BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

28 results for “disallowance”+ Section 275clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi714Mumbai631Bangalore172Chennai168Ahmedabad159Kolkata132Cochin109Jaipur104Chandigarh57Hyderabad52Surat47Raipur33Pune30Indore28Nagpur23Karnataka20Cuttack20Amritsar18Lucknow15Rajkot14Ranchi12Jodhpur10Guwahati10Visakhapatnam8Telangana5Calcutta5Jabalpur4Patna4Panaji4Allahabad3Varanasi3Agra3SC2Dehradun1Rajasthan1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)40Section 26333Section 12A24Addition to Income21Disallowance12Section 14711Section 143(2)11Section 1489Deduction8Section 132(4)

RVR TECHNOLOGIES LTD.,MANDIDEEP vs. ITO-2(1), BHOPAL

In the result, appeal for A

ITA 277/IND/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Indore30 May 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 271E

disallow the said claim without any new facts or record is not permissible being change of opinion. Hence, we hold that the reopening of the assessment is not valid and the same is quashed. Since the reopening of the assessment is quashed therefore, the issues raised by the assessee on merits becomes infructuous. 6. For A.Y.2009-10 the assessee has raised

RVR TECHNOLOGIES LTD.,MANDIDEEP vs. ADDL. CIT-RANGE-3, BHOPAL

In the result, appeal for A

Showing 1–20 of 28 · Page 1 of 2

7
Section 271A7
Penalty6
ITA 276/IND/2023[2009-10]Status: Disposed
ITAT Indore
30 May 2024
AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 271E

disallow the said claim without any new facts or record is not permissible being change of opinion. Hence, we hold that the reopening of the assessment is not valid and the same is quashed. Since the reopening of the assessment is quashed therefore, the issues raised by the assessee on merits becomes infructuous. 6. For A.Y.2009-10 the assessee has raised

RVR TECHNOLOGIES LTD.,MANDIDEEP vs. ACIT-3(1), BHOPAL

In the result, appeal for A

ITA 275/IND/2023[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Indore30 May 2024AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 271E

disallow the said claim without any new facts or record is not permissible being change of opinion. Hence, we hold that the reopening of the assessment is not valid and the same is quashed. Since the reopening of the assessment is quashed therefore, the issues raised by the assessee on merits becomes infructuous. 6. For A.Y.2009-10 the assessee has raised

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -5(1), INDORE vs. M/S SUNDERDEEP CONSTRUCTIONS PVT. LTD. , INDORE

In the result both the appeals of the revenue vide ITA No

ITA 786/IND/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Indore09 Mar 2021AY 2013-14

Bench: Hon’Ble Kul Bharat & Hon’Ble Manish Borad

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)

275/- only once. The combined reading of these sections provides that the appellate authority may direct for re-computation of total income to give effect to a finding in an order passed by it under an appeal. 15. Up to assessment year 2012-13, assessee had charged actual expenditure incurred on development of land to the Profit and Loss account

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -5(1), INDORE vs. M/S SUNDERDEEP CONSTRUCTIONS PVT. LTD. , INDORE

In the result both the appeals of the revenue vide ITA No

ITA 784/IND/2018[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Indore09 Mar 2021AY 2010-11

Bench: Hon’Ble Kul Bharat & Hon’Ble Manish Borad

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)

275/- only once. The combined reading of these sections provides that the appellate authority may direct for re-computation of total income to give effect to a finding in an order passed by it under an appeal. 15. Up to assessment year 2012-13, assessee had charged actual expenditure incurred on development of land to the Profit and Loss account

M/S RADHISHWARI DEVLOPERS P LTD,INDORE vs. PR CIT -2 INDORE, INDORE

In the result, Assessee’s appeal in ITANo

ITA 493/IND/2018[13-14]Status: DisposedITAT Indore20 Jul 2021

Bench: Hon’Ble Rajpal Yadav & Hon’Ble Manish Boradvirtual Hearing Assessment Year 2013-14 M/S. Radhishwari Developers P. Ltd. (Now Known As R.C. Warehousing Pvt. Ltd. ) Indore : Appellant Pan :Aafcr1916A V/S Pr. Cito-2 : Respondent Indore Appellant By S/Shri Sumit Nema Sr. Adv. With Gagan Tiwari & Piyush Parashar Advs. Revenue By Shri S.S. Mantri, Cit-Dr Date Of Hearing 24.05.2021 Date Of Pronouncement 20.07.2021

Section 133(6)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 263

disallowing said payments under section 40A (3)- Whether on facts, impugned revisional order did not require any interference- Held, yes [Para-16] [ In favour of revenue] 4.0 Therefore, in view of the above discussion I am of the considered opinion that the order dated: 06.01.2016 for A.Y. 2013-14 is erroneous in so far as it is also prejudicial

SHRI SURENDRA SINGH BHATIA,INDORE vs. THE JCIT-3, INDORE

In the result, assessee’s appeal is allowed

ITA 252/IND/2017[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Indore24 Nov 2022AY 2008-09

Bench: Ms. Madhumita Roy & Shri Bhagirath Mal Biyani

For Appellant: Shri Sumit Nema, Sr. Advocate with Shri Gagan TiwariFor Respondent: 28.09.2022
Section 132Section 132(4)Section 143Section 143(1)Section 271ASection 271DSection 274Section 41(1)

disallowances ouf of various expenses claimed by the appellant whereas the remaining addition of Rs.8,83,283/- was made by invoking the provisions of S.14A of the Act. The AO while passing the assessment order also initiated penalty proceedings under S.271AAA of the Act. A copy of the assessment order has already been furnished by the appellant along with

SANDHVA DIHGE ,DEWAS vs. DCIT CPC BENGALURU, BENGALURU

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 244/IND/2021[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Indore30 Mar 2022AY 2018-19

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Kamble & Shri Bhagirath Mal Biyani

For Appellant: Shri S.S. Deshpandey, C.AFor Respondent: Shri R.P. Maurya, Sr. D.R
Section 143(1)Section 143(1)(a)Section 2Section 36(1)(va)Section 37(7)Section 43B

275, M.G. Road, CPC, Bengaluru. Behind Love Kush Hospital, Dewas – 455 001. (M.P.) [PAN – AFRPD 3986 J] (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant by : Shri S.S. Deshpandey, C.A. Respondent by : Shri R.P. Maurya, Sr. D.R. Date of hearing : 23.02.2022 Date of pronouncement : 30.03.2022 O R D E R PER SUCHITRA KAMBLE, JUDICIAL MEMBER : This appeal is filed by the assessee against the order

M/S INDORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,INDORE vs. THE DCIT, 5(1), INDORE

In the result, appeal of the revenue for A

ITA 847/IND/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Indore31 Oct 2019AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Manish Boradassessment Years: 2011-12 Indore Development Authority, Dcit-5(1) बनाम/ Ida Building,7, Race Course Indore Vs. Road, Indore (Appellant) (Revenue) Pan: Aaaji0103J Assessment Year: 2011-12 Dcit- Indore Development Authority, बनाम/ (Exemption) Ida Building,7, Race Course Vs. Road, Indore Bhopal (Revenue) (Respondent) Pan: Aaaji0103J Assessment Years: 2012-13 Indore Development Authority, Dcit-5(1) बनाम/ Ida Building,7, Race Course Indore Vs. Road, Indore (Appellant) (Revenue)

Section 11Section 12ASection 139Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 38Section 6

section 12AI12AA of the Income Tax Act, 1961, the income of the appellant Authority should be computed in accordance with the provisions of ss. 11 & 12 of the Income- Tax Act, 1961. 2(a) That, the learned CIT(A) grossly erred, both on facts and in law, in confirming the addition of Rs.l6,18,275/- made by the Assessing Officer

THE DCIT(EXEMPTION), BHOPAL vs. M/S. INDORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, INDORE

In the result, appeal of the revenue for A

ITA 870/IND/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Indore31 Oct 2019AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Manish Boradassessment Years: 2011-12 Indore Development Authority, Dcit-5(1) बनाम/ Ida Building,7, Race Course Indore Vs. Road, Indore (Appellant) (Revenue) Pan: Aaaji0103J Assessment Year: 2011-12 Dcit- Indore Development Authority, बनाम/ (Exemption) Ida Building,7, Race Course Vs. Road, Indore Bhopal (Revenue) (Respondent) Pan: Aaaji0103J Assessment Years: 2012-13 Indore Development Authority, Dcit-5(1) बनाम/ Ida Building,7, Race Course Indore Vs. Road, Indore (Appellant) (Revenue)

Section 11Section 12ASection 139Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 38Section 6

section 12AI12AA of the Income Tax Act, 1961, the income of the appellant Authority should be computed in accordance with the provisions of ss. 11 & 12 of the Income- Tax Act, 1961. 2(a) That, the learned CIT(A) grossly erred, both on facts and in law, in confirming the addition of Rs.l6,18,275/- made by the Assessing Officer

M/S INDORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,INDORE vs. THE ACIT (EXEMPTION) CIRCLE, BHOPAL

In the result, appeal of the revenue for A

ITA 1355/IND/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Indore31 Oct 2019AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Manish Boradassessment Years: 2011-12 Indore Development Authority, Dcit-5(1) बनाम/ Ida Building,7, Race Course Indore Vs. Road, Indore (Appellant) (Revenue) Pan: Aaaji0103J Assessment Year: 2011-12 Dcit- Indore Development Authority, बनाम/ (Exemption) Ida Building,7, Race Course Vs. Road, Indore Bhopal (Revenue) (Respondent) Pan: Aaaji0103J Assessment Years: 2012-13 Indore Development Authority, Dcit-5(1) बनाम/ Ida Building,7, Race Course Indore Vs. Road, Indore (Appellant) (Revenue)

Section 11Section 12ASection 139Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 38Section 6

section 12AI12AA of the Income Tax Act, 1961, the income of the appellant Authority should be computed in accordance with the provisions of ss. 11 & 12 of the Income- Tax Act, 1961. 2(a) That, the learned CIT(A) grossly erred, both on facts and in law, in confirming the addition of Rs.l6,18,275/- made by the Assessing Officer

SHRI VINOD BHANDARI,INDORE vs. THE PR.CIT-1, INDORE

In the result appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 350/IND/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Indore20 Mar 2020AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Manish Boradassessment Year: 2012-13 Shri Vinod Bhandari, Pr. Cit(1), Indore 21- Gf, Bhandari House, Talkies, Scheme No.54, Vs. Vijay Nagar, Indore (Appellant) (Revenue ) Pan No.Abnpb6240M Assessment Year: 2012-13

Section 133ASection 139(4)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 263Section 57

disallowance of excess interest u/s 57 d. Details of amounts appearing in 26AS Statement 4. Further the A.O had - in its show cause notice dt./ 18/03/2015 also mentioned interest amount of Rs. 3479097/- in addition to Rs.7.00 Crores surrendered during the Survey. From all the above it is clear that the A.D had obtained the details of all the heads

DR. VINOD BHANDARI,INDORE vs. THE DCIT CIR. 2(1), INDORE

In the result appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 57/IND/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Indore20 Mar 2020AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Manish Boradassessment Year: 2012-13 Shri Vinod Bhandari, Pr. Cit(1), Indore 21- Gf, Bhandari House, Talkies, Scheme No.54, Vs. Vijay Nagar, Indore (Appellant) (Revenue ) Pan No.Abnpb6240M Assessment Year: 2012-13

Section 133ASection 139(4)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 263Section 57

disallowance of excess interest u/s 57 d. Details of amounts appearing in 26AS Statement 4. Further the A.O had - in its show cause notice dt./ 18/03/2015 also mentioned interest amount of Rs. 3479097/- in addition to Rs.7.00 Crores surrendered during the Survey. From all the above it is clear that the A.D had obtained the details of all the heads

DR. VINOD BHANDARI,INDORE vs. THE ACIT CIR. 2(1), INDORE

In the result appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 66/IND/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Indore20 Mar 2020AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Manish Boradassessment Year: 2012-13 Shri Vinod Bhandari, Pr. Cit(1), Indore 21- Gf, Bhandari House, Talkies, Scheme No.54, Vs. Vijay Nagar, Indore (Appellant) (Revenue ) Pan No.Abnpb6240M Assessment Year: 2012-13

Section 133ASection 139(4)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 263Section 57

disallowance of excess interest u/s 57 d. Details of amounts appearing in 26AS Statement 4. Further the A.O had - in its show cause notice dt./ 18/03/2015 also mentioned interest amount of Rs. 3479097/- in addition to Rs.7.00 Crores surrendered during the Survey. From all the above it is clear that the A.D had obtained the details of all the heads

SHRI RAJYAVARDHAN SINGH,INDORE vs. THE ACIT CIRCLE 5(1), INDORE

In the result, both the appeal of assessee in ITANo

ITA 421/IND/2017[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Indore22 Jan 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: Hon'Ble Kul Bharat & And Hon'Ble Manish Borad

Section 54FSection 68Section 91

disallowance of Section 54F, Rs. l1.11lakhs on account of 50 C and Rs. 28.73 on account of section 68 as per his predessor's order in Appeal nO.IT /783/11-12 dated 28.02.2014, against which the Appellant's appeal bearing No. ITA/379/IND/2014 is pending before the Hon'ble Tribunal. 8.On the Facts and circumstances of the case, the Ld. CIT (A) Shri

SHRI RAJYAVARDHAN SINGH,INDORE vs. THE ACIT CIRCLE 5(1), INDORE

In the result, both the appeal of assessee in ITANo

ITA 420/IND/2017[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Indore22 Jan 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: Hon'Ble Kul Bharat & And Hon'Ble Manish Borad

Section 54FSection 68Section 91

disallowance of Section 54F, Rs. l1.11lakhs on account of 50 C and Rs. 28.73 on account of section 68 as per his predessor's order in Appeal nO.IT /783/11-12 dated 28.02.2014, against which the Appellant's appeal bearing No. ITA/379/IND/2014 is pending before the Hon'ble Tribunal. 8.On the Facts and circumstances of the case, the Ld. CIT (A) Shri

ISHA AGRAWAL,KHARGONE vs. PCIT-INDORE-1, INDORE

In the result, both of the issues are remanded to the file of PCIT for a

ITA 457/IND/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Indore24 Feb 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri B.M. Biyani & Shri Dinesh Mohan Sinhaassessment Year:2015-16 Isha Agrawal, Pcit-1, 1, Aurangpura, Indore बनाम/ Khargone Vs. (Assessee/Appellant) (Revenue/Respondent) Pan: Agfpa1915P Assessee By Shri Anil Garg & Shri Ayush Garg, Ars Revenue By Shri Ram Kumar Yadav, Cit-Dr Date Of Hearing 04.02.2025 Date Of Pronouncement 24.02.2025

Section 147Section 148Section 263Section 44A

disallowance of interest paid thereon automatically follows and is always made by assessing authorities. (iii) That, the assessee has filed return of income declaring business income of Rs. 1,54,027/- on turnover of Rs. 11,85,275/- under presumptive scheme of section

MILLION TRADERS BHOPAL P LTD,BHOPAL vs. THE ACIT,CPC,BENGALURU, BENGALURU

In the result, the appeal of assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 124/IND/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Indore12 Oct 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

Section 143(1)Section 234B

275 (Andhra Pradesh) v. M/s Jai Ambey Wines, Ajmer v. The ACIT, Circle -2. Ajmer (Order dated 11/01/2017 passed in ITA No. 676/JP/2015 by Coordinate bench at Jaipur). vi.Hotel Ashok Garden, Dharwad v. ITO, Hubli (Order dated 06/02/2023 passed in ITA No. 12 to 15/Bang/2023 vii. Commissioner of Income Tax-15, v. Relcom [2015] 62 Taxmann.com 190 (Delhi) viii.Naresh Bhavani

MILLION TRADERS BHOPAL P LTD,BHOPAL vs. THE ACIT,CPC,BENGALURU, BENGALURU

In the result, the appeal of assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 125/IND/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Indore12 Oct 2023AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

Section 143(1)Section 234B

275 (Andhra Pradesh) v. M/s Jai Ambey Wines, Ajmer v. The ACIT, Circle -2. Ajmer (Order dated 11/01/2017 passed in ITA No. 676/JP/2015 by Coordinate bench at Jaipur). vi.Hotel Ashok Garden, Dharwad v. ITO, Hubli (Order dated 06/02/2023 passed in ITA No. 12 to 15/Bang/2023 vii. Commissioner of Income Tax-15, v. Relcom [2015] 62 Taxmann.com 190 (Delhi) viii.Naresh Bhavani

M/S SHREE JAIRAM EDUCATION SOCIETY,BHOPAL vs. ACIT CENTRAL-II, BHOPAL

In the result, appeal of the assessee in ITANo

ITA 548/IND/2019[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Indore13 Oct 2021AY 2010-11

Bench: Hon’Ble Rajpal Yadav & Shri Manish Boradvirtual Hearing

Section 12ASection 132Section 143(2)Section 148Section 37

disallowance of expenditure of Rs. 3,25,94,416 which pertains to running and maintaining the educational institute. Department is not in appeal against this relief granted by the Ld. CIT(A). [PB 116] For the addition made on account of concealment of fees of Rs. 69,70,505, Ld. CIT(A) restricted this addition