BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 80Dclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai4Hyderabad3Chennai3Jaipur3Bangalore2Visakhapatnam2Indore2Kolkata2Pune2

Key Topics

Section 80C3Section 143(2)2Section 142(1)2Deduction2

RAJESH PRAJAPATI ,UJJAIN vs. ACIT CIRCLE 2(1) , UJJAIN

Appeal is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 167/IND/2022[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Indore17 Jul 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyaniassessment Year:2013-14 Shri Rajesh Prajapati, A.C.I.T., बनाम/ 15, Naliya Bakhal, Circle 2(1), Ujjain Ujjain Vs. (Assessee / Appellant) (Revenue / Respondent) Pan: Alnpp5190Q Assessee By Ms.Sonam Khandelwal, Ar Revenue By Shri Ashish Porwal, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 25.05.2023 Date Of Pronouncement 17.07.2023

Section 143(3)Section 36(1)(iii)Section 80CSection 80DSection 80G

80D, Rs. 2,500/- u/s 80G. Page 1 of 12 Shri Rajesh Prajapati, Ujjain, Assessment year 2013-14 2. Heard the learned Representatives of both sides at length and case- records perused. 3. The Registry has informed that as per Form No. 36 filed by assessee- appellant, the impugned order dated 16.08.2017 was served upon assessee on 25.08.2017. Therefore, this

SHASHI PRABHA SINGHANIA,NEEMUCH vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER NEEMUCH, NEEMUCH

Appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 800/IND/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Indore05 May 2025AY 2018-19
Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 250Section 253Section 44ASection 80C

condonation of delay I.e. no cordial relationship\nwith youngest son whose e-mail Id and mobile number was on\nportal. The Ld. AR also stated that the “impugned order” is not\non merits despite the fact that law is clear on it. Per contra Ld.\nDR for revenue has not disputed the contentions canvassed