wherein the regular assessments were

SHRI RAMBHAU GHANSHYAM ASAI (HUF),BHOPAL vs. THE ITO-2(1), BHOPAL

In the result, all the 28 appeals of the assessee

ITA 798/IND/2016[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Indore16 May 2018AY 2004-05

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat, Hon’Ble & Shri Manish Borad, Hon’Bleita Nos. 798 To 804/Ind/2016 A.Ys. 2004-05 To & 2010-11

Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 271(1)(b)Section 271oSection 274

153C r.w.s. 143(3) of the Act and penalty of Rs.10,000/- u/s 271(1)(b) of the Act was levied for non-compliance with notices u/s 142(1) of the Act. 11. We find that on similar issue of levying penalty u/s 271(1)(b) of the Act in the case of the assessee wherein the regular assessments were

SHRI DEEPAK RAMBHAU ASAI (HUF),BHOPAL vs. THE ITO-2(1), BHOPAL

In the result, all the 28 appeals of the assessee

ITA 805/IND/2016[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Indore16 May 2018AY 2004-05

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat, Hon’Ble & Shri Manish Borad, Hon’Bleita Nos. 798 To 804/Ind/2016 A.Ys. 2004-05 To & 2010-11

Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 271(1)(b)Section 271oSection 274

153C r.w.s. 143(3) of the Act and penalty of Rs.10,000/- u/s 271(1)(b) of the Act was levied for non-compliance with notices u/s 142(1) of the Act. 11. We find that on similar issue of levying penalty u/s 271(1)(b) of the Act in the case of the assessee wherein the regular assessments were

SHRI DEEPAK RAMBHAU ASAI (HUF),BHOPAL vs. THE ITO-2(1), BHOPAL

In the result, all the 28 appeals of the assessee

ITA 810/IND/2016[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Indore16 May 2018AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat, Hon’Ble & Shri Manish Borad, Hon’Bleita Nos. 798 To 804/Ind/2016 A.Ys. 2004-05 To & 2010-11

Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 271(1)(b)Section 271oSection 274

153C r.w.s. 143(3) of the Act and penalty of Rs.10,000/- u/s 271(1)(b) of the Act was levied for non-compliance with notices u/s 142(1) of the Act. 11. We find that on similar issue of levying penalty u/s 271(1)(b) of the Act in the case of the assessee wherein the regular assessments were

SHRI DEEPAK RAMBHAU ASAI (HUF),BHOPAL vs. THE ITO-2(1), BHOPAL

In the result, all the 28 appeals of the assessee

ITA 808/IND/2016[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Indore16 May 2018AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat, Hon’Ble & Shri Manish Borad, Hon’Bleita Nos. 798 To 804/Ind/2016 A.Ys. 2004-05 To & 2010-11

Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 271(1)(b)Section 271oSection 274

153C r.w.s. 143(3) of the Act and penalty of Rs.10,000/- u/s 271(1)(b) of the Act was levied for non-compliance with notices u/s 142(1) of the Act. 11. We find that on similar issue of levying penalty u/s 271(1)(b) of the Act in the case of the assessee wherein the regular assessments were

LATE SHRI RAMBHAU ASAI,BHOPAL vs. THE ITO-2(1), BHOPAL

In the result, all the 28 appeals of the assessee

ITA 812/IND/2016[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Indore16 May 2018AY 2004-05

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat, Hon’Ble & Shri Manish Borad, Hon’Bleita Nos. 798 To 804/Ind/2016 A.Ys. 2004-05 To & 2010-11

Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 271(1)(b)Section 271oSection 274

153C r.w.s. 143(3) of the Act and penalty of Rs.10,000/- u/s 271(1)(b) of the Act was levied for non-compliance with notices u/s 142(1) of the Act. 11. We find that on similar issue of levying penalty u/s 271(1)(b) of the Act in the case of the assessee wherein the regular assessments were

SHRI RAMBHAU GHANSHYAM ASAI (HUF),BHOPAL vs. THE ITO-2(1), BHOPAL

In the result, all the 28 appeals of the assessee

ITA 799/IND/2016[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Indore16 May 2018AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat, Hon’Ble & Shri Manish Borad, Hon’Bleita Nos. 798 To 804/Ind/2016 A.Ys. 2004-05 To & 2010-11

Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 271(1)(b)Section 271oSection 274

153C r.w.s. 143(3) of the Act and penalty of Rs.10,000/- u/s 271(1)(b) of the Act was levied for non-compliance with notices u/s 142(1) of the Act. 11. We find that on similar issue of levying penalty u/s 271(1)(b) of the Act in the case of the assessee wherein the regular assessments were

SHRI DEEPAK RAMBHAU ASAI (HUF),BHOPAL vs. THE ITO-2(1), BHOPAL

In the result, all the 28 appeals of the assessee

ITA 807/IND/2016[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Indore16 May 2018AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat, Hon’Ble & Shri Manish Borad, Hon’Bleita Nos. 798 To 804/Ind/2016 A.Ys. 2004-05 To & 2010-11

Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 271(1)(b)Section 271oSection 274

153C r.w.s. 143(3) of the Act and penalty of Rs.10,000/- u/s 271(1)(b) of the Act was levied for non-compliance with notices u/s 142(1) of the Act. 11. We find that on similar issue of levying penalty u/s 271(1)(b) of the Act in the case of the assessee wherein the regular assessments were

SHRI DEEPAK RAMBHAU ASAI (HUF),BHOPAL vs. THE ITO-2(1), BHOPAL

In the result, all the 28 appeals of the assessee

ITA 809/IND/2016[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Indore16 May 2018AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat, Hon’Ble & Shri Manish Borad, Hon’Bleita Nos. 798 To 804/Ind/2016 A.Ys. 2004-05 To & 2010-11

Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 271(1)(b)Section 271oSection 274

153C r.w.s. 143(3) of the Act and penalty of Rs.10,000/- u/s 271(1)(b) of the Act was levied for non-compliance with notices u/s 142(1) of the Act. 11. We find that on similar issue of levying penalty u/s 271(1)(b) of the Act in the case of the assessee wherein the regular assessments were

LATE SHRI RAMBHAU ASAI,BHOPAL vs. THE ITO-2(1), BHOPAL

In the result, all the 28 appeals of the assessee

ITA 813/IND/2016[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Indore16 May 2018AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat, Hon’Ble & Shri Manish Borad, Hon’Bleita Nos. 798 To 804/Ind/2016 A.Ys. 2004-05 To & 2010-11

Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 271(1)(b)Section 271oSection 274

153C r.w.s. 143(3) of the Act and penalty of Rs.10,000/- u/s 271(1)(b) of the Act was levied for non-compliance with notices u/s 142(1) of the Act. 11. We find that on similar issue of levying penalty u/s 271(1)(b) of the Act in the case of the assessee wherein the regular assessments were

THE ACIT 5(1), INDORE vs. KU. NISHITA SINGHAL, MHOW DISTT. INDORE

In the result, Revenue’s appeal in ITANo

ITA 935/IND/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Indore04 Oct 2021AY 2015-16

Bench: Hon’Ble Rajpal Yadav & Shri Manish Boradvirtual Hearing Assessment Year: 2015-16 Acit-5(1) Indore : Appellant

Section 132Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 153CSection 271ASection 274Section 27A

153C of the Act, penalty proceedings cannot be initiated u/s 271AAB of the Act. Even otherwise in the penalty notice Ld. Assessing Officer though has levied the penalty u/s 271AAB of the Act but has not calculated the penalty under the provision of section 271AAB of the Act. In para 8 of the penalty order Ld. Assessing Officer states that