SUNIL KUMAR MOOLCHANDANI,BHOPAL vs. ITO,1(2), BHOPAL

Appeal is allowed for statistical purpose

153 days in\nfiling the appeal. There was no mala fide intention of the assessee for\nthus delay.\nThus, your honor in light of the above facts & circumstances of the case\nplease consider our humble submission to condone the delay in filling the\nsubject appeal and oblige.\nPlease do the needful and oblige\nThanking You,\nYours faithfully,\nShri Sunil Kumar

NARENDRA KUMAR MISHRA,BHOPAL vs. ITO-3(1), BHOPAL, BHOPAL

Appeal is partly allowed for statistical purpose

condone delay, admit\nappeal and proceed with hearing.\n4. The background facts leading to present appeal are as under:\n(i)\nThe assessee-individual is a differently-abled person. Originally, he\nwas a permanent employee of Central Govt. in the Department of\nTelecom for the period 01.12.1984 to 01.10.2000. Thereafter, w.e.f.\n01.10.2000, he was absorbed in BSNL, a public sector

ACIT(1), BHOPAL vs. SHRI ASHOK GOYAL, BHOPAL

Appeal are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav Hon'Ble & Shri Manish Borad

delay in filing of appeal are not condoned. All appeals are dismissed without admission. In the result, he 7 appeals are Dismissed. " Thereafter the appellant approached the Hon'ble ITAT, Indore against dismissal of seven appeals. Hon'ble ITAT, Indore bench. Indore decided the appeals on 30.04.2012 vide ITA No. 20- 2 for A.Ys

ACIT 1(1), BHOPAL vs. SHRI ASHOK GOYAL, BHOPAL

Appeal are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav Hon'Ble & Shri Manish Borad

delay in filing of appeal are not condoned. All appeals are dismissed without admission. In the result, he 7 appeals are Dismissed. " Thereafter the appellant approached the Hon'ble ITAT, Indore against dismissal of seven appeals. Hon'ble ITAT, Indore bench. Indore decided the appeals on 30.04.2012 vide ITA No. 20- 2 for A.Ys

ACIT1(1), BHOPAL vs. SHRI ASHOK GOYAL, BHOPAL

Appeal are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav Hon'Ble & Shri Manish Borad

delay in filing of appeal are not condoned. All appeals are dismissed without admission. In the result, he 7 appeals are Dismissed. " Thereafter the appellant approached the Hon'ble ITAT, Indore against dismissal of seven appeals. Hon'ble ITAT, Indore bench. Indore decided the appeals on 30.04.2012 vide ITA No. 20- 2 for A.Ys

THE ACIT 1 (1), BHOPAL vs. SHRI ASHOK GOYAL, BHOPAL

Appeal are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav Hon'Ble & Shri Manish Borad

delay in filing of appeal are not condoned. All appeals are dismissed without admission. In the result, he 7 appeals are Dismissed. " Thereafter the appellant approached the Hon'ble ITAT, Indore against dismissal of seven appeals. Hon'ble ITAT, Indore bench. Indore decided the appeals on 30.04.2012 vide ITA No. 20- 2 for A.Ys

ACIT 1( 1 ), BHOPAL vs. SHRI ASHOK GOYAL, BHOPAL

Appeal are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav Hon'Ble & Shri Manish Borad

delay in filing of appeal are not condoned. All appeals are dismissed without admission. In the result, he 7 appeals are Dismissed. " Thereafter the appellant approached the Hon'ble ITAT, Indore against dismissal of seven appeals. Hon'ble ITAT, Indore bench. Indore decided the appeals on 30.04.2012 vide ITA No. 20- 2 for A.Ys

THE ACIT 1(1), BHOPAL vs. SHRI ASHOK GOYAL, BHOPAL

Appeal are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav Hon'Ble & Shri Manish Borad

delay in filing of appeal are not condoned. All appeals are dismissed without admission. In the result, he 7 appeals are Dismissed. " Thereafter the appellant approached the Hon'ble ITAT, Indore against dismissal of seven appeals. Hon'ble ITAT, Indore bench. Indore decided the appeals on 30.04.2012 vide ITA No. 20- 2 for A.Ys

ACIT 1(1), BHOPAL vs. SHRI ASHOK GOYAL, BHOPAL

Appeal are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav Hon'Ble & Shri Manish Borad

delay in filing of appeal are not condoned. All appeals are dismissed without admission. In the result, he 7 appeals are Dismissed. " Thereafter the appellant approached the Hon'ble ITAT, Indore against dismissal of seven appeals. Hon'ble ITAT, Indore bench. Indore decided the appeals on 30.04.2012 vide ITA No. 20- 2 for A.Ys

THE ACIT, CIRCLE 2(1), INDORE vs. M/S SURYA INFRA VENTURE PVT. LTD., INDORE

Bench: Ms. Madhumita Roy & Shri Bhagirath Mal Biyani

condoned. 5 Surya Infraventure ITA 216 of 2021 and others 5. Brief facts as culled out from the records are that the assessee is a private limited company engaged in the business of government works contract for construction of roads. The income-tax return of the assessee for the A.Y. 2010-11 was filed on 15.10.2010 declaring total income

THE AIT,ENTRAL-1, INDORE vs. SURYA INFRAVENTURE P LTD, INDORE

Bench: Ms. Madhumita Roy & Shri Bhagirath Mal Biyani

condoned. 5 Surya Infraventure ITA 216 of 2021 and others 5. Brief facts as culled out from the records are that the assessee is a private limited company engaged in the business of government works contract for construction of roads. The income-tax return of the assessee for the A.Y. 2010-11 was filed on 15.10.2010 declaring total income

THE ACIT, CENTRAL-1, INDORE vs. M/S SURYA INFRA VENTURE PVT. LTD., INDORE

Bench: Ms. Madhumita Roy & Shri Bhagirath Mal Biyani

condoned. 5 Surya Infraventure ITA 216 of 2021 and others 5. Brief facts as culled out from the records are that the assessee is a private limited company engaged in the business of government works contract for construction of roads. The income-tax return of the assessee for the A.Y. 2010-11 was filed on 15.10.2010 declaring total income

ONEEL VERMA,NASHIK vs. ITO-5(1), BHOPAL

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal (Judicial Member), Shri B.M. Biyani (Accountant Member)

condone the delay of 65 days in filing the appeal and admit the appeal for adjudication in the interest of justice. On Merits: 4. The brief facts of the case are that the assessee is an individual, regularly assessed to tax at Nashik, and had filed his return of income for Assessment Year 2009–10. The assessment was completed

SUBODHCHAND SONI,SENDHWA vs. AO AU NFAC DELHI, DELHI

Appeal is allowed for statistical purposes

153 days from 'date of order' to the 'date of filing' as\nper the details furnished in Form No. 36, hence this appeal is time-barred.\nLd. AR for assessee submitted that the assessee has filed an application for\ncondonation of delay supported by affidavit on stamp. Referring to contents\nof same, Ld. AR submitted that the assessee

M/S J.C.SHARMA & SONS,BHOPAL vs. PR CIT -2, BHOPAL

In the result, this appeal of assessee is allowed

Bench: Ms. Madhumita Roy & Shri B.M. Biyaniassessment Year: 2015-16 M/S. J.C. Sharma & Sons Pr. Cit -2 बनाम Bhopal Bhopal (Appellant / Assessee) (Respondent/ Revenue) /Vs. Pan: Aaefj 6447 L Assessee By Shri Ashish Goyal & Shri N.D. Patwa, Ars Revenue By Ms. Simran Bhuller, Cit-Dr Date Of Hearing 29.09.2022 Date Of Pronouncement 14.11.2022 आदेश / O R D E R

condone the delay and proceed for hearing of appeal. 4. Briefly stated the facts are such that the assessee-firm is engaged in real-estate business. It filed return of income of the relevant AY 2015-16 on 27.09.2015 declaring a total income of Rs. 39,94,050/-. The case was selected for “Limited Scrutiny” and statutory notices were issued

VIMAL TODI,INDORE vs. ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, INDORE

Appeals are allowed

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

condone delay, admit appeal and proceed with hearing. 3.Since the issue for adjudication in these appeals is identical; they were heard together at the request of parties and are being disposed of by this consolidated order for the sake of convenience, brevity and clarity. 4. The background facts leading to these appeals are such that the asesesee was a director

VIMAL TODI,INDORE vs. ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, INDORE

Appeals are allowed

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

condone delay, admit appeal and proceed with hearing. 3.Since the issue for adjudication in these appeals is identical; they were heard together at the request of parties and are being disposed of by this consolidated order for the sake of convenience, brevity and clarity. 4. The background facts leading to these appeals are such that the asesesee was a director

AARAMBH FOUNDATION,INDORE vs. THE CIT EXEMPTION, BYHOPAL

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyaniaarambh Foundation Cit-(Exemption) 220 Saket Nagar Bhopal Saket Nagar Vs. Indore (Appellant / Assessee) (Respondent/ Revenue) Pan: Aabaa 0609F Assessee By Shri Kunal Agrawal Ar Revenue By Shri Ashish Porwal, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 12.12.2023 Date Of Pronouncement 04.01.2024

delay of 93 days in filing the appeal is condoned. The assessee has raised following grounds of appeal: “1. The Ld. CIT grossly erred in issuing order rejecting application for registration under section 12AB of the Act. 2. The Ld. CIT grossly erred on facts and also in law by considering charitable activities as commercial activities and rejecting application