BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 117clear

Sorted by relevance

Chennai158Karnataka124Delhi122Mumbai121Pune85Kolkata58Bangalore46Raipur44Calcutta35Jaipur35Ahmedabad33Chandigarh30Panaji30Hyderabad29Lucknow12Surat10Visakhapatnam8Telangana8Cuttack7SC7Allahabad6Varanasi6Jodhpur5Guwahati5Nagpur5Rajasthan4Amritsar4Indore3Rajkot3Orissa2Cochin2Andhra Pradesh1Agra1

Key Topics

Section 234E10Section 200A4Section 143(2)4TDS3Section 200(3)2Condonation of Delay2

M/S. M. LODHA IMPEX,RATLAM vs. THE ITO-1, RATLAM

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 185/IND/2016[2000-01]Status: DisposedITAT Indore27 Jun 2018AY 2000-01

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Manish Boradआ.अ.सं /.I.T.A. No. 185/Ind/2016 "नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2000-01 M/S.M.Lodha Impex, Vs. Income-Tax Officer, 117-118, Manak Chowk, Ward 1, Ratlam. Ratlam.

For Appellant: Shri Satiksh Solanki, DRFor Respondent: 29.05.2018
Section 119(1)(b)Section 119(2)(b)Section 142Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 154Section 234A

117-118, Manak Chowk, Ward 1, Ratlam. Ratlam. अपीलाथ" /Appellant ""यथ" /Respondent "था.ले.सं./PAN: AAQFM1917J : Shri Rajesh Mehta, C. A. अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/Appellant by : Shri Satiksh Solanki, DR ""यथ" क" ओर से/Respondent by : 29.05.2018. सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date of hearing : 27.06.2018 उ"ोषणा क" तारीख/Date of pronouncement -: 2 :- M.LODHA IMPEX,RATLAM. आदेश

SUPREME TRANSPORT COMPANY,INDORE vs. ITO TDS-II, INDORE

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessees are allowed

ITA 917/IND/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Indore13 Oct 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri B.M. Biyani & Shri Paresh M. Joshi

Section 200(3)Section 200ASection 234E

condonation of delay and the appeal prior to amendments also did not make the imposition of late fees by Section 234 E to be ultra vires." 14. The findings of Hon'ble Rajasthan High Court has also escaped the consideration by Hon'ble ITAT. She accordingly requested that the same may kindly be considered to avoid any miscarriage of justice

SUPREME TRANSPORT COMPANY,INDORE vs. ITO TDS-II, INDORE

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessees are allowed

ITA 914/IND/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Indore13 Oct 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri B.M. Biyani & Shri Paresh M. Joshi

Section 200(3)Section 200ASection 234E

condonation of delay and the appeal prior to amendments also did not make the imposition of late fees by Section 234 E to be ultra vires." 14. The findings of Hon'ble Rajasthan High Court has also escaped the consideration by Hon'ble ITAT. She accordingly requested that the same may kindly be considered to avoid any miscarriage of justice