BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “depreciation”+ Section 1Oclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi22Mumbai7Chennai7Bangalore6Indore3Hyderabad2Ahmedabad2Karnataka1

Key Topics

Section 133A9Section 143(3)3Section 234A3Section 234B3Section 234C3Section 220(2)3Unexplained Investment3Addition to Income3Survey u/s 133A3

SHRI GOPAL KRISHNA SONI,MANDSAUR vs. ASSTT.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, RATLAM

In the result appeal of the assessee for Assessment Years 2000-01 is

ITA 713/IND/2017[2001-2002]Status: DisposedITAT Indore14 May 2019AY 2001-2002

Bench: Hon'Ble Kul Bharat & Hon'Ble Manish Borad

Section 133ASection 143(3)Section 220(2)Section 234ASection 234BSection 234C

1O,000/- are liable to be deleted. Relied on :- (1) A.C.I.T. vs. Raj Homes Pvt. Ltd. - 13 ITJ 658 p.p. 704 Ind. (2) A.C.I.T. vs. Shri Sharad Doshi - ITA no. 537/INDI 2015 dt. 23/12/16 Assessee has categorically stated at every stage that seized material does not belong to him. Revenue is not able to unearth any background with regard

Undisclosed Income3

SHRI GOPAL KRISHNA SONI,MANDSAUR vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCO ME-TAX , RATLAM

In the result appeal of the assessee for Assessment Years 2000-01 is

ITA 712/IND/2017[2000-01]Status: DisposedITAT Indore14 May 2019AY 2000-01

Bench: Hon'Ble Kul Bharat & Hon'Ble Manish Borad

Section 133ASection 143(3)Section 220(2)Section 234ASection 234BSection 234C

1O,000/- are liable to be deleted. Relied on :- (1) A.C.I.T. vs. Raj Homes Pvt. Ltd. - 13 ITJ 658 p.p. 704 Ind. (2) A.C.I.T. vs. Shri Sharad Doshi - ITA no. 537/INDI 2015 dt. 23/12/16 Assessee has categorically stated at every stage that seized material does not belong to him. Revenue is not able to unearth any background with regard

SHRI GOPAL SONI,MANDSAUR vs. ADDLL. CIT , RATLAM

In the result appeal of the assessee for Assessment Years 2000-01 is

ITA 714/IND/2017[02-03]Status: DisposedITAT Indore14 May 2019

Bench: Hon'Ble Kul Bharat & Hon'Ble Manish Borad

Section 133ASection 143(3)Section 220(2)Section 234ASection 234BSection 234C

1O,000/- are liable to be deleted. Relied on :- (1) A.C.I.T. vs. Raj Homes Pvt. Ltd. - 13 ITJ 658 p.p. 704 Ind. (2) A.C.I.T. vs. Shri Sharad Doshi - ITA no. 537/INDI 2015 dt. 23/12/16 Assessee has categorically stated at every stage that seized material does not belong to him. Revenue is not able to unearth any background with regard