M/S SHREE JAIRAM EDUCATION SOCIETY,BHOPAL vs. PR. CIT (CENTRAL), BHOPAL

In the result, appeal of the assessee in ITANo

Bench: Hon’Ble Rajpal Yadav & Shri Manish Boradvirtual Hearing

investment is made for construction of buildings for housing the college, hostel and to provide other facilities to the students who are studying in the College. The College is recognized by the Medical Council of India, State of Karnataka and all other statutory authorities. Therefore, it cannot be said that the Trust is not genuine. Admittedly, the students are being

M/S TRUBA EDUCATION SOCIETY ,BHOPAL vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL) BHOPAL, BHOPAL

Trust Vs. CIT,\nExemption (2024) 168 taxmann.com 90 (Jaipur – Trib.), order dated\n03.06.2024\n(iii)\nITA Delhi in ITA No. 1803/Del/2024 Lakhmi Chand Charitable\nSociety, New Delhi Vs. Principal Commissioner of Income-tax, New\nDelhi, (2024) 166 taxmann.com 324 (Delhi Trib.), order dated\n22.08.2024.\n13.\nLd. AR submitted that the facts of the case and legal precedents noted\nabove would

SHRI MAHESHWARI JANKAIYAN TRUST ,INDORE vs. THE CIT EXEMPTION, BHOPAL

In the result, the appeal filed by the Assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar (Judicial Member), Shri B.M. Biyani (Accountant Member)

unexplained. These details were not verified by the Assessing Officer while passing the assessment order. Therefore the said assessment order is an erroneous order and prejudicial to the interest of Revenue. Hence a show cause notice was served upon the assessee why the assessment order be revised u/s. 263 of the Act to bring to tax the differential income

M/S AD-MANUM FINANCE LTD.,INDORE vs. THEDCIT 1(1) , INDORE, INDORE

Bench: Hon’Ble Kul Bharat & Hon’Ble Manish Boradassessment Year 2010-11

Charitable Trust and Available Finance Ltd. sources of which was not explained. Based on above allegations, statutory notices u/s 148, 143(2) and 142(1) of the IT Act, 1961 were issued to the assessee company. In response to the notices as issued above, the assessee company made compliances from time to time. Considering the replies of the assessee

THE DCIT1(1), INDORE vs. M/S. AVILABLE FINANCE LTD., INDORE

Bench: Hon’Ble Kul Bharat & Hon’Ble Manish Boradassessment Year 2010-11

Charitable Trust and Available Finance Ltd. sources of which was not explained. Based on above allegations, statutory notices u/s 148, 143(2) and 142(1) of the IT Act, 1961 were issued to the assessee company. In response to the notices as issued above, the assessee company made compliances from time to time. Considering the replies of the assessee

DY. CIT -1(1), INDORE vs. M/S. AGRAWAL TRANSPORT CORPORATION (P) LTD., INDORE

Bench: Hon’Ble Kul Bharat & Hon’Ble Manish Boradassessment Year 2010-11

Charitable Trust and Available Finance Ltd. sources of which was not explained. Based on above allegations, statutory notices u/s 148, 143(2) and 142(1) of the IT Act, 1961 were issued to the assessee company. In response to the notices as issued above, the assessee company made compliances from time to time. Considering the replies of the assessee

SHREE TEKCHANDJI MAHARAJ TRUST,UJJAIN vs. ASSESSING OFFICER, UJJAIN

investments made in movable assets/fixed assets and immovable\nproperties.\nDetails of Accumulation made U/s.11(2), if any, in last 8 years and the details of\nutilization as below:-\nA.Y.\nAmount\nAccumulated\nAmount\nUtilized\nPurpose of\nAmount\nPurpose of\nUtilization\nBalance\nAmount\nUnutilized\nof Amount\nend of\nYr.\ntill\nAssessment\nAlso furnish copies of Application in Form 10 & Resolution of Trustees