BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

10 results for “depreciation”+ Section 80Iclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai80Delhi63Chennai15Ahmedabad13Indore10Kolkata10Ranchi6Bangalore6Pune4Chandigarh4Telangana3SC3Karnataka2Jaipur1Cochin1Punjab & Haryana1Rajkot1Calcutta1Amritsar1Kerala1

Key Topics

Section 14729Section 143(3)24Section 80I20Section 14815Section 14A12Reassessment6Reopening of Assessment6Disallowance5Addition to Income5Deduction

M/S. SANWARIA AGROILS LIMITED,BHOPAL vs. THE ACIT 1(1), BHOPAL

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 620/IND/2013[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Indore04 May 2017AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Chandra Mohan Garg & Shri O.P.Meena

Section 143Section 147Section 148Section 234BSection 32

depreciation on windmill installed for captive power generation, which is not permissible in law and therefore, the assessment reopened by the AO, after recording reasons for doing so. The copy of the same was also made available to the assessee during asp proceeding wherein the assessee has not taken any objection on this ground. 7. We have heard the rival

ASSISSTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - 4(1), INDORE, INDORE vs. PRATAAP SNACKS LIMITED, INDORE

5
Limitation/Time-bar5
Section 1432

In the result revenue’s appeal is dismissed and assessee’s cross-objection is allowed

ITA 374/IND/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Indore17 Oct 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 80I

80I, the revenue cannot be allowed to turn around and contend that the deduction under the said section is not allowable in respect of the assessment years in question". The S.L.P. filed by the Revenue against this judgment stands dismissed in [2004] 266 ITR 4 [St.]. The principle of consistency has been followed by the other High Courts in several

ASSISSTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - 4(1), INDORE, INDORE vs. PRATAAP SNACKS LIMITED, INDORE

In the result revenue’s appeal is dismissed and assessee’s cross-objection is allowed

ITA 372/IND/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Indore17 Oct 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 80I

80I, the revenue cannot be allowed to turn around and contend that the deduction under the said section is not allowable in respect of the assessment years in question". The S.L.P. filed by the Revenue against this judgment stands dismissed in [2004] 266 ITR 4 [St.]. The principle of consistency has been followed by the other High Courts in several

ASSISSTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - 4(1), INDORE, INDORE vs. PRATAAP SNACKS LIMITED, INDORE

In the result revenue’s appeal is dismissed and assessee’s cross-objection is allowed

ITA 373/IND/2023[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Indore17 Oct 2024AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 80I

80I, the revenue cannot be allowed to turn around and contend that the deduction under the said section is not allowable in respect of the assessment years in question". The S.L.P. filed by the Revenue against this judgment stands dismissed in [2004] 266 ITR 4 [St.]. The principle of consistency has been followed by the other High Courts in several

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - 4(1), INDORE, INDORE vs. PRATAAP SNACKS LIMITED, INDORE

In the result revenue’s appeal is dismissed and assessee’s cross-objection is allowed

ITA 370/IND/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Indore17 Oct 2024AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 80I

80I, the revenue cannot be allowed to turn around and contend that the deduction under the said section is not allowable in respect of the assessment years in question". The S.L.P. filed by the Revenue against this judgment stands dismissed in [2004] 266 ITR 4 [St.]. The principle of consistency has been followed by the other High Courts in several

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - 4(1), INDORE, INDORE vs. PRATAAP SNACKS LIMITED, INDORE

In the result revenue’s appeal is dismissed and assessee’s cross-objection is allowed

ITA 371/IND/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Indore17 Oct 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 80I

80I, the revenue cannot be allowed to turn around and contend that the deduction under the said section is not allowable in respect of the assessment years in question". The S.L.P. filed by the Revenue against this judgment stands dismissed in [2004] 266 ITR 4 [St.]. The principle of consistency has been followed by the other High Courts in several

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 1 (1), INDORE vs. M/S AGRAWAL COAL CORP. PVT. LTD., INDORE

In the result all the three appeals of the revenue are

ITA 803/IND/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Indore28 Nov 2019AY 2014-15

Bench: Hon’Ble Kul Bharat & Hon’Ble Manish Borad

Section 143(3)Section 14A

depreciation as per Income Tax there was net profit in Jodha unit and losses in the two units at Shajapur. In the return of income assessee did not made any claim for deduction u/s 80IA(4)of the Act. During the course of Agrawal Coal Corporation Pvt. Ltd ITA No.801 to 803/Ind/2018, ITA No.778/Ind/2018 & CO Nos.23 &24/Ind/2019 assessment proceedings claim

DCIT !(1) INDORE, INDORE vs. AGRAWAL COAL CORPORATION (P) LTD., INDORE, INDORE

In the result all the three appeals of the revenue are

ITA 802/IND/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Indore28 Nov 2019AY 2013-14

Bench: Hon’Ble Kul Bharat & Hon’Ble Manish Borad

Section 143(3)Section 14A

depreciation as per Income Tax there was net profit in Jodha unit and losses in the two units at Shajapur. In the return of income assessee did not made any claim for deduction u/s 80IA(4)of the Act. During the course of Agrawal Coal Corporation Pvt. Ltd ITA No.801 to 803/Ind/2018, ITA No.778/Ind/2018 & CO Nos.23 &24/Ind/2019 assessment proceedings claim

M/S AGRAWAL COAL CORP. PVT. LTD.,INDORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 1, INDORE

In the result all the three appeals of the revenue are

ITA 778/IND/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Indore28 Nov 2019AY 2012-13

Bench: Hon’Ble Kul Bharat & Hon’Ble Manish Borad

Section 143(3)Section 14A

depreciation as per Income Tax there was net profit in Jodha unit and losses in the two units at Shajapur. In the return of income assessee did not made any claim for deduction u/s 80IA(4)of the Act. During the course of Agrawal Coal Corporation Pvt. Ltd ITA No.801 to 803/Ind/2018, ITA No.778/Ind/2018 & CO Nos.23 &24/Ind/2019 assessment proceedings claim

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 1, INDORE vs. M/S AGRAWAL COAL CORP. PVT. LTD., INDORE

In the result all the three appeals of the revenue are

ITA 801/IND/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Indore28 Nov 2019AY 2012-13

Bench: Hon’Ble Kul Bharat & Hon’Ble Manish Borad

Section 143(3)Section 14A

depreciation as per Income Tax there was net profit in Jodha unit and losses in the two units at Shajapur. In the return of income assessee did not made any claim for deduction u/s 80IA(4)of the Act. During the course of Agrawal Coal Corporation Pvt. Ltd ITA No.801 to 803/Ind/2018, ITA No.778/Ind/2018 & CO Nos.23 &24/Ind/2019 assessment proceedings claim