BABITA CHELAWAT,INDORE vs. DCIT/ACIT 1(1), INDORE, INDORE

The appeal of the assessee is allowed & the impugned order is set aside

Bench: Shri B.M. Biyani & Shri Paresh M Joshi

penny stock transactions and SLP was also dismissed by Hon'ble Supreme Court in the above matter. Hence, the ground of appeal is without any merit and hence the same is dismissed. 8.6 Vide Ground No. 8, the appellant has submitted that Ld. AO erred by not serving the order for rectification request made by the assessee for mistake apparent

INCOME TAX OFFICER INDORE 5(1), INDORE vs. UMANG DEVELOPERS, INDORE

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Shri B.M. Biyaniito-5(1) Indore

condone delay, admit these appeals and proceed with hearing. 3. The background facts leading to present appeals are such that the assessee is a partnership firm engaged in the business of real estate. For AY 2017-18 & 2018-19, the assessee filed its returns/revised returns of income u/s 139 declaring total incomes of Rs. Nil (with current year loss

SUNITA GUPTA,INDORE vs. ACIT CIRCLE 2(1), INDORE

In the result, the appeal filed by the Assessee is allowed for statistical purpose

Bench: The Tribunal. The Assessee Has Filed A Notarized Affidavit Stating That Her Husband Shri Mahendra Gupta Was Looking After The Income Tax Proceedings. However, He Was Imprisonment Between February, 2019 To 22Nd October, 2021. Hence, He Could Not Appear Before Ld. Cit(A)-Nfac & Cooperate For The Hearing Of The Appeal.

condone the delay of 269 days in filing the appeal before the Tribunal. 3. The brief facts of the case is that the assesse is an individual who filed her Return of Income for the Assessment Year 2010-11 on 14.03.2011 declaring total income of Rs. 7,89,970/-. Thereafter 3 I.TA No. 357/IND/2022 A.Y. 2010-11 Page No Sunita