BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “depreciation”+ Section 270A(9)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi141Mumbai77Chandigarh53Ahmedabad40Bangalore21Hyderabad16Pune14Jaipur13Kolkata11Chennai11Guwahati9Raipur6Surat5Lucknow5Indore4Dehradun4Nagpur2Jodhpur2Visakhapatnam2Cuttack1Amritsar1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)5Section 355Section 270A4Disallowance4Section 113Depreciation3Section 143(2)2Penalty2Addition to Income2

BADAUD SHRI VARDHMAN SHIKSHA ,BADAUD vs. THE ITO NFAC DELHI, NEW DELHI

Appeal is allowed

ITA 51/IND/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Indore25 Jul 2023AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyaniassessment Year:2018-19 Badaud Shri Vardhaman Ito, बनाम/ Shiksha Samiti, Nfac, Badaud Delhi Vs. (Assessee / Appellant) (Revenue / Respondent) Pan: Aacab5370 Assessee By Shri Sharad Jain, Ar Revenue By Shri Ashish Porwal, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 19.07.2023 Date Of Pronouncement 25.07.2023

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 270ASection 270A(2)Section 270A(8)

section 270A(2) is also not applicable because in the present case for the reason that the total income was reported by assessee at Rs. Nil which remained Rs. Nil at the time of assessment, it is not a case where the assessment has the effect of reducing the loss or converting loss into income. Ld. AR submitted that

MALWA OXYGEN AND INDUSTRIAL GASES PRIVATE LIMITED ,SECTOR C, INDUSTRIAL AREA vs. AO-RATLAM/INCOME TAX OFFICER, NFAC, RATLAM/DELHI

Appeal is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 713/IND/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Indore07 Oct 2025AY 2018-19
Section 143(3)Section 35Section 35(1)

section 270A(9)(a) of the act for\nmisrepresentation or suppression of facts. Therefore, the penalty provision of\nsection u/s 270A(9)(a) are initiated separately.\n[Disallowance of Rs.78,72,495/-]\n6. During first appeal, the CIT(A) upheld AO's action by passing following\norder:\n“6.1 From the above discussion, it is clear that the appellant failed

NIRVINDHYA SHIKSHA AVAM SANSKRITI PRACHAR SAMITI,RAJGARH vs. ITO, RAJGARH

Appeal is allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 100/IND/2024[A Y 2017-18]Status: HeardITAT Indore10 Sept 2024

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyaniassessment Year : 2017-18 Nirvindhya Shiksha Avam Income-Tax Officer, Sanskriti Prachar Samiti, Rajgarh Biaora, C/O Adv. Hitesh Chimnani, बनाम/ Ug-37, Trade Centre, Vs. 18,South Tukoganj, Indore. (Assessee/Appellant) (Revenue/Respondent) Pan: Aaaan8371J Assessee By Shri Hitesh Chimnani, Ar Revenue By Shri Ashish Porwal, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 05.09.2024 Date Of Pronouncement 10.09.2024

Section 11Section 11(1)Section 11(6)Section 12ASection 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 270ASection 270A(1)

270A for charging/computing penalty fails because of the fact that the total income determined by both assessee and AO was Rs. Nil. If the assessee raises such a claim, the AO shall also look into the same. 8. Before parting, we would like to deal the 3rd contention raised by Ld. AR as narrated above. On a careful study

ACIT-1(1), INDORE vs. KRITI NUTRIENTS LIMITED, INDORE

The appeal of the Revenue is allowed for statistical\npurposes

ITA 780/IND/2024[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Indore09 Jan 2026AY 2021-22
Section 246ASection 250Section 253

270A of the Act for misreporting the\nparticulars of income and u/s 271AAC(1) of the Act, are\nseparately initiated on the issue. (Addition of\nRs.7,2260,000/-)”\nThe Ld. DR has emphasized that no details, no material were\nfurnished by the assessee company that Ld. AO has correctly\npassed the “Impugned Assessment Order”.\nKriti Nutrients Ltd.\nITA No. 780/Ind/2024