BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 194Jclear

Sorted by relevance

Kolkata32Mumbai29Chennai24Delhi23Hyderabad5Bangalore4Patna4Lucknow3Visakhapatnam2Indore2Jaipur2Rajkot2Surat2Varanasi2Ahmedabad2Amritsar1Raipur1Karnataka1Jabalpur1Cochin1Chandigarh1

Key Topics

Section 201(1)10Section 2015Section 194J4Section 1392Section 194C2Deduction2TDS2Survey u/s 133A2

MAHATMA GANDHI STATE INSTITUTE OF RURAL DEVELOPEMENT,ADHARTAL vs. ACIT TDS, BHOPAL

Appeal is allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 820/IND/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Indore24 Jun 2025AY 2013-14
Section 139Section 194CSection 194JSection 201Section 201(1)

delay of 151 days due to unavoidable circumstances. The case concerns the incorrect application of Section 194J instead of Section 194C for TDS deduction, leading to a demand for tax and interest.", "held": "The Tribunal condoned

EXECUTIVE ENGINEER CONSTRUCTION DIVISION NO.2 ,BHOPAL vs. DCIT (TDS) , BHOPAL

Appeal is allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 348/IND/2023[2014-15]Status: Disposed
ITAT Indore
29 Mar 2024
AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyaniassessment Year: 2014-15 Executive Engineer, Dy. Cit (Tds), Construction, Bhopal Division No.2, बनाम/ E-5, Arera Colony, Vs. Bhopal (Appellant/Assessee) (Respondent/Revenue) Pan: Bplo 00510 G Assessee By Shri Manoj Fadnis, Ca & Ar Revenue By Shri Ashish Porwal, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 29.02.2024 Date Of Pronouncement 29.02.2024

Section 12ASection 139Section 194JSection 201Section 201(1)

section 194J of the Income- tax Act, 1961. 2. That on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law the Ld. AO erred in deeming the assessee as assessee in default u/s 201(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, as the payee society i.e. EPCO has correctly included the stated receipts in its income and filed valid