BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

7 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 260Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi337Calcutta206Mumbai116Karnataka64Amritsar36Kolkata35Chennai34Telangana25Hyderabad23Chandigarh13Lucknow12Andhra Pradesh10Bangalore9SC9Ahmedabad7Indore7Nagpur6Agra6Cochin6Jaipur5Surat5Rajasthan4Kerala4Orissa2Raipur2Himachal Pradesh2Punjab & Haryana2Dehradun2Jodhpur1Gauhati1Rajkot1Jabalpur1Varanasi1Pune1Cuttack1

Key Topics

Section 1325Section 153A5Addition to Income5Section 271(1)(c)4Section 43(1)4Section 271D4Section 253(5)4Section 269S4Penalty

VIMAL TODI,INDORE vs. ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, INDORE

Appeals are allowed

ITA 190/IND/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Indore25 Oct 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

Section 132Section 153ASection 253(5)Section 269SSection 271D

condone delay, admit appeal and proceed with hearing. 3.Since the issue for adjudication in these appeals is identical; they were heard together at the request of parties and are being disposed of by this consolidated order for the sake of convenience, brevity and clarity. 4. The background facts leading to these appeals are such that the asesesee was a director

VIMAL TODI,INDORE vs. ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, INDORE

Appeals are allowed

4
Section 143(3)3
Depreciation2
Disallowance2
ITA 189/IND/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Indore25 Oct 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

Section 132Section 153ASection 253(5)Section 269SSection 271D

condone delay, admit appeal and proceed with hearing. 3.Since the issue for adjudication in these appeals is identical; they were heard together at the request of parties and are being disposed of by this consolidated order for the sake of convenience, brevity and clarity. 4. The background facts leading to these appeals are such that the asesesee was a director

THE DCIT, 2(1), INDORE vs. SHRI OMPRAKASH DHANWANI, INDORE

ITA 440/IND/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Indore06 Nov 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153A

260A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 and the Income-tax Department has raised certain substantial questions of law. This Court has carefully gone through the order passed by the ITAT and the ITAT has given detailed fact finding in favour the assessee after scrutinizing the facts, the matter has been decided by the ITAT judiciously and the judgement

THE DCIT, 2(1), INDORE vs. SHRI OMPRAKASH DHANWANI, INDORE

ITA 439/IND/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Indore06 Nov 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153A

260A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 and the Income-tax Department has raised certain substantial questions of law. This Court has carefully gone through the order passed by the ITAT and the ITAT has given detailed fact finding in favour the assessee after scrutinizing the facts, the matter has been decided by the ITAT judiciously and the judgement

THE DCIT, 2(1), INDORE vs. SHRI OMPRAKASH DHANWANI, INDORE

ITA 339/IND/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Indore06 Nov 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153A

260A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 and the Income-tax Department has raised certain substantial questions of law. This Court has carefully gone through the order passed by the ITAT and the ITAT has given detailed fact finding in favour the assessee after scrutinizing the facts, the matter has been decided by the ITAT judiciously and the judgement

PRASAM RAKESH CHOUDHARY,GIRNAR SOCIETY, BAPURAO GALLI, ITWARI, NAGPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL -1, BHOPAL , BHOPAL

Appeal is dismissed

ITA 529/IND/2025[2018 -2019]Status: HeardITAT Indore22 Dec 2025

Bench: Ms. Suchitra R. Kamble & Shri B.M. Biyaniacit Circle-1(1) M/S. Rashtriya Takniki Bhopal Shikshak Prashikshan Evam Anunsandhan Sansthan बनाम/ Samiti, Vs. Bhopal (Revenue/Appellant) (Assessee/Respondent) Pan: Aabar2266H Assessee By Shri Ashish Porwal, Sr. Dr Revenue By Shri Vinod Joshi, Ar Date Of Hearing 08.12.2025 Date Of Pronouncement 22.12.2025

Section 10Section 271(1)(c)Section 43(1)

condoned taking into account the revenue’s solemn averments made in the affidavit to the effect that owning to engagements of AO and his subordinate staff in completing cases of assessments and re-assessments, there occurred delay. We follow the landmark judgement of Hon’ble Apex Court in Collector, Land Acquisition Vs Mst. Katiji and others

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-1(1), BHOPOAL, BHOPAL vs. M/S RASHTRIYA TAKNIKI SHIKSHAK PRASHIKSHAN EVAM ANUNSANDHAN SANSTHAN, BHOPAL

Appeal is dismissed

ITA 509/IND/2025[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Indore22 Dec 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Ms. Suchitra R. Kamble & Shri B.M. Biyaniacit Circle-1(1) M/S. Rashtriya Takniki Bhopal Shikshak Prashikshan Evam Anunsandhan Sansthan बनाम/ Samiti, Vs. Bhopal (Revenue/Appellant) (Assessee/Respondent) Pan: Aabar2266H Assessee By Shri Ashish Porwal, Sr. Dr Revenue By Shri Vinod Joshi, Ar Date Of Hearing 08.12.2025 Date Of Pronouncement 22.12.2025

Section 10Section 271(1)(c)Section 43(1)

condoned taking into account the revenue’s solemn averments made in the affidavit to the effect that owning to engagements of AO and his subordinate staff in completing cases of assessments and re-assessments, there occurred delay. We follow the landmark judgement of Hon’ble Apex Court in Collector, Land Acquisition Vs Mst. Katiji and others