RAMCHANDRA MANGILAL SARATHE,KHANDWA vs. ITO-I KHANDWA, KHANDWA

In the result, the appeal of the assesse for A

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyaniramchandra Mangilal Ito-1 Sarathe Khandwa Gram Mathela Vs. Khandwa

condonation of delay in filing of appeal under section 254 of the Income Tax Act, before Hon'ble Income Tax Appellate

ANIL TURAKHIA,INDORE vs. ITO-5(1), INDORE, INDORE

Appeals are allowed for statistical purpose

254) -Delay 701 days\nMay it please your honours,\n1. The appellant submits that the order of the ld CIT(A) for A.Y. 2013-14 is dated\n09.06.2023. The appellant was required to file appeal by 08.08.2023. Further, the\nappeal could have been filed on 09.07.2025 resulting in delay of 701 days. The\nappeal could not be filed in time

ANIL TURAKHIA,INDORE vs. ITO-5(1), INDORE, INDORE

Appeals are allowed for statistical purpose

condoned the delay, admitted the appeals, and remanded the matters back to the CIT(A) for fresh adjudication.", "result": "Allowed", "sections": [ "253(5) of the Income-tax Act, 1961", "250(6) of the Income-tax Act, 1961", "143(3) r.w.s 254

MADHYA PRADESH POLICE HOUSING CORPORATION LIMITED,BHOPAL vs. DCIT-2(1), BHOPAL, BHOPAL

Appeal is allowed for statistical purpose

condoned the delay in filing the appeal after considering the submissions of the assessee and the revenue. The Tribunal then decided to remand the matter back to the CIT(A) for fresh adjudication on merits.", "result": "Partly Allowed", "sections": [ "143(3)", "254

M/S PHOENIX DEVCONS PVT. LTD.,INDORE vs. THE ACIT4 (1), INDORE

Bench: Ms. Suchitra R. Kamble & Shri B.M. Biyani(Conducted Through Virtual Court)

section 253(5) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, we hereby condone the delay in filing present appeals and proceed to adjudicate on merits. Facts in brief: 6. The assessee filed return of AY 2008-09 and AY 2009-10 at a total income of Rs. Nil and Rs. Nil respectively, which were originally assessed vide 1st assessment-order dated

M/S PHOENIX DEVCONS PVT. LTD.,INDORE vs. THE ACIT4 (1), INDORE

Bench: Ms. Suchitra R. Kamble & Shri B.M. Biyani(Conducted Through Virtual Court)

section 253(5) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, we hereby condone the delay in filing present appeals and proceed to adjudicate on merits. Facts in brief: 6. The assessee filed return of AY 2008-09 and AY 2009-10 at a total income of Rs. Nil and Rs. Nil respectively, which were originally assessed vide 1st assessment-order dated

M/S PHOENIX DEVCONS PVT. LTD.,INDORE vs. THE ACIT4 (1), INDORE

Bench: Ms. Suchitra R. Kamble & Shri B.M. Biyani(Conducted Through Virtual Court)

section 253(5) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, we hereby condone the delay in filing present appeals and proceed to adjudicate on merits. Facts in brief: 6. The assessee filed return of AY 2008-09 and AY 2009-10 at a total income of Rs. Nil and Rs. Nil respectively, which were originally assessed vide 1st assessment-order dated

ANDRITZ HYDRO P LTD,BHOPAL vs. PR CIT-1, BHOPAL

Bench: Shri Manish Borad & Ms. Madhumita Royvirtual Hearing

section 115JB of the Act. 7.Erred by not following the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of CIT vs Woodward Governor India Private Limited (312 ITR 254) in respect of allowability of foreign exchange losses. 8.Erred by blatantly disregarding the decision of the Hon'ble jurisdictional Indore Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal

RAMESH NANJUNDIAH DEVARYASAMUDRAM,JAIPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER 2(1), BHOPAL, BHOPAL

The appeal is hereby DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN

Bench: Shri B.M. Biyani & Shri Paresh M. Joshiassessment Year:2010-11 Ramesh Nanjundiah Ito 2(1) Devaryasamudram, Bhopal 101, Ground Floor, बनाम/ Plot No.7, Pooja Vihar, Vs. Sirsi Road Bishnawal, Jhotwara, S.O. Jaipur (Assessee/Appellant) (Revenue/Respondent) Pan: Adupd0388H Assessee By Shri Manoj Fadnis, Ar Revenue By Shri Ashish Porwal, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 22.09.2025 Date Of Pronouncement 26.09.2025

condonation of delay in filing the appeal It is respectfully submitted that there has been a delay of appeal .... days in filing the present For AY 2010-11, an order was passed under section 143(3) by ITO-2(1), Bhopal, on 21-03-2013. The order was appealed before the Ld. CIT(A), who passed an order

INCOME TAX OFFICER-1(2), INDORE, INDORE vs. DIVINE INFRACREATION AND TRADING PRIVATE LIMITED, MUMBAI

Accordingly quash the assessment-order made by AO.\nThe assessee's ground is allowed

254 of the\nAct by adjudicating the issue relating to the validity of reopening of\nassessment, when the CIT(A) had not decided the said issue on the merits of\nthe matter. It was vehemently contended that the CIT(A) erred in granting\nrelief to the assessee under section 80-1 of the Act on sum of Rs.9.89 crores\nignoring

NEEL KUMAR AJMERA ,INDORE vs. THE A.C.I.T 4 (1), INDORE

Appeal is allowed for statistical purpose

condoned the delay and remanded the matter back to the ITAT for fresh adjudication.", "held": "The Tribunal held that the CIT(A) order was not in conformity with Section 250(6) of the Income-tax Act and that the non-participation of the assessee was due to non-receipt of notices, as accepted by the High Court. Therefore, the appeal

T LOGIKS,INDORE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER 3 (1), INDORE

In the result, the impugned order is set aside as & by way of\nremand back to the file of the Ld

condoned the delay. The Tribunal found that the assessment order was passed ex parte and not on merits. Therefore, the Tribunal set aside the impugned order and remanded the case back to the AO for a fresh adjudication on merits.", "result": "Remanded", "sections": [ "253 of the Income Tax Act, 1961", "144 r.w.s. 254

DCIT-4(1), INDORE, INDORE vs. MARAL OVERSEAS LTD, KHARGONE

In the result, the “Impugned

Bench: Shri B.M. Biyani & Shri Paresh M Joshideputy Commissioner Of Maral Overseas Ltd. बनाम/ Income Tax- 4(1) Maral Srovar, V & Po, Vs. Indore Khalbujurg, Kasrawad, Khargone, Bhopal (Pan: Aaccm0230B) (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By Shri Satyajeet Goyal, Ca Revenue By Shri Ashish Porwal, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 03.02.2026 Date Of Pronouncement 27.02.2026

254 of the I.T. Act as well as the submissions of the appellant. T ITAT had Page 23 of 56 Maral Overseas Ltd. ITA No. 569/Ind/2025 - A.Y.1992-93 remanded the case for the limited purpose of verification as to whether fresh share capital was linked to the setting up of the project, and if so, the AO was directed to give

M/S BHOPAL DUGDH SANGH SAHAKARI MY.DAIRY PLANT, BHOPAL vs. DCIT -1 (1) ,BHOPAL, BHOPAL

In the result, the appeal of assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Mahavir Prasad & Shri B.M. Biyani

condoned the delay and proceeded for hearing of the appeal. 3. The assessee submitted return of income declaring a total income of Rs. 5,41,76,780/-. The Ld. AO selected case for scrutiny, issued statutory A.Y. 2012-13 Page 3 of 15 notices and finally completed assessment by passing order u/s 143(3) of the Act whereby the total

M/S CHOUHAN EDUCATION SOCIETY,BHOPAL vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION), BHOPAL

In the result, this appeal of assessee is allowed

Bench: Ms. Madhumita Roy & Shri B.M. Biyani

section 254 of Income-tax Act, 1961 [“the act”]. 2. The assessee is a society incorporated under M.P. Societies Registration Act, 1973 engaged in imparting education and vocational training. On 31.03.2000, the assessee filed application to Ld. CIT in Form No. 10A for grant of registration u/s 12AA of the Act whereupon the Ld. CIT called for certain details

ACIT-5(1), INDORE vs. S T I INDIA LTD., INDORE

Appeals are disposed of as under:

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

condoned and appeal is proceeded for hearing. 4. The grounds raised by parties are as under: Assessee’s ITA No. 11/Ind/2019 for AY 2012-13: Page 2 of 29 STI India Ltd. ITA Nos.11, 850, 12, 13/Ind/2019 & 22, 784, 23 & 24/Ind/2019 (A.Y.2012-13 to 2015-16) 1. That the Ld. CIT(A) erred in maintaining disallowance

ACIT-5(1), INDORE vs. S T I INDIA LTD., INDORE

Appeals are disposed of as under:

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

condoned and appeal is proceeded for hearing. 4. The grounds raised by parties are as under: Assessee’s ITA No. 11/Ind/2019 for AY 2012-13: Page 2 of 29 STI India Ltd. ITA Nos.11, 850, 12, 13/Ind/2019 & 22, 784, 23 & 24/Ind/2019 (A.Y.2012-13 to 2015-16) 1. That the Ld. CIT(A) erred in maintaining disallowance

ACIT-5(1), INDORE vs. S T I INDIA LTD., INDORE

Appeals are disposed of as under:

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

condoned and appeal is proceeded for hearing. 4. The grounds raised by parties are as under: Assessee’s ITA No. 11/Ind/2019 for AY 2012-13: Page 2 of 29 STI India Ltd. ITA Nos.11, 850, 12, 13/Ind/2019 & 22, 784, 23 & 24/Ind/2019 (A.Y.2012-13 to 2015-16) 1. That the Ld. CIT(A) erred in maintaining disallowance