BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “disallowance”+ Section 92Eclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai166Delhi106Bangalore42Ahmedabad29Kolkata28Pune20Chennai17Jaipur14Hyderabad14Jodhpur3Indore3Varanasi2Karnataka2Chandigarh2Panaji2Amritsar2Nagpur1Telangana1Himachal Pradesh1Jabalpur1Dehradun1Surat1

Key Topics

Section 271A7Section 80I7Section 92E5Section 92B4Section 139(1)3Section 92C3Section 143(1)2Section 143(3)2Disallowance2Addition to Income

ACIT-2(1), UJJAIN, UJJAIN vs. M/S RUCHI J OIL PVT. LTD,, MUMBAI

In the result, Revenue’s appeal ITANo

ITA 82/IND/2020[2014-15]Status: HeardITAT Indore17 Jan 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Mahavir Prasad & Shri Manish Boradvirtual Hearing Assessment Year: 2014-15

Section 271ASection 40A(2)(b)Section 91D(1)Section 92BSection 92D(1)

92E “Specified Domestic Transaction” in case of an assessee means any of the following transactions, not being an international transaction, namely:- 12. Any expenditure in respect of which payment has been made or is to be made to a person referred to in clause (b) of sub-section (2) of section 40A; (emphasis supplied) 13. Any transaction referred

COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED,CHENNAI vs. ACIT, CHENNAI

2
ITA 1654/CHNY/2011[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Indore06 Oct 2023AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyaniassessment Year: 2007-08 Computer Sciences Acit, Corporation India Private Company Circle 1(3), Limited, Chennai [Formerly Covansys (India) Private Limited], बनाम/ Unit 13, Block 2, Sdf Buildings, Vs. Madras Export Processing Zone, Tambaram, Chennai (Assessee / Appellant) (Revenue / Respondent) Pan: Aaacc1351M Assessee By Shri Neeraj Jain, Adv. Shri Abhishek Agrawal, Ca Revenue By Shri P.K. Mishra, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing 12.07.2023 Date Of Pronouncement

Section 10ASection 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 144C(5)Section 14ASection 92C

disallowing expenditure towards earning of such income, under section 14A, whereas, no expenditure was in fact incurred by the assessee towards earning such income. 25. The ld. AO has erred in computing interest u/s 234B of the Act on the assessed income since the addition to the returned income on account of Transfer Pricing adjustment is only a notional income

ACIT(CENTRAL)-1, BHOPAL vs. M/S. BANSAL CONSTRUCTION WORK (P) LTD., BHOPAL

In the result, the appeal of the Department is dismissed

ITA 822/IND/2018[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Indore11 Jan 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: SHRI SIDDHARTHA NAUTIYAL, JUDICIAL MEBER, SHRI B.M. BIYANI, ACCOUNTNT MEMBER The ACIT, Central-I, Bhopal

For Appellant: Shri Anil Khabya, A.RFor Respondent: Shri P.K. Mitra, CIT-D.R
Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 801Section 80ISection 92Section 92BSection 92E

section 139(1) Explanation 2 "due date" for the assessee is 30th November of the assessment year. The assessee has filed copy of Audit Report in Form 3CB u/s 92E of the Act in order to support his claim about 'due date'. On the basis of documents made available, I have no hesitation in holding that 'due date' for filing