NIRVINDHYA SHIKSHA AVAM SANSKRITI PRACHAR SAMITI,RAJGARH vs. ITO, RAJGARH
Appeal is allowed for statistical purpose
ITA 100/IND/2024[A Y 2017-18]Status: HeardITAT Indore10 Sept 2024
Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyaniassessment Year : 2017-18 Nirvindhya Shiksha Avam Income-Tax Officer, Sanskriti Prachar Samiti, Rajgarh Biaora, C/O Adv. Hitesh Chimnani, बनाम/ Ug-37, Trade Centre, Vs. 18,South Tukoganj, Indore. (Assessee/Appellant) (Revenue/Respondent) Pan: Aaaan8371J Assessee By Shri Hitesh Chimnani, Ar Revenue By Shri Ashish Porwal, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 05.09.2024 Date Of Pronouncement 10.09.2024
Section 11Section 11(1)Section 11(6)Section 12ASection 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 270ASection 270A(1)
270A for
charging/computing penalty fails because of the fact that the total income
determined by both assessee and AO was Rs. Nil. If the assessee raises such
a claim, the AO shall also look into the same.
8. Before parting, we would like to deal the 3rd contention raised by Ld.
AR as narrated above. On a careful study