BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “house property”+ Section 293Cclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi5Indore3Jaipur2

Key Topics

Section 143(3)21Section 153A12Section 686Section 1323Section 132(4)3Section 143(2)3Section 142(1)3Addition to Income3

THE DCIT, 2(1), INDORE vs. SHRI KESHAV KUMAR NACHANI, INDORE

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 309/IND/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Indore25 Jan 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Smt. Madhumita Roy & Shri Bhagirath Mal Biyani

For Appellant: Shri S. S. Deshpande, CAFor Respondent: Shri P.K. Mishra, CIT-DR
Section 132Section 132(4)Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 68

293C which provides legal presumption that the document belongs to the persons from whose possession and control it was found. Accordingly, the impugned addition of Rs.53,19,36,960/- was deleted. Dissatisfied with the action of the ld.CIT(A), Revenue is now appeal before the Tribunal. 14. Before us, the ld.DR while opposing the order of the ld.CIT(A), reiterated

THE DCIT, 2(1), INDORE vs. SHRI KESHAV KUMAR NACHANI, INDORE

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 244/IND/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Indore25 Jan 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Smt. Madhumita Roy & Shri Bhagirath Mal Biyani

For Appellant: Shri S. S. Deshpande, CAFor Respondent: Shri P.K. Mishra, CIT-DR
Section 132Section 132(4)Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 68

293C which provides legal presumption that the document belongs to the persons from whose possession and control it was found. Accordingly, the impugned addition of Rs.53,19,36,960/- was deleted. Dissatisfied with the action of the ld.CIT(A), Revenue is now appeal before the Tribunal. 14. Before us, the ld.DR while opposing the order of the ld.CIT(A), reiterated

JCIT(OSD),-2(1),INDORE, INDORE vs. SHRI KESHAV KUMAR NACHANI, INDORE

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 441/IND/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Indore25 Jan 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Smt. Madhumita Roy & Shri Bhagirath Mal Biyani

For Appellant: Shri S. S. Deshpande, CAFor Respondent: Shri P.K. Mishra, CIT-DR
Section 132Section 132(4)Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 68

293C which provides legal presumption that the document belongs to the persons from whose possession and control it was found. Accordingly, the impugned addition of Rs.53,19,36,960/- was deleted. Dissatisfied with the action of the ld.CIT(A), Revenue is now appeal before the Tribunal. 14. Before us, the ld.DR while opposing the order of the ld.CIT(A), reiterated