Search: condonation of delay

4 results for “condonation of delay”+ Permanent Establishmentclear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 1478 Section 1443 Penalty3 Condonation of Delay3 Section 2532 Section 2502 Section 1482 Section 142(1)2 Section 246A

MALA DHIRENDRA SINGH,BHOPAL vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1(4), INDORE

In the result the “Impugned order” is set aside as and by

ITA 790/IND/2025[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Indore17 Apr 2026AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri B.M. Biyani & Shri Paresh M Joshi

Section 142(1)Section 144Section 147Section 148Section 246ASection 250Section 253Section 271(1)(c)

establish the correctness of claims as made on the issue of unexplained Page 11 of 25 MALA DHIRENDRA SINGH ITA No. 790&791/Ind/2025 - A.Y.2014-15 investment/transactions as contended as already reasoned and analysed as discussed in detail supra as pertains to assessment appeal. As appellant failed to substantiate such share transactions/investments with supporting proofs/sources, the entire transactions are treated as unexplained

MALA DHIRENDRA SINGH,BHOPAL vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1(4), INDORE

MALA DHIRENDRA SINGH,BHOPAL vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1(4), INDORE

MALA DHIRENDRA SINGH,BHOPAL vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 1(4), INDORE

ACIT 2 (1), INDORE vs. M/S JILA INDUSTRIES LTD, DHAR

JILA SAHAKARI KENDRIYA BANK MARYADIT,KHARGONE vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER NATIONAL FACELESS ASSESSMENT CENTRE, DELHI