BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

8 results for “house property”+ Section 457clear

Sorted by relevance

Karnataka290Delhi179Mumbai133Bangalore73Cochin58Ahmedabad35Jaipur24Kolkata20Chennai14Chandigarh11Lucknow10Hyderabad8Indore8Telangana6Guwahati5Agra3Pune2Raipur2SC1Surat1Dehradun1Rajasthan1Andhra Pradesh1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)10Addition to Income8Section 271A7Section 153A6Section 1476Section 1435Section 2634Section 69A4Section 684House Property

SHRI SURENDRA SINGH BHATIA,INDORE vs. THE JCIT-3, INDORE

In the result, assessee’s appeal is allowed

ITA 252/IND/2017[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Indore24 Nov 2022AY 2008-09

Bench: Ms. Madhumita Roy & Shri Bhagirath Mal Biyani

For Appellant: Shri Sumit Nema, Sr. Advocate with Shri Gagan TiwariFor Respondent: 28.09.2022
Section 132Section 132(4)Section 143Section 143(1)Section 271ASection 271DSection 274Section 41(1)

House, Navratan Bagh Main CGO Complex, Road, Indore Indore (M.P.) PAN No. ABHPB5246R (Appellant) .. (Respondent) Appellant by : Shri Sumit Nema, Sr. Advocate with Shri Gagan Tiwari, Advocate Ms. Simran Bhullar, CIT.D.R. Respondent by : 28.09.2022 Date of Hearing Date of Pronouncement 24 .11.2022 O R D E R PER Ms. MADHUMITA ROY - JM: The instant appeal filed by the assessee

4
Undisclosed Income3
Search & Seizure2

CHANDRA SAHU,BHOPAL vs. ITO-1(4), BHOPAL

In the result appeal of the assessee for Assessment Year 2010-

ITA 75/IND/2019[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Indore30 Apr 2021AY 2010-11

Bench: Hon’Ble Manish Borad & Hon’Ble Madhumita Roy

Section 139(1)Section 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 68Section 69A

House Property and income from running a restaurant. Return of income u/s 139(1) of the Act for Assessment Year 2010-11 was filed on 22.09.2011 at Rs.2,18,555/- and agriculture income of Rs.1,26,500/- and for Assessment Year 2011-12 return of income was filed on 14.02.2012 declaring income of Rs. 2,50,459/- and agriculture income

CHANDRA SAHU,BHOPAL vs. ITO-1(4), BHOPAL

In the result appeal of the assessee for Assessment Year 2010-

ITA 76/IND/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Indore30 Apr 2021AY 2011-12

Bench: Hon’Ble Manish Borad & Hon’Ble Madhumita Roy

Section 139(1)Section 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 68Section 69A

House Property and income from running a restaurant. Return of income u/s 139(1) of the Act for Assessment Year 2010-11 was filed on 22.09.2011 at Rs.2,18,555/- and agriculture income of Rs.1,26,500/- and for Assessment Year 2011-12 return of income was filed on 14.02.2012 declaring income of Rs. 2,50,459/- and agriculture income

M/S RADHISHWARI DEVLOPERS P LTD,INDORE vs. PR CIT -2 INDORE, INDORE

In the result, Assessee’s appeal in ITANo

ITA 493/IND/2018[13-14]Status: DisposedITAT Indore20 Jul 2021

Bench: Hon’Ble Rajpal Yadav & Hon’Ble Manish Boradvirtual Hearing Assessment Year 2013-14 M/S. Radhishwari Developers P. Ltd. (Now Known As R.C. Warehousing Pvt. Ltd. ) Indore : Appellant Pan :Aafcr1916A V/S Pr. Cito-2 : Respondent Indore Appellant By S/Shri Sumit Nema Sr. Adv. With Gagan Tiwari & Piyush Parashar Advs. Revenue By Shri S.S. Mantri, Cit-Dr Date Of Hearing 24.05.2021 Date Of Pronouncement 20.07.2021

Section 133(6)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 263

property. E- M/s. Radheshwari Developers Pvt. Ltd. return of income filed on 27.09.2013 declaring loss of Rs.51,72,569/- which comprises of depreciation loss at Rs.1,53,066/- and business loss of Rs.50,19,503/-. Case selected for scrutiny assessment through CASS for the reason ‘large unsecured loans’. Notices u/s 143(2) & 142(1) of the Act duly served upon

SMT. BHARTI BHASNE,BHOPAL vs. THE ACIT 2(1), BHOPAL

In the result, the appeals in IT(SS)A Nos

ITA 404/IND/2014[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Indore16 May 2023AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar (Judicial Member), Shri B.M. Biyani (Accountant Member)

Section 132(1)Section 153A

house property. There was a search and seizure operation u/s. 132(1) of the Act was conducted in the residential premises on 26.02.2009. 2.1. During the course of search, cash of Rs. 3,93,800/- was found and out of that Rs. 3,53,300/- was seized. There were jewelries of Gold and Silver were found in the residential premises

LATE SHRI JITENDRA KUMAR BHASNE THROUGH LEGAL HEIR SMT. BHARTI BHASNE,BHOPAL vs. THE ACIT 2(1), BHOPAL

In the result, the appeals in IT(SS)A Nos

ITA 406/IND/2014[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Indore16 May 2023AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar (Judicial Member), Shri B.M. Biyani (Accountant Member)

Section 132(1)Section 153A

house property. There was a search and seizure operation u/s. 132(1) of the Act was conducted in the residential premises on 26.02.2009. 2.1. During the course of search, cash of Rs. 3,93,800/- was found and out of that Rs. 3,53,300/- was seized. There were jewelries of Gold and Silver were found in the residential premises

SHRI SANJEEV PATNI,INDORE vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-3(1), INDORE

In the result appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 62/IND/2018[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Indore01 Sept 2021AY 2009-10

Bench: Hon’Ble Rajpal Yadav & Shri Manish Boradvirtual Hearing Assessment Year: 2009-10 Sanjeev Patni Indore Pan:Aftpp6237Q : Appellant

Section 10Section 139Section 143Section 144Section 147Section 69

457 (ITAT, Mumbai) wherein it was held as under: “We have to decide whether there was service of notice u/s.143(2) much less a proper service as per Rule 17 of Order V of CPC, which requires that before service of notice by affixture, notice server/service officer must make diligent search for person to be served and, he, therefore must

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-3 (1), INDORE vs. SHRI SANJEEV PATNI, INDORE

In the result appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 189/IND/2018[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Indore01 Sept 2021AY 2009-10

Bench: Hon’Ble Rajpal Yadav & Shri Manish Boradvirtual Hearing Assessment Year: 2009-10 Sanjeev Patni Indore Pan:Aftpp6237Q : Appellant

Section 10Section 139Section 143Section 144Section 147Section 69

457 (ITAT, Mumbai) wherein it was held as under: “We have to decide whether there was service of notice u/s.143(2) much less a proper service as per Rule 17 of Order V of CPC, which requires that before service of notice by affixture, notice server/service officer must make diligent search for person to be served and, he, therefore must