BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

7 results for “depreciation”+ Section 246Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai28Chennai24Delhi18Bangalore15Amritsar13Chandigarh11Indore7Nagpur6Pune5Panaji4Raipur4Jaipur4Kolkata2SC1Dehradun1Patna1Ahmedabad1

Key Topics

Section 142(1)8Section 2536Section 143(3)6Section 2505Section 1485Section 2635Depreciation4Section 148A3Section 12A3Cash Deposit

SHREE RAJENDRA SURI SAH SAKH SANTHA MYD,RAJGARH, DHAR vs. THE ITO, DHAR, DHAR

In the result appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 786/IND/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Indore09 Jul 2025AY 2015-16
Section 143(3)Section 246ASection 253Section 37Section 38(2)Section 80P

depreciation expenses of Rs.11,97,909/- claimed in the Profit and Loss account under section 38(2) of the Income-Tax Act, 1961 in view of leakage and personal utilization of vehicle without properly appreciating the facts of the case and submissions made before him\n\n6. That on the facts and in the circumstances of the case

SHREEPAL HUMAD,INDORE vs. THE PR CIT-1, INDORE

In the result, appeal of assessee is allowed

3
Addition to Income3
Disallowance2
ITA 125/IND/2021[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Indore21 Jun 2023AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyanishreepal Humad Pr. Cit-1 Near Civil Hospital, Bus Indore Vs. Stand Road, Manasa Madhya Pradesh (Appellant / Assessee) (Respondent/ Revenue) Pan: Aaxph1346 K Assessee By Shri Ashish Goyal & N.D. Patwa, Ars Revenue By Shri P.K. Mishra, Cit-Dr Date Of Hearing 13.04.2023 Date Of Pronouncement 21 .06.2023

Section 12ASection 138Section 263

246A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. 34. The Finance Minister in the parliament had introduced the “Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020. The respective petitioners opted to settle the dispute with Income Tax Department by filing declarations in Form 1 and 2 on 31.08.2020. 35. The Designated Authority namely, the third respondent has also issued Form

SCIENCE FORUM FOR RURAL DEVELOPMENT AND RESEARCH,GRAM MINDIA, SANVER ROAD vs. CIT(A), UJJAIN

ITA 340/IND/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Indore17 Mar 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Bhagirath Mal Biyani & Shri Paresh M Joshiassessment Year: 2017-18

Section 10Section 12ASection 142(1)Section 250Section 253

Depreciation 6,89,037/- Assessed Income 21,74,733/- 2.8 That in view of the aforesaid income of the assessee for the year under consideration is assessed at Rs.21,74,733/- U/s 144 r.w.s. 142(1) of the Act. 2.9 That the aforesaid order of Ld. A.O bears No.ITBA/AST/S/144/2019-70/1023240276(1) and is dated 27.12.2019 which is hereinafter referred

INCOME TAX OFFICER 2(1), BHOPAL, BHOPAL vs. PURUSHOTTAM GUPTA, BHOPAL

In the result appeal of the revenue is allowed and\n\"impugned order” is set aside

ITA 278/IND/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Indore08 Jul 2025AY 2016-17
Section 133(6)Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 250Section 253

depreciation), Net profit,\nN.P. margin. Reasons for short fall in Gross profit margin, if\nany may be explained with supporting evidences.\n3. Month-wise details of opening stocks, purchase, sale and\nclosing stock of different materials -indicate quantity and\nvalue wise.\n2.10 That however the assessee neither filed any written reply\nnor requested adjournment.\n2.11 That the assessee had mentioned

SHREE TEKCHANDJI MAHARAJ TRUST,UJJAIN vs. ASSESSING OFFICER, UJJAIN

ITA 537/IND/2025[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Indore30 Jan 2026AY 2016-17
Section 133(6)Section 139(1)Section 142(1)Section 144Section 147Section 148Section 148ASection 250Section 253Section 69A

depreciation claimed w.r.t. movable / immovable assets. Also specify\nwhether the capital expenditure on account of acquisition of these assets have been\nclaimed as application of income in the current year/previous years or not. If yes,\nsubmit justification for the same.\n12)\nDetails of the persons/ institutions to whom donation have been made during the\nyear in the format below:-\nName

ACIT-1(1), INDORE vs. KRITI NUTRIENTS LIMITED, INDORE

The appeal of the Revenue is allowed for statistical\npurposes

ITA 780/IND/2024[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Indore09 Jan 2026AY 2021-22
Section 246ASection 250Section 253

246A of the Act\nbefore the Ld. CIT(A) who by the “Impugned Order” has partly\nallowed the first appeal of the assessee on the grounds & reasons\nstated therein.\n2.3 That the revenue being aggrieved by the “Impugned Order”\nhas preferred the instant appeal before this Tribunal and has\nraised the following grounds of appeal in the prescribed form

DCIT-4(1), INDORE, INDORE vs. MARAL OVERSEAS LTD, KHARGONE

In the result, the “Impugned

ITA 569/IND/2025[1992-93]Status: DisposedITAT Indore27 Feb 2026AY 1992-93

Bench: Shri B.M. Biyani & Shri Paresh M Joshideputy Commissioner Of Maral Overseas Ltd. बनाम/ Income Tax- 4(1) Maral Srovar, V & Po, Vs. Indore Khalbujurg, Kasrawad, Khargone, Bhopal (Pan: Aaccm0230B) (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By Shri Satyajeet Goyal, Ca Revenue By Shri Ashish Porwal, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 03.02.2026 Date Of Pronouncement 27.02.2026

Section 143(3)Section 250Section 253

depreciation for the income tax return. b. In the revised return filed on 16.07.1993, the company though offered the said interest as income from other sources, however, it was claimed by way of a note appended to the return of income that the said income is not taxable and have been rightly deducted from pre-operative expenses c. The assessment