BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 272A(2)(c)clear

Sorted by relevance

Pune188Delhi154Chennai76Bangalore43Visakhapatnam37Mumbai36Cochin26Surat22Karnataka21Nagpur19Lucknow14Kolkata10Panaji10Ahmedabad9Cuttack8Hyderabad6Indore4Jaipur4Rajkot3Patna3Raipur3SC2Jodhpur1Amritsar1Guwahati1Varanasi1

Key Topics

Section 234E12Section 200A4Section 200(3)3TDS3Section 2532Section 2502Section 69A2Section 142(1)2Condonation of Delay

SUPREME TRANSPORT COMPANY,INDORE vs. ITO TDS-II, INDORE

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessees are allowed

ITA 914/IND/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Indore13 Oct 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri B.M. Biyani & Shri Paresh M. Joshi

Section 200(3)Section 200ASection 234E

272A(2), it can be said that a particular set up for imposition and the payment of fee under section 234E was provided but, it did not provide for making of demand of such fee under section 200A payable under section 234E. Hence, considering the aforesaid peculiar facts and circumstances, we are unable to accept the contention of the learned

SUPREME TRANSPORT COMPANY,INDORE vs. ITO TDS-II, INDORE

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessees are allowed

ITA 917/IND/2024[2013-14]Status: Disposed
2
ITAT Indore
13 Oct 2025
AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri B.M. Biyani & Shri Paresh M. Joshi

Section 200(3)Section 200ASection 234E

272A(2), it can be said that a particular set up for imposition and the payment of fee under section 234E was provided but, it did not provide for making of demand of such fee under section 200A payable under section 234E. Hence, considering the aforesaid peculiar facts and circumstances, we are unable to accept the contention of the learned

BMG CALCUTTAWALA JEWELLERS PVT. LTD.,INDORE vs. AO CPC (TDS), ITO TDS(1) INDORE, INDORE

Appeals are allowed\"

ITA 136/IND/2025[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Indore27 Nov 2025AY 2013-14
Section 200Section 200(3)Section 200A(1)Section 234ESection 246ASection 250Section 253

272A(2), it can be\nsaid that a particular set up for imposition and the payment of\nfee under section 234E was provided but, it did not provide for\nmaking of demand of such fee under section 200A payable under\nsection 234E. Hence, considering the aforesaid peculiar facts\nand circumstances, we are unable to accept the contention of\nthe learned

KAMLESH KOUSHAL,INDORE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, 1(2), INDORE

ITA 708/IND/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Indore06 Mar 2026AY 2017-18
Section 115Section 133(6)Section 142(1)Section 250Section 253Section 272A(1)(d)Section 274Section 69A

2). the assessee has failed to comply\nwith the notices u/s 142(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961\nissued and served upon the assessee during the course of\nE-scrutiny proceedings, thus penalty u/s 272A(1)(d) of the\nAct was initiated and show cause notice u/s 274\nr.w.s.272A(1)(d) of the I.T. Act, 1961 was issued