ANUJ TIWARI,DHAR vs. ACIT(CENTRAL)-2, INDORE

Appeals are dismissed

271(1)(b)/272A(1)(d). The AO\nhas imposed a penalty of Rs. 10,000/- in each of the assessment-year for\nassessee's failure to comply with the notice issued by AO u/s 142(1).\n8. Having heard learned Representatives of both sides, we find that the\nassessee has remained non-compliant to the notices issued

ANUJ TIWARI,DHAR vs. ACIT(CENTRAL)-2, INDORE

Appeals are dismissed

271(1)(b)/272A(1)(d). The AO\nhas imposed a penalty of Rs. 10,000/- in each of the assessment-year for\nassessee's failure to comply with the notice issued by AO u/s 142(1).\n8.\nHaving heard learned Representatives of both sides, we find that the\nassessee has remained non-compliant to the notices issued

MR GAURAV AJMERA,RATLAM vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE -2, INDORE

Accordingly. Thus, this ground is allowed partly for statistical purpose

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyaniassessment Year: 2017-18 Mr. Gaurav Ajmera, Dcit, बनाम/ 38, Ram Mohalla, Central Circle 2, Ratlam Indore. Vs. (Assessee / Appellant) (Revenue / Respondent) Pan: Aglpa8863C Assessee By Shri Pawan Ved, Advocate & Ar Revenue By Shri Ashish Porwal, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 13.06.2023 Date Of Pronouncement 01.09.2023

132A was issued. The statements of assessee were again recorded u/s 132(4) on the very same date i.e. 14.11.2016 wherein the assessee accepted that the impugned cash was not recorded in his books and it was earned from undisclosed sources. All statements are re-produced by AO in assessment-order. The cash was seized. Thereafter, the assessments of past

ANUJ TIWARI,DHAR vs. ACIT(CENTRAL)-2, INDORE

Appeals are dismissed

271(1)(b)/272A(1)(d). The AO\nhas imposed a penalty of Rs. 10,000/- in each of the assessment-year for\nassessee's failure to comply with the notice issued by AO u/s 142(1).\n8.\nHaving heard learned Representatives of both sides, we find that the\nassessee has remained non-compliant to the notices issued

ANUJ TIWARI,DHAR vs. ACIT(CENTRAL)-2, INDORE

Appeals are dismissed

271(1)(b)/272A(1)(d). The AO\nhas imposed a penalty of Rs. 10,000/- in each of the assessment-year for\nassessee's failure to comply with the notice issued by AO u/s 142(1).\nHaving heard learned Representatives of both sides, we find that the\nassessee has remained non-compliant to the notices issued by AO without

ANUJ TIWARI,DHAR vs. ACIT(CENTRAL)-2, INDORE

Appeals are dismissed

271(1)(b)/272A(1)(d). The AO\nhas imposed a penalty of Rs. 10,000/- in each of the assessment-year for\nassessee's failure to comply with the notice issued by AO u/s 142(1).\n8. Having heard learned Representatives of both sides, we find that the\nassessee has remained non-compliant to the notices issued

ANUJ TIWARI,DHAR vs. ACIT(CENTRAL)-2, INDORE

Appeals are dismissed

271(1)(b)/272A(1)(d). The AO\nhas imposed a penalty of Rs. 10,000/- in each of the assessment-year for\nassessee's failure to comply with the notice issued by AO u/s 142(1).\n8. Having heard learned Representatives of both sides, we find that the\nassessee has remained non-compliant to the notices issued

ANUJ TIWARI,DHAR vs. ACIT(CENTRAL)-2, INDORE

Appeals are dismissed

271(1)(b)/272A(1)(d). The AO\nhas imposed a penalty of Rs. 10,000/- in each of the assessment-year for\nassessee's failure to comply with the notice issued by AO u/s 142(1).\n8. Having heard learned Representatives of both sides, we find that the\nassessee has remained non-compliant to the notices issued

ANUJ TIWARI,DHAR vs. ACIT(CENTRAL)-2, INDORE

271(1)(b)/272A(1)(d) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 [“Act\r\n\r\n2.\r\nSince these appeals relate to same assessee/appellant and same\r\nassessment-years, they were heard together at the request of parties and\r\nare being disposed of by this common order. We first take up Quantum-\r\nAppeals and thereafter Penalty-Appeals