BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

8 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 260clear

Sorted by relevance

Karnataka170Mumbai159Chennai99Delhi74Kolkata69Bangalore56Visakhapatnam40Calcutta38Pune36Jaipur32Cuttack29Raipur27Cochin24Ahmedabad23Chandigarh22Hyderabad21Varanasi13Panaji11SC10Telangana9Indore8Surat8Allahabad7Andhra Pradesh6Lucknow6Kerala4Amritsar4Rajkot4Patna3Nagpur3Guwahati3Punjab & Haryana2Agra2Orissa1A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1Rajasthan1

Key Topics

Section 142(1)8Section 153C7Section 2506Section 1444Section 2634Addition to Income4Condonation of Delay4Section 2533Limitation/Time-bar

M/S PLATINUM HORAZINE PVT. LTD.,INDORE vs. THE ACIT CIRCLE 3(1), INDORE

In the result, the appeal of the assessee stands

ITA 713/IND/2016[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Indore04 May 2017AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Chandra Mohan Garg & Shri O.P.Meenaआ.अ.सं./ I.T.A. No.713/Ind/2016 िनधा"रण वष" /Assessment Year: 2009-10

Section 249Section 253Section 271(1)Section 4Section 5

condone the delay of 106 days and admit the appeal and allow the appeal proceeded with for adjudication. 6. Now we shall deal with regular grounds of appeal of the assessee which reads as us under:- 1.That on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the learned CIT(A)-II Indore has erred in confirming penalty

MH BROTHERS ,RAISEN vs. THE ITO , RAISEN

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee for A

3
Section 249(2)2
Section 692
Depreciation2
ITA 370/IND/2022[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Indore18 Jul 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

Section 249(2)Section 250

condonation of delay. The ld. AR of the assessee has filed notice dated 31st May 2016 of Ld. CIT(A) whereby the assessee was asked to file the appeal electronically latest by 15.06.2016. Para 3 of the said notice reads as under: “3. However, only a paper appeal had het filed by you as mentioned above which

MH BROTHERS ,RAISEN vs. THE ITO , RAISEN

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee for A

ITA 371/IND/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Indore18 Jul 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

Section 249(2)Section 250

condonation of delay. The ld. AR of the assessee has filed notice dated 31st May 2016 of Ld. CIT(A) whereby the assessee was asked to file the appeal electronically latest by 15.06.2016. Para 3 of the said notice reads as under: “3. However, only a paper appeal had het filed by you as mentioned above which

SHRI NISHANT KUMAR TIWARI ,DEWAS vs. THE ITO -1 , DEWAS

In the result, assessee’s appeal is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 168/IND/2022[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Indore31 Jan 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: Ms. Madhumita Roy & Shri Bhagirath Mal Biyani

For Appellant: Shri Manjit Sachdeva, A.RFor Respondent: 25.01.2023
Section 144

Section 144 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred as to ‘the Act’) for Assessment Year 2011-12. 2. There is 260 days delay in preferring the appeal before us. An application for condonation

SMT SADHNA VOHRA,BHOPAL vs. ITO 1(3), BHOPAL

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is

ITA 735/IND/2018[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Indore18 Jul 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Kul Bharatassessment Year: 2010-11

Section 131Section 132Section 153CSection 69

delay of 7 days is condoned. Appeal is admitted for adjudication. 4. Ground No.1 is against legality of notice u/s 153C of the Act. Ld. Counsel for the assessee reiterated the submissions as made in the written submissions. It was submitted that the notice issued u/s 153C of the Act is invalid and void-ab-initio as there

KAILASH CHANDRA PATIDAR,SHAJAPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, SHAJAPUR

Appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical

ITA 196/IND/2025[2010-2011]Status: DisposedITAT Indore20 Nov 2025AY 2010-2011

Bench: Shri B.M. Biyani & Shri Paresh M Joshi

Section 142(1)Section 144Section 148Section 246ASection 249(3)Section 250Section 253

260/-. 2.2 The assessee for the Assessment Year 2010-11 corresponding to the Financial Year 2009-10 had not filed any income tax return. 2.3 That the department of Income Tax basis ITS-CIB-Data had an information that the assessee in the Financial Year 2009-10 had done business of about Rs.1,01,65,800/- at the multi commodity

KAILASH CHANDRA PATIDAR,SHAJAPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, SHAJAPUR

Appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical

ITA 216/IND/2025[2010-2011]Status: DisposedITAT Indore20 Nov 2025AY 2010-2011

Bench: Shri B.M. Biyani & Shri Paresh M Joshi

Section 142(1)Section 144Section 148Section 246ASection 249(3)Section 250Section 253

260/-. 2.2 The assessee for the Assessment Year 2010-11 corresponding to the Financial Year 2009-10 had not filed any income tax return. 2.3 That the department of Income Tax basis ITS-CIB-Data had an information that the assessee in the Financial Year 2009-10 had done business of about Rs.1,01,65,800/- at the multi commodity

SHAKUNTALA DAGA,UJJAIN vs. ITO 2(2) UJJAIN, UJJAIN

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 251/IND/2021[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Indore28 Jul 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Ms. Madhumita Roy & Shri Bhagirath Mal Biyani

For Appellant: Shri Manish Dafria, A.RFor Respondent: Shri P. K. Mitra, CIT D.R
Section 143(3)Section 194CSection 263

condone the delay in preferring the appeal before us by the assessee. 4. The brief facts leading to the case is this that the assessment under Section 143(3) of the Act was completed on 23.05.2017 upon assessing income of the assessee at Rs. 12,57,250/- as against the returned income