Search: condonation of delay

2 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 69Bclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai28 Surat21 Jaipur21 Chandigarh17 Chennai17 Delhi16 Ahmedabad16 Kolkata14 Cochin14 Rajkot12 Bangalore11 Hyderabad11 Pune8 Dehradun6 Visakhapatnam4 Guwahati3 Indore2 SC2 Amritsar2 Lucknow1 Jodhpur1

Key Topics

Section 115B7 Section 143(3)2 Section 143(2)2 Addition to Income2

LOVEKESH PATIL,BURHANPUR vs. CIT APPEALS, INDORE

Appeal is allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 316/IND/2023[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Indore29 Aug 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyaniassessment Year: 2015-16 Lovekesh Patil, Ito, House No. 204/1, Burhanpur बनाम/ Village - Turak Gurada, Vs. District – Burhanpur (Assessee/Appellant) (Revenue/Respondent) Pan: Dhnpp1752B Assessee By Assessee In Person Revenue By Shri K.Bala Murli Krishna, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 14.08.2024 Date Of Pronouncement 29.08.2024

Section 115BSection 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 68

section 68,69, 69A, 69B, 69C or 69D and assessee total income does not include any such income. 4. The addition of Rs. 2,40,920/- made by the AO on protective basis, which is not sustainable in the eyes of law, because in this case the AO himself stated in the assessment order that the assessee has explained cash

LOVEKESH PATIL,BURHANPUR vs. CIT APPEALS, INDORE

AGRAWAL DIAMONDS,BHOPAL vs. ACIT, CENTRAL-II, BHOPAL

LOVEKESH PATIL,BURHANPUR vs. CIT APPEALS, INDORE

AGRAWAL DIAMONDS,BHOPAL vs. ACIT, CENTRAL-II, BHOPAL