BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

6 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 260clear

Sorted by relevance

Karnataka170Mumbai163Chennai104Delhi75Kolkata74Bangalore57Calcutta38Jaipur30Cuttack29Pune28Raipur27Hyderabad21Chandigarh20Ahmedabad16Visakhapatnam14Varanasi13Cochin13Panaji11SC10Telangana9Surat9Lucknow6Indore6Andhra Pradesh6Rajkot5Allahabad5Kerala4Amritsar4Patna3Nagpur3Agra2Punjab & Haryana2Rajasthan1A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1Guwahati1Orissa1

Key Topics

Section 142(1)8Section 2506Section 1444Section 2634Addition to Income3Condonation of Delay3Section 249(2)2Section 2532Section 148

MH BROTHERS ,RAISEN vs. THE ITO , RAISEN

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee for A

ITA 370/IND/2022[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Indore18 Jul 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

Section 249(2)Section 250

condonation of delay. The ld. AR of the assessee has filed notice dated 31st May 2016 of Ld. CIT(A) whereby the assessee was asked to file the appeal electronically latest by 15.06.2016. Para 3 of the said notice reads as under: “3. However, only a paper appeal had het filed by you as mentioned above which

MH BROTHERS ,RAISEN vs. THE ITO , RAISEN

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee for A

ITA 371/IND/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Indore18 Jul 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

2
Section 246A2
Depreciation2
Disallowance2
Section 249(2)Section 250

condonation of delay. The ld. AR of the assessee has filed notice dated 31st May 2016 of Ld. CIT(A) whereby the assessee was asked to file the appeal electronically latest by 15.06.2016. Para 3 of the said notice reads as under: “3. However, only a paper appeal had het filed by you as mentioned above which

SHRI NISHANT KUMAR TIWARI ,DEWAS vs. THE ITO -1 , DEWAS

In the result, assessee’s appeal is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 168/IND/2022[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Indore31 Jan 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: Ms. Madhumita Roy & Shri Bhagirath Mal Biyani

For Appellant: Shri Manjit Sachdeva, A.RFor Respondent: 25.01.2023
Section 144

Section 144 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred as to ‘the Act’) for Assessment Year 2011-12. 2. There is 260 days delay in preferring the appeal before us. An application for condonation

KAILASH CHANDRA PATIDAR,SHAJAPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, SHAJAPUR

Appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical

ITA 196/IND/2025[2010-2011]Status: DisposedITAT Indore20 Nov 2025AY 2010-2011

Bench: Shri B.M. Biyani & Shri Paresh M Joshi

Section 142(1)Section 144Section 148Section 246ASection 249(3)Section 250Section 253

260/-. 2.2 The assessee for the Assessment Year 2010-11 corresponding to the Financial Year 2009-10 had not filed any income tax return. 2.3 That the department of Income Tax basis ITS-CIB-Data had an information that the assessee in the Financial Year 2009-10 had done business of about Rs.1,01,65,800/- at the multi commodity

KAILASH CHANDRA PATIDAR,SHAJAPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, SHAJAPUR

Appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical

ITA 216/IND/2025[2010-2011]Status: DisposedITAT Indore20 Nov 2025AY 2010-2011

Bench: Shri B.M. Biyani & Shri Paresh M Joshi

Section 142(1)Section 144Section 148Section 246ASection 249(3)Section 250Section 253

260/-. 2.2 The assessee for the Assessment Year 2010-11 corresponding to the Financial Year 2009-10 had not filed any income tax return. 2.3 That the department of Income Tax basis ITS-CIB-Data had an information that the assessee in the Financial Year 2009-10 had done business of about Rs.1,01,65,800/- at the multi commodity

SHAKUNTALA DAGA,UJJAIN vs. ITO 2(2) UJJAIN, UJJAIN

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 251/IND/2021[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Indore28 Jul 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Ms. Madhumita Roy & Shri Bhagirath Mal Biyani

For Appellant: Shri Manish Dafria, A.RFor Respondent: Shri P. K. Mitra, CIT D.R
Section 143(3)Section 194CSection 263

condone the delay in preferring the appeal before us by the assessee. 4. The brief facts leading to the case is this that the assessment under Section 143(3) of the Act was completed on 23.05.2017 upon assessing income of the assessee at Rs. 12,57,250/- as against the returned income