BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 153Cclear

Sorted by relevance

Chennai352Delhi278Hyderabad117Mumbai101Bangalore91Pune77Ahmedabad74Jaipur60Kolkata44Visakhapatnam38Cochin33Amritsar28Surat26Chandigarh23Nagpur19Panaji15Karnataka13Lucknow9Dehradun6Guwahati6Raipur6Calcutta5Rajkot5Indore4Patna4Cuttack4Jodhpur3Telangana2SC1Ranchi1

Key Topics

Section 153C9Section 2637Section 1323Section 1473Section 69A3Addition to Income3Section 692Limitation/Time-bar2

SMT SADHNA VOHRA,BHOPAL vs. ITO 1(3), BHOPAL

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is

ITA 735/IND/2018[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Indore18 Jul 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Kul Bharatassessment Year: 2010-11

Section 131Section 132Section 153CSection 69

delay of 7 days is condoned. Appeal is admitted for adjudication. 4. Ground No.1 is against legality of notice u/s 153C of the Act. Ld. Counsel for the assessee reiterated the submissions as made in the written submissions. It was submitted that the notice issued u/s 153C of the Act is invalid and void-ab-initio as there

SHRI BHAWANI SHANKAR PARASHAR,INDORE vs. THE DCIT/ACIT 1 (2), INDORE

In the result, appeal of assessee is allowed

ITA 411/IND/2022[2012-13]Status: Disposed
ITAT Indore
21 Jun 2023
AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyanishri Bhawani Shankar Pr. Cit-1 Prashar Indore 28, Lasudia Mori, Vijay Vs. Nagar, Indore (Appellant / Assessee) (Respondent/ Revenue) Pan: Bgbpp 2475 G Assessee By Shri S.N. Agrawal, Ar Revenue By Shri P.K. Mishra, Cit-Dr Date Of Hearing 02.05.2023 Date Of Pronouncement 21.06.2023

Section 263

condoned the delay in filing the present appeal. The assessee has raised following grounds: “1. That on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld Pr. CIT erred in setting-aside the order as passed by the Assessing Officer under section 143(3) r.w.s. 147 of the Income-Tax Act, 1961 by invoking

ACIT(CENTRAL)-1, INDORE, INDORE vs. M/S GOYAL ROAD LINES, INDORE

In the result, appeal of the Revenue in ITANo

ITA 42/IND/2021[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Indore08 Mar 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Mahavir Prasad & Shri Manish Boradvirtual Hearing Assessment Year:2012-13 Acit Central-2, Goyal Road Lines Indore Indore बनाम/ (Appellant) (Respondent ) Vs. P.A. No.Aaefg2687F Revenue By Shri Amit Soni, Sr. Dr Assessee By Shri Ajay Tulsiyan & Miss Shalini Mehta, Ars Date Of Hearing: 03.01.2022 Date Of Pronouncement: 08.03.2022 आदेश / O R D E R

Section 132Section 139(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 153C

condone the delay in filing the revenue’s appeal and admit the same for hearing. 3. Brief facts of the case as culled out from the records are that the assessee is a partnership firm engaged in the business of transportation. Return for A.Y. 2012-13 filed u/s 139(1) of the Act on 30th September 2013 declaring income

DILIP BUDHADEV,INDORE, MADHYA PRADESH vs. THE ITO, SENDHWA, SENDHWA, MADHYA PRADESH

ITA 307/IND/2025[2013-14]Status: HeardITAT Indore16 Oct 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri B.M. Biyani & Shri Paresh M Joshi

Section 147Section 153CSection 246ASection 249(2)Section 249(3)Section 250Section 253Section 69A

153C of the Act and I not under section 147 of the Act since the document/information which formed the very basis for reopening the case of the appellant was found during the course of search carried out in the case of M/s Shri Renuka Mata Multi State Urban Cooperative Society Ltd on 26-05-2017 2. That on the facts