BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “disallowance”+ Section 194A(3)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai242Delhi159Bangalore140Kolkata89Chennai75Ahmedabad68Pune61Hyderabad52Chandigarh47Cochin47Visakhapatnam39Cuttack35Jaipur34Rajkot23Raipur22Surat19Jodhpur12Guwahati12Nagpur12Amritsar10Panaji5Ranchi4Allahabad4Indore4Karnataka3Lucknow3SC2Jabalpur1Patna1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)9Section 80P(2)(d)4Section 40a3Disallowance3Section 253(5)2Section 402Section 143(2)2Depreciation2

ADIM JATI SEWA SAHKARI SAMITI MYDT JOBAT,ALIRAJPUR vs. FACELESS ASSESSMENT OFFICER, ALIRAJPUR

ITA 663/IND/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Indore27 Mar 2026AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri B.M. Biyani & Shri Paresh M. Joshiadim Jati Sewa Sahkari Samiti National Faceless बनाम/ Mydt., Assessment Centre Vs. 01, Jobat, Jobat, Delhi Alirajpur (Assessee/Appellant) (Revenue/Respondent) Pan: Aaala0577E Assessee By Shri P.D. Nagar, Ar Revenue By Shri Ashish Porwal, Sr. Dr

Section 143(3)Section 253(5)Section 80P(2)(d)Section 80P(4)

3) r.w.s. 147/263 of the Act, disallowing the interest income earned by the assessee by way of FD investment in other Co-op. Society, i.e. Gujarat State Co-op. Bank Ltd. (GSCB) and the rental income from HUDCO and SHARK Systems, which were claimed by the assessee u/s 80P(2)(d) of the Act. Page 8 of 34 Adim Jati

ITO4(4), INDORE vs. SHRI KAILASH LADDHA, INDORE

Appeal are allowed

ITA 963/IND/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Indore19 Oct 2020AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Kul Bharatassessment Year: 2012-13 Ito-4(4) Shri Kailash Laddha Indore बनाम/ (Revenue) (Respondent) Vs. P.A. No.Abapl7530R Revenue By Shri R.P. Maurya, Sr. Dr Respondent By S/Shri Kanak Tibrewala & Kamal Jain Ars Date Of Hearing: 15.10.2020 Date Of Pronouncement: 19.10.2020

Section 143(3)Section 144Section 194ASection 253(2)Section 40aSection 44A

disallowance of Rs.4,03,600/-. 5. Ld. Departmental Representative (DR) vehemently argued and supported the order of the assessing officer. 6. Per contra, Ld. counsel for the assessee relied on the decision of the Ld. CIT(A) and further submitted that the assessing officer grossly erred in invoking the provision of section 40a(ia) of the Act. Moreover

THE ACIT 1(1), UJJAIN vs. M/S PARAG FANS & COOLING SYSTEMS LTD., DEWAS

In the result appeals of the Revenue in ITA Nos

ITA 561/IND/2018[12-13]Status: DisposedITAT Indore09 Feb 2021

Bench: Hon'Ble Kul Bharat & Hon'Ble Manish Borad

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 40

3) 21 ITJ 372 (Trib. - Indore)- Employees contribution to provident Fund- Employees contribution to Provident Fund –Employees contribution to Provident Fund - Deletion of second proviso to section 43B- HELD-In view of CIT v Alom Extrusions Ltd. (2010) 14 ITJ 133(SC), deletion of second proviso is retrospective-Therefore, even if employees contribution is deposited before due date of filing

THE ACIT 1(1), UJJAIN vs. M/S PARAG FANS & COOLING SYSTEMS LTD., DEWAS

In the result appeals of the Revenue in ITA Nos

ITA 562/IND/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Indore09 Feb 2021AY 2014-15

Bench: Hon'Ble Kul Bharat & Hon'Ble Manish Borad

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 40

3) 21 ITJ 372 (Trib. - Indore)- Employees contribution to provident Fund- Employees contribution to Provident Fund –Employees contribution to Provident Fund - Deletion of second proviso to section 43B- HELD-In view of CIT v Alom Extrusions Ltd. (2010) 14 ITJ 133(SC), deletion of second proviso is retrospective-Therefore, even if employees contribution is deposited before due date of filing