Search: disallowance

3 results for “disallowance”+ Section 10A(2)(ia)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai73 Delhi57 Bangalore50 Chennai31 Hyderabad23 Kolkata14 Visakhapatnam9 Jaipur9 Pune9 Amritsar8 Cochin5 Ahmedabad5 Indore3 SC2 Dehradun2 Chandigarh2 Surat2 Rajkot2 Jodhpur1 Nagpur1 Raipur1

Key Topics

Section 14A9 Section 2638 Section 139(1)6 Section 905 Section 143(3)4 Section 104 Section 143(1)4 Section 1392 Disallowance2

INFOBEANS TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED,INDORE, M.P. vs. THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, INDORE - 1, INDORE, M.P.

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed being devoid of

ITA 371/IND/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Indore29 Apr 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Sh. Bhagirath Mal Biyani & Sh. Udayan Dasgupta

For Appellant: S/Sh.SN Agrawal & Ritesh Jain, ARs

Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 14A(2)Section 154Section 263

10A, 10AA) iii. Disallowance u/s 40A(7) (Gratuity provision).” 6. On perusal of assessment records, it was observed by the Ld PCIT that the assessee had exempt income during the year ,amounting to Rs.9,43,733/- ( being dividend income u/s 10(43) ,but there are no disallowance made by the assessee in its 5 I.T.A. No.371/Ind/2024 Infobeans Technologies

INFOBEANS TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED,INDORE, M.P. vs. THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, INDORE - 1, INDORE, M.P.

INFOBEANS TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED,INDORE, M.P. vs. THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, INDORE - 1, INDORE, M.P.

SHRI GUPTNATH BAL SHIKSHAN SAMITI MACHALPUR,MACHALPUR vs. ITO WARD RAJGARH, RAJGARH

ASHA RANI PANDYA,INDORE vs. CPC BANGALORE, BANGALORE