SUNITA GUPTA,INDORE vs. ACIT CIRCLE 2(1), INDORE

In the result, the appeal filed by the Assessee is allowed for statistical purpose

Bench: The Tribunal. The Assessee Has Filed A Notarized Affidavit Stating That Her Husband Shri Mahendra Gupta Was Looking After The Income Tax Proceedings. However, He Was Imprisonment Between February, 2019 To 22Nd October, 2021. Hence, He Could Not Appear Before Ld. Cit(A)-Nfac & Cooperate For The Hearing Of The Appeal.

section 144 r.w.s. 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter 2 I.TA No. 357/IND/2022 A.Y. 2010-11 Page No Sunita Gupta vs. ACIT referred to as ‘the Act’) relating to the Assessment Year (A.Y) 2010- 11. 2. The registry has noted that there is delay of 269 days in filing the appeal before the Tribunal. The assessee has filed

PRAMOD KUMAR SINGH,BHOPAL vs. ITO, WARD-3(1), BHOPAL

Appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

269 days in third appeal, therefore all three appeals are time-barred. Ld. AR for assessee submitted that the assessee has filed an application for condonation of delay supported by an affidavit on stamp, the same is scanned and re-produced below: Page 2 of 7 Shri Pramod Kumar Singh, Bhopal ITA Nos. 300 to 302/Ind/2023 AYs. 2007-08 Page

PRAMOD KUMAR SINGH,BHOPAL vs. ITO-WARD-3(1), BHOPAL

Appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

269 days in third appeal, therefore all three appeals are time-barred. Ld. AR for assessee submitted that the assessee has filed an application for condonation of delay supported by an affidavit on stamp, the same is scanned and re-produced below: Page 2 of 7 Shri Pramod Kumar Singh, Bhopal ITA Nos. 300 to 302/Ind/2023 AYs. 2007-08 Page

PRAMOD KUMAR SINGH,BHOPAL vs. ITO, WARD-3(1), BHOPAL

Appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

269 days in third appeal, therefore all three appeals are time-barred. Ld. AR for assessee submitted that the assessee has filed an application for condonation of delay supported by an affidavit on stamp, the same is scanned and re-produced below: Page 2 of 7 Shri Pramod Kumar Singh, Bhopal ITA Nos. 300 to 302/Ind/2023 AYs. 2007-08 Page

THE ACIT, CENTRAL-1, INDORE vs. M/S SURYA INFRA VENTURE PVT. LTD., INDORE

Bench: Ms. Madhumita Roy & Shri Bhagirath Mal Biyani

condoned. 5 Surya Infraventure ITA 216 of 2021 and others 5. Brief facts as culled out from the records are that the assessee is a private limited company engaged in the business of government works contract for construction of roads. The income-tax return of the assessee for the A.Y. 2010-11 was filed on 15.10.2010 declaring total income

THE AIT,ENTRAL-1, INDORE vs. SURYA INFRAVENTURE P LTD, INDORE

Bench: Ms. Madhumita Roy & Shri Bhagirath Mal Biyani

condoned. 5 Surya Infraventure ITA 216 of 2021 and others 5. Brief facts as culled out from the records are that the assessee is a private limited company engaged in the business of government works contract for construction of roads. The income-tax return of the assessee for the A.Y. 2010-11 was filed on 15.10.2010 declaring total income

THE ACIT, CIRCLE 2(1), INDORE vs. M/S SURYA INFRA VENTURE PVT. LTD., INDORE

Bench: Ms. Madhumita Roy & Shri Bhagirath Mal Biyani

condoned. 5 Surya Infraventure ITA 216 of 2021 and others 5. Brief facts as culled out from the records are that the assessee is a private limited company engaged in the business of government works contract for construction of roads. The income-tax return of the assessee for the A.Y. 2010-11 was filed on 15.10.2010 declaring total income