D.K CONSTRUCTION,BHOPAL vs. THE ITO 2 (3), BHOPAL
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is treated as partly allowed for statistical purposes
ITA 23/IND/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Indore06 Sept 2024AY 2014-15
Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyanid. K Construction Ito 2(3) E 2/21, Pandit Deeendayal Bhopal Complex, Arera Colony, Vs. Bhopal (Appellant / Assessee) (Respondent/ Revenue) Pan: Aaafd7121P Assessee By Shri S.S. Deshpande, Ar Shri Ram Kumar Yadav, Cit- Dr Revenue By Date Of Hearing 04.09.2024 Date Of Pronouncement 09 .09.2024
Section 158A(1)Section 256Section 257Section 261Section 801B(10)Section 80I
depreciation. In view of absence of this material on record, it is apparent that the impugned order cannot be sustained. As the ITAT here chose to rely upon the order of Delhi
ITAT, it is clear that in view of the scheme of Section 158A, it would have been proper for it to wait till the question
