BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

5 results for “house property”+ Section 260Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi143Mumbai71Jaipur26Chennai24SC12Amritsar11Nagpur7Hyderabad7Raipur6Bangalore6Indore5Cochin5Ahmedabad4Kolkata4Allahabad3Jodhpur2Lucknow2D.K. JAIN JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR1H.L. DATTU S.A. BOBDE1Surat1T.S. THAKUR ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1Varanasi1

Key Topics

Section 40A(3)9Section 699Section 153A6Addition to Income5Section 1324Section 1474Section 1483Unexplained Investment3Disallowance3

DCIT- (CENTRAL)-3, INDORE vs. MRS. JATINDER KAUR BHATIA, KHANDWA

Appeals are dismissed and assessee’s

ITA 206/IND/2023[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Indore22 Aug 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

Section 132Section 153ASection 40A(3)Section 69

Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 was pending before the Rajasthan High Court. However, in view of the finding recorded by the Tribunal that the local Public Works Department rates are to be applied and adopted in place of Central Public Works Department rates, we do not find any good ground to interfere in the impugned judgment

DCIT- (CENTRAL)-3, INDORE vs. MRS. JATINDER KAUR BHATIA, KHANDWA

Appeals are dismissed and assessee’s

Section 271A2
Section 143(3)2
ITA 207/IND/2023[2016-17]Status: Disposed
ITAT Indore
22 Aug 2024
AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

Section 132Section 153ASection 40A(3)Section 69

Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 was pending before the Rajasthan High Court. However, in view of the finding recorded by the Tribunal that the local Public Works Department rates are to be applied and adopted in place of Central Public Works Department rates, we do not find any good ground to interfere in the impugned judgment

MRS. JATINDER KAUR BHATIA,KHANDWA vs. ACIT- (CENTRAL) UJJAIN, UJJAIN

Appeals are dismissed and assessee’s

ITA 227/IND/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Indore22 Aug 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

Section 132Section 153ASection 40A(3)Section 69

Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 was pending before the Rajasthan High Court. However, in view of the finding recorded by the Tribunal that the local Public Works Department rates are to be applied and adopted in place of Central Public Works Department rates, we do not find any good ground to interfere in the impugned judgment

GAURAV AJMERA,RATLAM vs. DCIT(CENTRAL)-2, INDORE

Appeal is allowed

ITA 808/IND/2024[2017-2018]Status: DisposedITAT Indore25 Aug 2025AY 2017-2018
Section 131Section 132(4)Section 132ASection 143(3)Section 234ASection 271ASection 274

260A of the Act, wherein again the assessee raised the legal issue\nand submitted that the same is squarely covered by the decision of the\nHon'ble jurisdictional High Court. The Hon'ble High Court, vide order dated\n08/11/2023, passed in ITA (L) No. 1009, 1014, and 1029 of 2022,\npermitted the assessee to withdraw its appeal and further directed

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 1 (1), BHOPAL vs. SHRI NEERAJ MANDLOI, NEW DELHI

ITA 680/IND/2018[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Indore28 Jul 2021AY 2009-10

Bench: Hon’Ble Manish Borad & Hon’Ble Madhumita Royassessment Year 2009-10

Section 132Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 153Section 153C

260A of the Act before the Hon'ble M.P. High Court against the order of the ITAT quashing the order ss] s.263. The Hon'ble M.P. High Court dismissed the departmental appeal and held that the power exercised by CIT u/s 263 was unsustainable in law. A copy of the decision of Hon'ble High Court reported