BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “depreciation”+ Section 5Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai85Delhi61Chennai33Pune31Bangalore29Kolkata21Raipur17Jaipur8Surat7Panaji7Hyderabad6Indore4Ranchi4Ahmedabad3SC3Amritsar2Cochin2Karnataka2Cuttack1Visakhapatnam1Allahabad1Chandigarh1

Key Topics

Section 271(1)(c)16Section 2749Section 153A4Section 132(4)4Depreciation4Penalty4Addition to Income4Section 143(3)3Disallowance3Undisclosed Income

THE DCIT-CENTRAL-2, INDORE vs. M/S. KALYAN TOLL INFRASTRUCTURE LTD., INDORE

In the result all the grounds raised by Revenue in the case of

ITA 878/IND/2019[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Indore23 Sept 2020AY 2010-11

Bench: Hon’Ble Kul Bharat & Hon’Ble Manish Boradassessment Year 2010-11

Section 132Section 132(4)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 271(1)(c)Section 274Section 36

5A to section 271(1)(c) has been referred in Para 3.3 of the penalty order and on other hand Explanation 1 to section 271(1)(c) has also been invoked in Para 3.4 stating that when there is difference between the assessed income and the returned income, there is presumption of concealment or furnishing of inaccurate particulars

3
Section 133A2
Section 362

THE DCIT (CENTRAL), INDORE vs. M/S KETI CONSTRUCTION (INDIA) LTD. , INDORE

In the result all the grounds raised by Revenue in the case of

ITA 877/IND/2019[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Indore23 Sept 2020AY 2008-09

Bench: Hon’Ble Kul Bharat & Hon’Ble Manish Boradassessment Year 2010-11

Section 132Section 132(4)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 271(1)(c)Section 274Section 36

5A to section 271(1)(c) has been referred in Para 3.3 of the penalty order and on other hand Explanation 1 to section 271(1)(c) has also been invoked in Para 3.4 stating that when there is difference between the assessed income and the returned income, there is presumption of concealment or furnishing of inaccurate particulars

THE ACIT (CENTRAL) UJJAIN, UJJAIN vs. M/S. ARIBA FOODS (P) LTD., INDORE

In the result the appeal of revenue is dismissed

ITA 2/IND/2020[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Indore28 Jun 2022AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Mahavir Prasad & Shri Bhagirath Mal Biyani

Section 133ASection 143(3)Section 271(1)(c)Section 274

depreciation on newly installed plant and machinery. The Ld. AO selected case under scrutiny, issued statutory notices and finally completed assessment u/s 143(3) on 26.12.2018. Simultaneously on 26.12.2018, the Ld. AO issued notice u/s 274 read with section 271(1)(c) of the Act for imposition of penalty u/s 271(1)(c). The assessee made submissions in response

DHANRAJ DISTRIBUTORS (P) LTD.,INDORE vs. DCIT (1), INDORE

ITA 950/IND/2019[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Indore22 Jun 2023AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shrib.M. Biyani

Section 27(1)(c)Section 271Section 271(1)(c)Section 274Section 40A(2)Section 68

depreciation; and (iv) disallowance of Rs. 20,000/- out of office, conveyance and travelling expenses. Aggrieved, the assessee carried matter in first-appeal wherein the CIT(A) granted part relief by deleting the addition of last item of Rs. 20,000/-. Subsequently, vide penalty-order dated 30.03.2017, the AO imposed a penalty