BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 12A(1)(ba)clear

Sorted by relevance

Pune25Delhi22Kolkata8Ahmedabad5Mumbai5Indore4Jaipur3Chennai3Hyderabad3Nagpur2Bangalore2Cochin1Patna1Rajkot1Jodhpur1Visakhapatnam1Guwahati1

Key Topics

Section 1014Section 1112Section 139(1)9Section 139(4)7Section 1545Section 12A4Section 143(1)4Section 1394Exemption

HARDA NAGAR BAL VIKAS SAMITI HARDA ,SARSWATI SHISHU MANDIR vs. ITO-1, HARDA, BHOPAL

Appeal is allowed for statistical purposes in terms mentioned above

ITA 419/IND/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Indore06 May 2025AY 2017-18
Section 10Section 115BSection 139Section 139(1)Section 142(1)(i)Section 144Section 69ASection 80P

condoned the delay of filing of form 10B vide his order dated 06.08.2024. Therefore, in our considered opinion, on this issue there should not be any denial of exemption u/s 11 of the Act. However, with regards to delay in filing of ROI, section 12A(1)(ba

4
Deduction3
Rectification u/s 1542
Cash Deposit2

DEVI ANUSUIYA VIDYA SANSTHAN,INDORE vs. CIT(A), NFAC, DELHI

Appeal is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 472/IND/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Indore19 Feb 2026AY 2020-21
Section 10Section 11Section 12ASection 12A(2)Section 139(1)Section 139(4)Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 154

ba) in sub section 1 of section 12A\nof the IT Act which includes the IT return filed within the time allowed\nu/s. 139 of the Act. The contention of the assessee were dismissed by\nthe CIT(A) who was of the firm belief that return has been filed beyond\ndue date as mandated in section 139(1

SHRI GUPTNATH BAL SHIKSHAN SAMITI MACHALPUR,MACHALPUR vs. ITO WARD RAJGARH, RAJGARH

Appeal is allowed for statistical purposes in\nterms mentioned above

ITA 313/IND/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Indore30 Sept 2025AY 2017-18
Section 10Section 10ASection 131Section 139Section 139(1)Section 142(1)Section 144Section 270ASection 80A

condoned the delay of filing of form 10B vide his order dated\n06.08.2024. Therefore, in our considered opinion, on this issue there\nshould not be any denial of exemption u/s 11 of the Act. However,\nwith regards to delay in filing of ROI, section 12A(1)(ba

NANCY ANN MILLER EDUCATIONAL TRUST,INDORE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER-EXEMPTION, INDORE

Appeal is allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 29/IND/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Indore16 May 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyaniassessment Year : 2018-19 Nancy Ann Miller Income-Tax Officer, Educational Trust, Ward-(Exemption), बनाम/ 64/67, Dhar Kothi, Indore. Vs. Indore. (Assessee / Appellant) (Revenue / Respondent) Pan: Aaatn4010B Assessee By Shri S.S.Deshpande, Ca Revenue By Shri Ashish Porwal, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 08.05.2024 Date Of Pronouncement 16.05.2024

Section 11Section 12ASection 143Section 143(1)Section 154

condonation of delay before the CIT. 5.3 CPC is processing lakhs of return in an automated environment seamlessly. It is the duty of the appellant to file the return within due date and also to file necessary forms given in the Income Tax Rules as per the timelines prescribed in the statute. This was clearly mandated in Section 12A(ba