BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 160clear

Sorted by relevance

Chennai149Karnataka100Mumbai90Delhi75Chandigarh66Kolkata54Pune53Jaipur50Ahmedabad46Bangalore40Raipur27Rajkot26Surat22Nagpur19Panaji18Hyderabad17Lucknow10Patna10Visakhapatnam8Cuttack5Jabalpur4Indore4Jodhpur3SC3Ranchi2Calcutta1Rajasthan1Andhra Pradesh1Allahabad1Amritsar1Dehradun1Agra1

Key Topics

Section 80P11Section 80A5Condonation of Delay3Section 40A(3)2Section 139(1)2Section 2542Disallowance2Limitation/Time-bar2Addition to Income

M P RAJYA POWERLOOM BUNKAR SAHAKARI SANGH MARYADIT,BURHANPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, BURHANPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 523/IND/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Indore18 Jul 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyanimp Rajya Powerloom Bunkar Income Tax Officer Sakahari Sangh Maryadit Burhanpur Vs. Burhanpur (Appellant / Assessee) (Respondent/ Revenue) Pan: Aabam5938R Assessee By Shri Soumya Bumb, Ar Revenue By Shri Ashish Porwal, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 16.07.2024 Date Of Pronouncement 18.07.2024

Section 139(1)Section 80ASection 80P

160 to the total income of assessee. 4. On the facts and circumstances of the case and in law the learned CIT(A) erred in completing the assessment best of his judgment” 2. At the time of hearing the Ld. AR of the assesse has submitted that the assesse is Cooperative Society and filed its return of income belatedly

MUDIT KUMAR BAJAJ,UJJAIN vs. ITO-1(2), UJJAIN

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed”

2
ITA 550/IND/2023[2018-19]Status: HeardITAT Indore18 Jun 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani(Respondent/ Revenue) Pan: Aezpb2621P Assessee By Ms. Nupur Ladha & Shri Vaibhav Siroliya, Ars Revenue By Shri Ashish Porwal, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 13.06.2024 Date Of Pronouncement 18.06.2024 O R D E R

Section 143(1)(a)Section 154Section 40A(3)

delay of 14 days in filing the appeal is condoned. 4. The assessee has raised following grounds of appeals. “1. The ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) erred in confirming disallowance made by CPC,IT Department Bengaluru vide order passed u/s 154 without providing any opportunity to object the proposed rectification on account of cash payments to MPPKVVCL (a government

NEEL KUMAR AJMERA ,INDORE vs. THE A.C.I.T 4 (1), INDORE

Appeal is allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 234/IND/2024[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Indore22 Sept 2025AY 2008-09
Section 132Section 153ASection 254

160/-. Subsequently, a search u/s 132\nwas carried out and assessment u/s 153A was made upon assessee\nvide order dated 30.12.2011 at a total income of Rs.65,91,95,580/-.\nAggrieved by AO's order, the assessee carried matter in first-appeal.\nThereafter, both the revenue and assessee filed their respective\nappeals to ITAT, Indore bench registered

M/S BAGORA DEVELOPERS P LTD ,INDORE vs. THE AIT OSD , INDORE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 73/IND/2021[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Indore15 Feb 2024AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyanim/S. Bagora Developers Pvt. Acit- Ltd. Indore 34, Revenue Nagar Vs. Indore (Appellant / Assessee) (Respondent/ Revenue) Pan: Aaecb6424E Assessee By Shri Siddharth Mahajan & Ashok Mahajan, Ars Revenue By Shri Ashish Porwal, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 15.01.2024 Date Of Pronouncement 15.02.2024

Section 148Section 234ASection 234BSection 271(1)(c)Section 271F

condonation of delay and careful perused the relevant material on record. The impugned order was passed by the CIT(A) on 10.02.2020 and limitation for filing the appeal expired on 10.04.2020. Thus, the limitation for filing the appeal was expiring during the Covid-19 pandemic and therefore, the delay in filing the appeal is now covered by the judgment