BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “disallowance”+ Section 12A(1)(ac)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi32Kolkata23Mumbai20Jaipur13Pune10Raipur9Chennai7Bangalore7Ahmedabad5Indore4Hyderabad3Lucknow2Guwahati2SC2Chandigarh1Amritsar1Surat1Jodhpur1Dehradun1Cochin1

Key Topics

Section 12A18Section 104Section 80G4Section 113Section 143(3)3Section 12A(1)(ac)2Section 80G(5)2Section 80G(5)(ix)2Exemption2Deduction

DISHA EDUCATION SOCIETY,RAIPUR vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, EXEMPTION, BHOPAL

In the result, both appeals of assessee are allowed

ITA 165/IND/2023[00]Status: DisposedITAT Indore22 Nov 2023

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)Section 80GSection 80G(5)Section 80G(5)(ix)

ac) of sub-section (1) of section 12A, shall,— (a) where the application is made under sub-clause (i) of the Page 9 of 14 ITA No.164 & 165/Ind/2023 Disha Education Society Page 10 of 14 said clause, pass an order in writing registering the trust or institution for a period of five years; (b) where the application is made under

THE NIMAR EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY,KHANDWA vs. THE EXEMPTION CIRCLE, BHOPAL

2
Disallowance2
Addition to Income2

In the result, the appeal of assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 162/IND/2022[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Indore14 Jun 2023AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyanithe Nimar Educational Society Cit(E) Harsud Road, Civil Lines Bhopal Vs. East Nimar, Khandwa (Appellant / Assessee) (Revenue) Pan: Aabtt 1409 K Assessee By Shri S.N. Agrwal, Ar Revenue By Shri Ashish Porwal, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 12.04.2023 Date Of Pronouncement 14.06.2023

Section 10Section 11Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)Section 143(3)Section 80G

ac)(i) of the Act which means that the registration is granted in the category where the assessee was already granted registration u/s 12A of the Act. Therefore, this subsequent registration granted by the competent authority corroborates the claim of the assessee that the assessee was already granted registration. Since this issue is neither adjudicated

NAVNEET KUMAR SANCHETI,BHOPAL vs. CIT(A), DELHI

The appeal is allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 495/IND/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Indore23 Jan 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri B.M. Biyani & Shri Udayan Das Guptaassessment Year:2013-14 Navneet Kumar Sancheti Nfac Prop. M/S Navnet Kumar Delhi बनाम/ Sancheti, Krishi Upaj Vs. Mandi Ashta (Assessee/Appellant) (Revenue/Respondent) Pan: Acnps5570J Assessee By Shri Govind Rinwa, Ar Revenue By Shri Ashish Porwal, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 21.01.2025 Date Of Pronouncement 23.01.2025

Section 143(3)Section 154Section 250

disallowance of Rs. 4.24 crores. In absence of any response or representation to the various notices issued from the office of the first appellate authority, on five different dates of hearing , as evident from the appellate order , the appeal has been dismissed by the Ld CIT ( A ) , without adjudication on the grounds of appeal on merits . 5. Now the assessee

DCIT 1(1), INDORE vs. M/S MAA UMIYA AGRITECH PVT. LTD. , INDORE

In the result, appeal of Revenue is dismissed

ITA 89/IND/2022[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Indore08 Jun 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyanidcit 1(1) M/S. Maa Umiya Agritech Pvt. Ltd. Indore 119, A.B. Road, Aloo Pyaj Mandi, Vs. Indore (Appellant / (Revenue) (Assessee) Pan: Aabcn8230F Revenue By Shri P.K. Mishra, Cit-Dr Respondent By Shri S.S. Solanki, Ar Date Of Hearing 11.04.2023 Date Of Pronouncement 08.06.2023

Section 12ASection 138Section 144Section 145

12A of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 and provisos (b) and (c) of section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 and any other laws, which prescribe period(s) of limitation for instituting proceedings, outer limits (within which the court or tribunal can condone delay) and termination of proceedings.” Accordingly, in view of the judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court