BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Penny Stockclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai90Ahmedabad25Jaipur17Kolkata16Delhi13Hyderabad12Surat5Pune4Indore4Raipur4Lucknow3Cuttack2Ranchi2Rajkot2Jodhpur1Bangalore1Chennai1Guwahati1Agra1Nagpur1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)5Section 253(5)4Addition to Income4Section 1393Section 1483Penny Stock2Limitation/Time-bar2Condonation of Delay2

SEEMA LUNAWAT,RATLAM vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, MANDSAUR

Appeal is allowed

ITA 300/IND/2024[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Indore28 Feb 2025AY 2011-12
Section 139Section 147Section 148

penny stock company\ni.e. “M/s Twenty first century India Ltd." during the F.Y. 2010-11.\nIn view of the facts and circumstances of the case, the explanation given by\nthe assessee does not found to be satisfactory. Therefore, the amount of Rs.\n1,89,650/- is added to the total income of the assessee u/s

INCOME TAX OFFICER 5(1), INDORE vs. UMANG DEVELOPERS, INDORE

Appeals are dismissed

ITA 502/IND/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Indore27 Mar 2025AY 2017-18
Section 139
Section 143(3)
Section 253(5)

penny stock company and\ninvolved in providing entries to its beneficiaries.\n2. On the facts and circumstances of the case, Ld. CIT(A) erred in deleting the\naddition of Rs.1,81,33,897/- u/s 68 as bogus sundry creditors on the basis\nof remand report submitted by the AO. Ld. CIT(A) ignored that the issue\nrequired proper verification

INCOME TAX OFFICER INDORE 5(1), INDORE vs. UMANG DEVELOPERS, INDORE

Appeals are dismissed

ITA 503/IND/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Indore27 Mar 2025AY 2018-19
Section 139Section 143(3)Section 253(5)

penny stock company and\ninvolved in providing entries to its beneficiaries.\n2. On the facts and circumstances of the case, Ld. CIT(A) erred in deleting the\naddition of Rs.1,81,33,897/- u/s 68 as bogus sundry creditors on the basis\nof remand report submitted by the AO. Ld. CIT(A) ignored that the issue\nrequired proper verification

BABITA CHELAWAT,INDORE vs. DCIT/ACIT 1(1), INDORE, INDORE

The appeal of the assessee is allowed & the impugned order is set aside

ITA 611/IND/2025[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Indore27 Mar 2026AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri B.M. Biyani & Shri Paresh M Joshi

Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 246ASection 250Section 253

penny stock transactions and SLP was also dismissed by Hon'ble Supreme Court in the above matter. Hence, the ground of appeal is without any merit and hence the same is dismissed. 8.6 Vide Ground No. 8, the appellant has submitted that Ld. AO erred by not serving the order for rectification request made by the assessee for mistake apparent