BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

8 results for “house property”+ Section 452clear

Sorted by relevance

Karnataka298Delhi221Mumbai129Ahmedabad42Jaipur37Bangalore25Hyderabad15Chandigarh13Lucknow12Chennai9Indore8Kolkata6Pune5Surat4Telangana4SC3Visakhapatnam1Andhra Pradesh1Calcutta1Gauhati1Jodhpur1Patna1

Key Topics

Section 144C(13)6Disallowance5Addition to Income5Section 143(3)4Section 144C(8)3Section 80I3Section 683Section 234A3Section 234B3

THE ACIT, 4(1), INDORE vs. SHRI SANJAY LUNAWAT, INDORE

ITA 396/IND/2018[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Indore13 Sept 2021AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice- & Shri Manish Boradvirtual Hearing Assessment Year 2010-11

Section 143(3)Section 201(1)Section 40Section 68

452 (MP); CIT v. Metachem Industries as reported in [2000] 245 ITR 160 (MP) CIT v. Mark Hospitals (P.) Ltd. as reported in [2015] 373 ITR 115 (Madras)(Mag.) 16. In view of the above discussion in the light of the judicial pronouncements (supra), we are of the view that the addition of Rs. 1,59,30,060/- as made

M/S SWADESH DEVLOPERS AND BUILDERS,BHOPAL vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL)-2, BHOPAL

ITA 705/IND/2017[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Indore10 Aug 2021AY 2014-15
Section 234C3
Transfer Pricing3
Double Taxation/DTAA3

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav Hon'Ble & Shri Manish Borad

Section 132Section 143(2)Section 153ASection 44ASection 80I

452/-, Rs.2,66,948/- and Rs.2,44,417/- respectively. The time limit for issuance of notices u/s 143(2) of the Act stood expired in relation to the assessment year 2008-09 to 2010-11 much before the date of conducting the search i.e. 29.1.2014 and therefore these three assessment years falls under the category of unabated/non abated assessments

M/S. COMPUTER SCIENCE CORPORATION INDIA PVT. LTD.,CHENNAI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-CIRCLE 2(1) , INDORE

In the result, all the three appeals are partly allowed for statistical purpose and the Stay Application is also disposed of

ITA 319/IND/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Indore10 Apr 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Kamble & Shri Bhagirath Mal Biyani

For Appellant: Shri Vishal Kalra, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri P.K. Mishra, CIT DR
Section 143(3)Section 144C(13)Section 144C(8)

452 010. [PAN – AABCC 5820 A] (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by : Shri Vishal Kalra, Advocate Revenue by : Shri P.K. Mishra, CIT DR Date of hearing : 08.02.2023 Date of pronouncement : 10.04.2023 O R D E R PER SUCHITRA KAMBLE, JUDICIAL MEMBER : These three appeals, pertaining to the same assessee, are filed by the assessee against three different orders dated 05.02.2016 passed

M/S. COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED,INDORE vs. THE ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-2(1), INDORE

In the result, all the three appeals are partly allowed for statistical purpose and the Stay Application is also disposed of

ITA 179/IND/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Indore10 Apr 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Kamble & Shri Bhagirath Mal Biyani

For Appellant: Shri Vishal Kalra, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri P.K. Mishra, CIT DR
Section 143(3)Section 144C(13)Section 144C(8)

452 010. [PAN – AABCC 5820 A] (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by : Shri Vishal Kalra, Advocate Revenue by : Shri P.K. Mishra, CIT DR Date of hearing : 08.02.2023 Date of pronouncement : 10.04.2023 O R D E R PER SUCHITRA KAMBLE, JUDICIAL MEMBER : These three appeals, pertaining to the same assessee, are filed by the assessee against three different orders dated 05.02.2016 passed

M/S. COMPUTER SCIENCE CORPORATION INDIA PVT. LTD.,CHENNAI vs. THE ACIT-CIRCLE 2(1), INDORE

In the result, all the three appeals are partly allowed for statistical purpose and the Stay Application is also disposed of

ITA 292/IND/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Indore10 Apr 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Kamble & Shri Bhagirath Mal Biyani

For Appellant: Shri Vishal Kalra, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri P.K. Mishra, CIT DR
Section 143(3)Section 144C(13)Section 144C(8)

452 010. [PAN – AABCC 5820 A] (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by : Shri Vishal Kalra, Advocate Revenue by : Shri P.K. Mishra, CIT DR Date of hearing : 08.02.2023 Date of pronouncement : 10.04.2023 O R D E R PER SUCHITRA KAMBLE, JUDICIAL MEMBER : These three appeals, pertaining to the same assessee, are filed by the assessee against three different orders dated 05.02.2016 passed

SMT. SARITA CHAWLA,BHOPAL vs. THE ACIT 1(2), BHOPAL

In the result appeal of the assessee for Assessment Years

ITA 442/IND/2015[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Indore26 Nov 2020AY 2006-07

Bench: Hon'Ble Kul Bharat & Hon'Ble Manish Boradit(Ss)A Nos. 158 To 163/Ind/2015 Assessment Years 2000-01 To 2005-06 & Assessment Year-2006-07

Section 234ASection 234BSection 234CSection 271(1)(c)

452-497 2006-07 PB 551-608 8. The disallowance was arbitrarily made and had no supporting basis. 9.Non-production of books before the Id AO in the first round: - Ld AO in the first round (PB 4, Third para from top) has pointed out that assessee did not file any substantive details as he claimed that books of account

THE DCIT, 1(1), BHOPAL vs. SMT. SUDESH CHAWLA, BHOPAL

In the result appeal of the assessee for Assessment Years

ITA 405/IND/2015[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Indore26 Nov 2020AY 2006-07

Bench: Hon'Ble Kul Bharat & Hon'Ble Manish Boradit(Ss)A Nos. 158 To 163/Ind/2015 Assessment Years 2000-01 To 2005-06 & Assessment Year-2006-07

Section 234ASection 234BSection 234CSection 271(1)(c)

452-497 2006-07 PB 551-608 8. The disallowance was arbitrarily made and had no supporting basis. 9.Non-production of books before the Id AO in the first round: - Ld AO in the first round (PB 4, Third para from top) has pointed out that assessee did not file any substantive details as he claimed that books of account

LATE SMT. SUDESH CHAWLA L/H SHRI PREM CHAWLA,BHOPAL vs. THE ACIT 1(2), BHOPAL

In the result appeal of the assessee for Assessment Years

ITA 441/IND/2015[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Indore26 Nov 2020AY 2006-07

Bench: Hon'Ble Kul Bharat & Hon'Ble Manish Boradit(Ss)A Nos. 158 To 163/Ind/2015 Assessment Years 2000-01 To 2005-06 & Assessment Year-2006-07

Section 234ASection 234BSection 234CSection 271(1)(c)

452-497 2006-07 PB 551-608 8. The disallowance was arbitrarily made and had no supporting basis. 9.Non-production of books before the Id AO in the first round: - Ld AO in the first round (PB 4, Third para from top) has pointed out that assessee did not file any substantive details as he claimed that books of account