BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

46 results for “disallowance”+ Section 17(1)(va)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi744Mumbai402Kolkata337Jaipur270Bangalore243Chennai214Ahmedabad154Chandigarh111Raipur101Pune87Hyderabad73Agra65Nagpur65Amritsar60Surat50Lucknow49Indore46Guwahati23Jodhpur23Cochin18Cuttack18Visakhapatnam15Rajkot12Varanasi11Ranchi7Allahabad6Karnataka6Dehradun4SC4Rajasthan3Jabalpur3Patna2Telangana2Punjab & Haryana1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)74Section 14746Section 6834Disallowance30Section 43B25Addition to Income22Section 80I20Section 143(1)19Section 36(1)(va)19Section 263

ACIT-5(1), INDORE vs. S T I INDIA LTD., INDORE

Appeals are disposed of as under:

ITA 784/IND/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Indore24 Aug 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

section 43(1) as also the judicial rulings cited by Ld. AR. After a mindful consideration, we find that the case of assessee is directly and fully covered by all decisions cited by Ld. AR, the relevant paragraphs of the decisions are already extracted earlier and we need not re-produce here again. Regarding the decision of Hon’ble Supreme

S T I INDIA LTD.,INDORE vs. ACIT-5(1), INDORE

Appeals are disposed of as under:

ITA 12/IND/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Indore24 Aug 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

section 43(1) as also the judicial rulings cited by Ld. AR. After a mindful consideration, we find that the case of assessee is directly and fully covered by all decisions cited by Ld. AR, the relevant paragraphs of the decisions are already extracted earlier and we need not re-produce here again. Regarding the decision of Hon’ble Supreme

Showing 1–20 of 46 · Page 1 of 3

18
Depreciation12
Deduction12

S T I INDIA LTD.,INDORE vs. ACIT-5(1), INDORE

Appeals are disposed of as under:

ITA 13/IND/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Indore24 Aug 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

section 43(1) as also the judicial rulings cited by Ld. AR. After a mindful consideration, we find that the case of assessee is directly and fully covered by all decisions cited by Ld. AR, the relevant paragraphs of the decisions are already extracted earlier and we need not re-produce here again. Regarding the decision of Hon’ble Supreme

ACIT-5(1), INDORE vs. S T I INDIA LTD., INDORE

Appeals are disposed of as under:

ITA 23/IND/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Indore24 Aug 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

section 43(1) as also the judicial rulings cited by Ld. AR. After a mindful consideration, we find that the case of assessee is directly and fully covered by all decisions cited by Ld. AR, the relevant paragraphs of the decisions are already extracted earlier and we need not re-produce here again. Regarding the decision of Hon’ble Supreme

S T I INDIA LTD.,INDORE vs. ACIT-5(1), INDORE

Appeals are disposed of as under:

ITA 11/IND/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Indore24 Aug 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

section 43(1) as also the judicial rulings cited by Ld. AR. After a mindful consideration, we find that the case of assessee is directly and fully covered by all decisions cited by Ld. AR, the relevant paragraphs of the decisions are already extracted earlier and we need not re-produce here again. Regarding the decision of Hon’ble Supreme

ACIT-5(1), INDORE vs. S T I INDIA LTD., INDORE

Appeals are disposed of as under:

ITA 24/IND/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Indore24 Aug 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

section 43(1) as also the judicial rulings cited by Ld. AR. After a mindful consideration, we find that the case of assessee is directly and fully covered by all decisions cited by Ld. AR, the relevant paragraphs of the decisions are already extracted earlier and we need not re-produce here again. Regarding the decision of Hon’ble Supreme

S T I INDIA LTD.,INDORE vs. ACIT-5(1), INDORE

Appeals are disposed of as under:

ITA 850/IND/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Indore24 Aug 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

section 43(1) as also the judicial rulings cited by Ld. AR. After a mindful consideration, we find that the case of assessee is directly and fully covered by all decisions cited by Ld. AR, the relevant paragraphs of the decisions are already extracted earlier and we need not re-produce here again. Regarding the decision of Hon’ble Supreme

ACIT-5(1), INDORE vs. S T I INDIA LTD., INDORE

Appeals are disposed of as under:

ITA 22/IND/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Indore24 Aug 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

section 43(1) as also the judicial rulings cited by Ld. AR. After a mindful consideration, we find that the case of assessee is directly and fully covered by all decisions cited by Ld. AR, the relevant paragraphs of the decisions are already extracted earlier and we need not re-produce here again. Regarding the decision of Hon’ble Supreme

SHRI VIJENDRA KUMAR TIWARI ,INDORE vs. THE CIT NFAC , DELHI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 175/IND/2021[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Indore30 Mar 2022AY 2018-19

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Kamble & Shri Bhagirath Mal Biyani

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Ram Maurya, D.R
Section 143(1)Section 2(24)(x)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

17,087/- after disallowance of Rs. 23,03,667/- under Section 36(1)(va) of the Act. A.Y. 2018-19 Page

JILA SAHAKARI KENDRIYA BANK MYDT,SEHORE, MP vs. COMMISIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS), NFAC, DELHI

Appeal is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 407/IND/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Indore10 Apr 2026AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri B.M. Biyani & Shri Paresh M. Joshiassessment Year:2014-15 Jila Sahakari Kendriya Cit(A), Nfac, Delhi / Bank Mydt, Acit-3(1), Bhopal बनाम/ Sehore, M.P. Vs. (Assessee/Appellant) (Revenue/Respondent) Pan: Aaalj0022F Assessee By Shri Gagan Tiwari, Ar Revenue By Shri Ashish Porwal, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 26.02.2026 Date Of Pronouncement 10.04.2026

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 36(1)(va)Section 36(1)(viia)Section 43B

section 2(24)(x) r.w.s. 36(1)(va). 14. Presently, the assessee is making a limited claim that the amount of Rs. 50,500/- is not fully on account of employee’s contribution, it also has Page 16 of 18 Jila Sahakari Kendriya Bank Mydt, Sehore ITA No. 407/Ind/2024 – AY 2014-15 component of employer’s contribution which

TORINO LABORATORIES P LTD,INDORE vs. DCIT/ / ACIT 4 (1), INDORE

In the result, the appeal of assessee is allowed

ITA 6/IND/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Indore18 Aug 2022AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Mahavir Prasad & Shri B.M. Biyani(Conducted Through Virtual Court) Assessment Year: 2018-19 Torino Laboratories Pvt. Ltd. Dcit/Acit-4(1), Indore Indore Vs. (Appellant / Assessee) (Respondent/ Revenue) Pan: Aabct1347B Assessee By Shri Ashish Goyal, Ar Revenue By Shri Ashish Porwal, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 08.08.2022 Date Of Pronouncement 18.08.2022 O R D E R Per B.M. Biyani, A.M.:

Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(1)(iv)Section 2Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

section 36(1)(va) has not application. The Ld. DR agreed to the submission of Ld. AR. Thus, the entire disallowance of Rs. 1,89,194/- consisting of employees’ contribution as well as employer’s contribution is hereby deleted. 17

THE DCIT-CENTRAL-2, INDORE vs. M/S. KALYAN TOLL INFRASTRUCTURE LTD., INDORE

In the result all the grounds raised by Revenue in the case of

ITA 878/IND/2019[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Indore23 Sept 2020AY 2010-11

Bench: Hon’Ble Kul Bharat & Hon’Ble Manish Boradassessment Year 2010-11

Section 132Section 132(4)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 271(1)(c)Section 274Section 36

section 271(1)(c). (Ram Kumar Yadav) Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax (Central) Indore 19. From going through the above notice it is well evident that in the notice the specific charge/limb u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act was not mentioned. The Ld. A.O has not striked off one of the charge which is not relevant to the assessee

THE DCIT (CENTRAL), INDORE vs. M/S KETI CONSTRUCTION (INDIA) LTD. , INDORE

In the result all the grounds raised by Revenue in the case of

ITA 877/IND/2019[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Indore23 Sept 2020AY 2008-09

Bench: Hon’Ble Kul Bharat & Hon’Ble Manish Boradassessment Year 2010-11

Section 132Section 132(4)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 271(1)(c)Section 274Section 36

section 271(1)(c). (Ram Kumar Yadav) Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax (Central) Indore 19. From going through the above notice it is well evident that in the notice the specific charge/limb u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act was not mentioned. The Ld. A.O has not striked off one of the charge which is not relevant to the assessee

RVR TECHNOLOGIES LTD.,MANDIDEEP vs. ADDL. CIT-RANGE-3, BHOPAL

In the result, appeal for A

ITA 276/IND/2023[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Indore30 May 2024AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 271E

17 of 25 ITANo.275 to 277/Ind/2023 RVT Technologies Ltd. Court or the Supreme Court is received by the "[Principal Chief Commissioner or] Chief Commissioner or the "[Principal Commissioner or] Commissioner or the order of revision under section 263 or section 264 is passed; Provided further that the provisions of sub-section (2) of section 274 shall apply in respect

RVR TECHNOLOGIES LTD.,MANDIDEEP vs. ITO-2(1), BHOPAL

In the result, appeal for A

ITA 277/IND/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Indore30 May 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 271E

17 of 25 ITANo.275 to 277/Ind/2023 RVT Technologies Ltd. Court or the Supreme Court is received by the "[Principal Chief Commissioner or] Chief Commissioner or the "[Principal Commissioner or] Commissioner or the order of revision under section 263 or section 264 is passed; Provided further that the provisions of sub-section (2) of section 274 shall apply in respect

RVR TECHNOLOGIES LTD.,MANDIDEEP vs. ACIT-3(1), BHOPAL

In the result, appeal for A

ITA 275/IND/2023[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Indore30 May 2024AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 271E

17 of 25 ITANo.275 to 277/Ind/2023 RVT Technologies Ltd. Court or the Supreme Court is received by the "[Principal Chief Commissioner or] Chief Commissioner or the "[Principal Commissioner or] Commissioner or the order of revision under section 263 or section 264 is passed; Provided further that the provisions of sub-section (2) of section 274 shall apply in respect

NEW VISION SOFTEOCOM & CONSULTABCY P LTD ,BHOPAL vs. THE DCIT/ACIT 3(1) , BHOPAL

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 203/IND/2021[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Indore22 Feb 2023AY 2019-20

Bench: The Last Date Of Filing The Income Tax Return U/S 139(1) Of The Act As Required By Section 43B(B) For Allowability Of Deduction On Actual Payment Basis.

For Appellant: Shri Aditya & Ajay Chhajad, A.RFor Respondent: Shri P.K. Mishra, CIT-D.R
Section 139(1)Section 143Section 234ASection 250Section 36Section 36(1)(va)Section 43Section 43B

17-10-2019, showing total income of ₹ 43,72,550/-. Thereafter, CPC Bangalore processed the return and an intimation under section 143 (1) of the Act was passed on 01-05- 2020. The income has been assessed at ₹ 49, 31,690/- by making disallowance of claim of ₹ 5,23,920/- in respect of employee’s contribution towards provident fund

M/S TESLA TRANSFORMERS (INDIA) LTD,BHOPAL vs. ACIT 3(1) BHOPAL, BHOPAL

In the result, appeal of assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 190/IND/2022[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Indore02 Mar 2023AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyanim/S. Tesla Transformers Acit 3(1) (India) Ltd. Bhopal Vs. Bhopal (Appellant / Assessee) (Respondent/ Revenue) Pan: Aagct 8705 J Assessee By None Revenue By Shri Ashish Porwal, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 28.02.2023 Date Of Pronouncement 02.03.2023

Section 115BSection 143(1)

disallowance of delayed payment on account of ESI/PF. 7. The assessee has claimed that the payments towards Employees Contribution were made before due date filing of return of income u/s 139(1) of the Income Tax Act. However, it is not disputed that there was a delay in payment as per respective acts of ESI/PF. This fact is recorded

SHIVGANGA DRILLERS P LTD,INDORE vs. CPC , BENGALURU

In the result, the appeal of assessee is allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 174/IND/2021[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Indore17 May 2022AY 2017-18

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Kamble & Shri Bhagirath Mal Biyani

For Appellant: Shri Prakash Jain & Shreya Jain, A.RsFor Respondent: Shri R.P. Maurya, Sr. D.R
Section 143(1)Section 154Section 199Section 234BSection 36

va): “Explanation 2.—For the removal of doubts, it is hereby clarified that the provisions of section 43B shall not apply and shall be deemed never to have been applied for the purposes of determining the "due date" under this clause; Section 43B: “Explanation 5.—For the removal of doubts, it is hereby clarified that the provisions of this section

ACIT CENTRAL-2, INDORE vs. SHRI SANJAY SHUKLA, INDORE

In the result, appeal of the assessee in ITANo

ITA 49/IND/2021[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Indore15 Mar 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Mahavir Prasad & Shri Manish Boradvirtual Hearing Assessment Year:2013-14 Shri Sanjay Shukla, Acit Central Circle 2, बनाम/ Indore Indore Vs. (Appellant) (Respondent ) P.A. No.Ahqps8882D Assessment Year:2013-14 Acit Central Circle 2, Shri Sanjay Shukla, बनाम/ Indore Indore Vs. (Appellant) (Respondent ) P.A. No.Ahqps8882D Assessee By Shri Pankaj Shah, Ca Revenue By Shri P.K. Mitra, Cit-Dr Date Of Hearing: 21.01.2022 Date Of Pronouncement: 15.03..2022 आदेश / O R D E R

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 68

17. Apropos to ground no.7 relating to disallowance of contribution to Provident Fund u/s 36(1)(va) of the Act at Rs. 2,80,643/- we find that Ld. CIT(A) has rightly deleted the said disallowance in light of the decisions of this Tribunal in case of DCIT vs. D & H Secheron Electrodes P. Ltd. (ITANo.172/Ind/2011), Som Distilleries & Breweries