BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

14 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 120clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai176Chennai170Delhi128Karnataka123Kolkata97Chandigarh92Hyderabad64Bangalore61Pune60Jaipur52Raipur48Calcutta45Ahmedabad30Cuttack25Guwahati18Cochin18Rajkot18Surat16Indore14Lucknow14Amritsar12Patna11Visakhapatnam10Jodhpur7Nagpur7Panaji7SC6Varanasi6Telangana4Jabalpur3Dehradun2Orissa1Andhra Pradesh1Agra1Punjab & Haryana1Rajasthan1Himachal Pradesh1

Key Topics

Addition to Income8Section 12A7Condonation of Delay7Section 2636Section 69A5Section 1445Limitation/Time-bar5Disallowance5Section 234E

KAUSHALYA AGARWAL TRUST,INDORE vs. CPC BANGLORE, INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT, INDORE

In the result appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical\npurpose

ITA 890/IND/2024[2017-2018]Status: DisposedITAT Indore30 Jun 2025AY 2017-2018
Section 154Section 164Section 246ASection 253

condoned as\nsufficient cause is shown and appeal is admitted. It is\naccordingly taken up for hearing.\n3.2 The Ld. AR then brought to our notice that in the\n\"impugned order” the 1st appeal was dismissed only on ground\nof delay in the filing of the 1st appeal by 120 days. It was\ncontended that

HIRAMANI AJIT KUMAR JAIN,RATLAM vs. ITO-1, RATLAM, RATLAM

The appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 322/IND/2024[2011-2012]Status: Heard
4
Section 143(3)4
Section 1544
Section 1323
ITAT Indore
16 Oct 2024
AY 2011-2012

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyanishri Hiramani Ajit Kumar Jain, Income Tax Officer-1, 77, Tashakand Marg, Ratlam Vs. Ratlam (Appellant / Assessee) (Respondent/ Revenue) Pan: Agcph3330A Assessee By Shri Gagan Tiwari, Ar Revenue By Shri Ashish Porwal, Sr.Dr Date Of Hearing 16.10.2024 Date Of Pronouncement 16.10.2024 O R D E R

Section 271(1)Section 44ASection 69A

delay of 18 days in filing the appeal is condoned. 5. The assessee has raised following grounds of appeal: “1. That the order of the ADDL/JCIT(A) 2 Hyderabad is perverse, erroneous and is not tenable on facts and in law and also in breach of principle of natural justice. 1.1 That the action of the ADDL/JCIT(A) 2 Hyderabad

AARAMBH FOUNDATION,INDORE vs. THE CIT EXEMPTION, BYHOPAL

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 90/IND/2023[2021-2022]Status: DisposedITAT Indore04 Jan 2024AY 2021-2022

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyaniaarambh Foundation Cit-(Exemption) 220 Saket Nagar Bhopal Saket Nagar Vs. Indore (Appellant / Assessee) (Respondent/ Revenue) Pan: Aabaa 0609F Assessee By Shri Kunal Agrawal Ar Revenue By Shri Ashish Porwal, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 12.12.2023 Date Of Pronouncement 04.01.2024

Section 12A

delay of 93 days in filing the appeal is condoned. The assessee has raised following grounds of appeal: “1. The Ld. CIT grossly erred in issuing order rejecting application for registration under section 12AB of the Act. 2. The Ld. CIT grossly erred on facts and also in law by considering charitable activities as commercial activities and rejecting application

AMEY JAIN,INDORE vs. OFFICER, INDORE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 296/IND/2025[2019-2020]Status: DisposedITAT Indore27 Mar 2026AY 2019-2020

Bench: Shri B.M. Biyani & Shri Paresh M. Joshiassessment Year: 2019-20 Amey Jain, Ito 1(1), 127, Anurag Nagar Bh Indore Press Complex, बनाम/ Vijay Nagar, Vs. Indore (Assessee/Appellant) (Revenue/Respondent) Pan: Aqbpj1217D Assessee By Shri Harsh Choukse & Shri Kunal Agrawal, Ars Revenue By Shri Ashish Porwal, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 23.03.2026 Date Of Pronouncement 27.03.2026

Section 194Section 200ASection 201Section 234ESection 253(5)

section 253(5) and the decision of Hon’ble Supreme Court, we take a judicious view, condone delay, admit appeal and proceed with hearing. 4. Ld. AR for assessee explained following facts of case: (i) The assessee-individual is an NRI. (ii) On 09.05.2018, the assessee purchased a property for Rs. 53,43,000/- from R.R. Jain Infra (PAN: AAQFR9972C

M.P. STATE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD,BHOPAL vs. PR CIT-1, BHOPAL

ITA 158/IND/2020[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Indore08 Oct 2021AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Manish Borad & Ms. Madhumita Royvirtual Hearing Assessment Year: 2015-16

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 263Section 41(1)

condone the delay and admit the appeal for adjudication on merits. 3. Brief facts of the case as culled out from the records are that the assessee company is engaged in the Financial Assistance for industrial development and infrastructure. It declared total loss at Rs.1,55,62,351/- in the return filed on 30.09.2015. The case was selected for limited

SHABBIR LOHAR,ALIRAJPUR vs. THE ITO JHABUA, JHABUA

ITA 91/IND/2023[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Indore16 May 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyaniassessment Year: 2011-12

Section 142(1)Section 144Section 147Section 148

condone the delay of 110 days in filing of appeal. The appeal is admitted and proceeded for hearing. 4. Briefly stated the facts leading to present appeal are such that the Income-tax Department received an information that the assessee had deposited a cash of Rs. 11,50,000/- in account with State Bank of India during financial year

THE ACIT, CENTRAL-1, INDORE vs. M/S. MANISH AGRO TECH PVT. LTD., INDORE

In the result grounds of revenue for A

ITA 218/IND/2021[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Indore30 Jan 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Chandra Mohan Garg & Shri Bhagirath Mal Biyani

For Appellant: Shri Ruchira SinghalFor Respondent: Shri P.K Mishra, CIT (DR)

Condonation of Delay 2. The learned CIT-DR submitted that due to office procedure for filing appeal, the appeal against the order of learned CIT-3, Bhopal dated 27.08.2021; the appeal could be filed on 15.11.2021 with the delay of 8 days. The learned AR in all fairness, excepted that the delay of 8 days has been cause

THE ACIT, CENTRAL-1, INDORE vs. M/S. MANISH AGRO TECH PVT. LTD., INDORE

In the result grounds of revenue for A

ITA 219/IND/2021[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Indore30 Jan 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Chandra Mohan Garg & Shri Bhagirath Mal Biyani

For Appellant: Shri Ruchira SinghalFor Respondent: Shri P.K Mishra, CIT (DR)

Condonation of Delay 2. The learned CIT-DR submitted that due to office procedure for filing appeal, the appeal against the order of learned CIT-3, Bhopal dated 27.08.2021; the appeal could be filed on 15.11.2021 with the delay of 8 days. The learned AR in all fairness, excepted that the delay of 8 days has been cause

THE DCIT, 2(1), INDORE vs. SHRI OMPRAKASH DHANWANI, INDORE

ITA 440/IND/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Indore06 Nov 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153A

120 gms which comes to around 0.2% of the sales recorded. Similarly in the case of Vonamala Jagdishwaraiah; (2015) 44 CCH 005 GP at 0.1% has been accepted by Hyderabad Bench of ITAT and in the case of Mahandra Kumar Agrawal (2015) Tax Publication (DT) 2124 the Jaipur Bench of the Tribunal accepted the GP of 0.1%. Further

THE DCIT, 2(1), INDORE vs. SHRI OMPRAKASH DHANWANI, INDORE

ITA 339/IND/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Indore06 Nov 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153A

120 gms which comes to around 0.2% of the sales recorded. Similarly in the case of Vonamala Jagdishwaraiah; (2015) 44 CCH 005 GP at 0.1% has been accepted by Hyderabad Bench of ITAT and in the case of Mahandra Kumar Agrawal (2015) Tax Publication (DT) 2124 the Jaipur Bench of the Tribunal accepted the GP of 0.1%. Further

THE DCIT, 2(1), INDORE vs. SHRI OMPRAKASH DHANWANI, INDORE

ITA 439/IND/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Indore06 Nov 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153A

120 gms which comes to around 0.2% of the sales recorded. Similarly in the case of Vonamala Jagdishwaraiah; (2015) 44 CCH 005 GP at 0.1% has been accepted by Hyderabad Bench of ITAT and in the case of Mahandra Kumar Agrawal (2015) Tax Publication (DT) 2124 the Jaipur Bench of the Tribunal accepted the GP of 0.1%. Further

DCIT,CENTRAL-1, INDORE vs. SHRI RAKESH KUMAR AGRAWAL, MHOW

ITA 65/IND/2021[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Indore11 Mar 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Mahavir Prasad & Shri Manish Boradvirtual Hearing

Section 143Section 144

delay in filing the appeals is condoned in view of Covid-19 restrictions. As submitted by the Ld. Counsel for the assessee and as also concurred with by the Ld. Departmental Representative that the issues raised in all these appeals are common and inter-linked and as also, are arising out of the similar facts, for the sake of convenience

DCIT,CENTRAL-1, INDORE vs. SHRI RAKESH KUMAR AGRAWAL, MHOW

ITA 64/IND/2021[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Indore11 Mar 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Mahavir Prasad & Shri Manish Boradvirtual Hearing

Section 143Section 144

delay in filing the appeals is condoned in view of Covid-19 restrictions. As submitted by the Ld. Counsel for the assessee and as also concurred with by the Ld. Departmental Representative that the issues raised in all these appeals are common and inter-linked and as also, are arising out of the similar facts, for the sake of convenience

DCIT,CENTRAL-1, INDORE vs. SHRI RAKESH KUMAR AGRAWAL, MHOW

ITA 66/IND/2021[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Indore11 Mar 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Mahavir Prasad & Shri Manish Boradvirtual Hearing

Section 143Section 144

delay in filing the appeals is condoned in view of Covid-19 restrictions. As submitted by the Ld. Counsel for the assessee and as also concurred with by the Ld. Departmental Representative that the issues raised in all these appeals are common and inter-linked and as also, are arising out of the similar facts, for the sake of convenience