M/S SHREE JAIRAM EDUCATION SOCIETY,BHOPAL vs. ACIT CENTRAL-II, BHOPAL

In the result, appeal of the assessee in ITANo

Bench: Hon’Ble Rajpal Yadav & Shri Manish Boradvirtual Hearing

trust amongst other hospitals and colleges which are undisputedly providing charitable services in the field of medical and education. (iii) The issue of irregularity in admission process is not part of the show cause notice dated 6.12.2018 issued to the assessee in connection with the cancellation of registration u/s 12AA(3) of the Act which shows that assessee

M/S SHREE JAIRAM EDUCATION SOCIETY,BHOPAL vs. PR. CIT (CENTRAL), BHOPAL

In the result, appeal of the assessee in ITANo

Bench: Hon’Ble Rajpal Yadav & Shri Manish Boradvirtual Hearing

trust amongst other hospitals and colleges which are undisputedly providing charitable services in the field of medical and education. (iii) The issue of irregularity in admission process is not part of the show cause notice dated 6.12.2018 issued to the assessee in connection with the cancellation of registration u/s 12AA(3) of the Act which shows that assessee

M/S. ARIHANT CHERITABLE TRUST,INDORE vs. THE ITO (TDS)-1, INDORE

In the result, we find no force in the ground of the Revenue, hence dismissed

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Manish Boradassessment Year:2015-16

Charitable Trust Indore /ITANo.909/2019 1.7.1] The second observation of the assessing officer was that these services were technical services as per Explanation 2 to clause (vii) of sub- section (1) of section 9 of the Income-Tax Act, 1961. 1.7.2] It is pertinent to note that Explanation 2 to clause (vii) of sub-section (1) of section

BISA NEEMA PANCHAYAT BHAWAN TRUST,M.G ROAD vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION) BHOPAL, COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(EXEMPTION) BHOPAL

Appeal is allowed for statistical purpose

Bench: Shri B.M. Biyani & Shri Dinesh Mohan Sinhaa.Y. : 2023-24 Bisa Neema Panchayat Commissioner Of Income- Bhawan Trust, Tax (Exemption), बनाम/ 285, M.G. Road, Bhopal Vs. Indore (Assessee/Appellant) (Revenue/Respondent) Pan: Aactb4287E Assessee By Shri S.S.Deshpande, C.A. & Ar Revenue By Shri V.K. Singh, Cit-Dr Date Of Hearing 27.11.2024 Date Of Pronouncement 29.11.2024

43. Thus, the second issue which arises for our consideration and decision is, whether the respondent-trust is a charitable and religious trust only for the purposes of a particular community and therefore, not eligible for exemption under Section 11 of the Act in view of provisions of Section 13(1

M/S SHISHUKUNJ EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY,THE SHISHUKUNJ INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL, GRAM JHALARIA vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL), DIRECTOR GENERAL OF INCOME TAX. AAYKAR BHAWAN,

1.—For the purposes of this\nproviso, "specified date" shall mean the day\non which the period of six months,\ncalculated from the end of the quarter in\nwhich the first notice is issued by the\nPrincipal Commissioner or Commissioner,\non or after the 1st day of April, 2022,\ncalling for any document or information, or\nfor making any inquiry

THE DCIT, (EXEMPTION) CIRCLE, BHOPAL vs. M/S. MAYANK WELFARE SOCIETY, BHOPAL

In the result, Revenue’s appeal for the AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Manish Borad & Ms. Madhumita Royvirtual Hearing Assessment Year: 2013-14

trust based on religious tenets - Activities of trust both charitable and religious - benefits not exclusively meant for particular religious community - trust not disqualified to claim exemption - Income-tax Act, 1961." 6.Income tax Officer vs. Gaudiua Granth Anuved Trust (2014) 23 ITJ 141 (Trib.-Agra) ITAT, Agra Bench "Income – U/s 2(24) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 - corpus Donation - Whether

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION) CIRCLE BHOPAL, BHOPAL vs. MAYANK WELFARE SOCIETY, INDORE

In the result, Revenue’s appeal for the AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Manish Borad & Ms. Madhumita Royvirtual Hearing Assessment Year: 2013-14

trust based on religious tenets - Activities of trust both charitable and religious - benefits not exclusively meant for particular religious community - trust not disqualified to claim exemption - Income-tax Act, 1961." 6.Income tax Officer vs. Gaudiua Granth Anuved Trust (2014) 23 ITJ 141 (Trib.-Agra) ITAT, Agra Bench "Income – U/s 2(24) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 - corpus Donation - Whether

DAWAT E ISLAMI,RAIPUR vs. THE CIT ( EXEMPTION ) BHOPAL, BHOPAL

In the result, the appeal filed by the assesse is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyanidawat E Islami Chhttisgarh Cit(Exemption) Sanjay Nagar R D A Plot Raipur Bhopal Vs. Raipur, Chhttisgarh (Appellant / Assessee) (Revenue) Pan: Aadtd 7213 R Assessee By Shri Ankit Chowksi, Ar Revenue By Shri P.K. Mishra, Cit-Dr Date Of Hearing 01.08.2023 Date Of Pronouncement 22.09.2023

43 Taxmann.com 243 (SC). Thus, Ld. AR has submitted that the Hon’ble Supreme Court has held that religious trust is entitled for exemption u/s 11 & 12 of the Act which are substantive provisions provided for exemption available to a religious or charitable trust. Therefore, income derived from property held by such public trust as well as voluntary contributions received

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-1(1), BHOPOAL, BHOPAL vs. M/S RASHTRIYA TAKNIKI SHIKSHAK PRASHIKSHAN EVAM ANUNSANDHAN SANSTHAN, BHOPAL

Appeal is dismissed

Bench: Ms. Suchitra R. Kamble & Shri B.M. Biyaniacit Circle-1(1) M/S. Rashtriya Takniki Bhopal Shikshak Prashikshan Evam Anunsandhan Sansthan बनाम/ Samiti, Vs. Bhopal (Revenue/Appellant) (Assessee/Respondent) Pan: Aabar2266H Assessee By Shri Ashish Porwal, Sr. Dr Revenue By Shri Vinod Joshi, Ar Date Of Hearing 08.12.2025 Date Of Pronouncement 22.12.2025

1)(c) of the Income tax Act. 1961” 5. Now, we re-produce the order of first-appeal passed by Ld. CIT(A) deleting the penalty: “7. Decision :- 7.1 The appellant is a charitable trust registered under section 12A of the Income Tax Act (the Act). The income of the appellant is exempt

PRASAM RAKESH CHOUDHARY,GIRNAR SOCIETY, BAPURAO GALLI, ITWARI, NAGPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL -1, BHOPAL , BHOPAL

Appeal is dismissed

Bench: Ms. Suchitra R. Kamble & Shri B.M. Biyaniacit Circle-1(1) M/S. Rashtriya Takniki Bhopal Shikshak Prashikshan Evam Anunsandhan Sansthan बनाम/ Samiti, Vs. Bhopal (Revenue/Appellant) (Assessee/Respondent) Pan: Aabar2266H Assessee By Shri Ashish Porwal, Sr. Dr Revenue By Shri Vinod Joshi, Ar Date Of Hearing 08.12.2025 Date Of Pronouncement 22.12.2025

1)(c) of the Income tax Act. 1961” 5. Now, we re-produce the order of first-appeal passed by Ld. CIT(A) deleting the penalty: “7. Decision :- 7.1 The appellant is a charitable trust registered under section 12A of the Income Tax Act (the Act). The income of the appellant is exempt

SHREE SHANTANU VIDHYAPEETH SOCIETY ,INDORE, M.P. vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, NFAC, DELHI, DELHI

Appeal is allowed for statistical purpose

charitable institutions and\ninstitutions engaged in public activity but there are certain conditions for that.\nA trust has to file its return of income, get its accounts audited, apply for\nregistration under section 12A. CBDT circular is of no help when a trust is\ndoing genuine work but it does not register it as a society, does not maintain\nproper

SARSWATI VIDHYA PRATISHTHAN M.P ,BHUPAL vs. THE ACIT 2(1), BHOPAL

In the result, appeal of assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyanisarswati Vidhya Pratishthan Dcit (E) M.P. Bhopal Vs. 01, Harshwardhan Nagar Bhopal (Appellant / Assessee) (Respondent/ Revenue) Pan: Aadas0899M Assessee By Shri Santosh Deshmukh & Shri Parth Jhawar, Ars Revenue By Shri Ashish Porwal, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 23.08.2023 Date Of Pronouncement 30.08.2023

1(SC) : TC23R.195 followed. The majority decision in Surat Art Silk Manufacturers case has the effect of neutralising the radical changes brought about by Parliament in the system of taxation of income and profits of charities, with particular reference to "objects of general public utility" to prevent tax evasion, by diversion of business profits to charities. It is the vagueness

M/S. DEVI SHAKUNTALA THKARAL CHARITABLE FOUNDATION,BHOPAL vs. PR CIT ,CENTRAL, BHOPAL

In the result, this appeal of assessee is allowed

Bench: Ms. Madhumita Roy & Shri B.M. Biyani(Conducted Through Virtual Court)

43 of 1961) and in supersession of the notification of the Government of India, Central Board of Direct Taxes number S.O. 880(E), dated the 14th September,2001, published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part II, Section 3, Sub section (ii), dated the 14th September, 2001, except as respects things done or omitted to be done before such supersession

M/S. BARKATUIIAH VISHWAVIDYALAYA ,BHOPAL vs. DCIT (EXEMPTION), BHOPAL

In the result, this appeal of assessee is allowed for statistical purpose

Bench: Shri Mahavir Prasad & Shri B.M. Biyani

43 taxmann.com 228. With these observations and findings, the Ld. CIT(A) confirmed the disallowance made by Ld. AO. 7. Before us, the Ld. AR opened his argument with the submission that the assessee is a University established under M.P. Vishwavidhalaya Adhiniyam, 1973, a legislation enacted by the state Govt. of Madhya Pradesh. Ld. AR submitted that the assessee

RADHAKRISHNA AKSHAR VIKAS NYAS ,VIDISHA vs. THE ACIT 3 (1), BHOPAL

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyaniradhakrishna Akshar Vikas Acit 3(1) Nyas Bhopal Vs. Braj Colony Sironj Vidisha (Appellant / Assessee) (Respondent/ Revenue) Pan: Aaatr 8725M Assessee By S/Shri Sumit Nema, Sr. Adv. & Gagan Tiwari Adv. Revenue By Shri Ashish Porwal, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 29.01.2024 Date Of Pronouncement 21.02.2024

charitable Trust, [2014] 43 taxmann.com 315 (Karnataka). 4. The Ld. A.O has erred in law and on facts in making the addition of Rs. 10,00,000/- to the total income of the appellant on account of treating unsecured loans as the unexplained cash credit u/s. 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. 5. That the Ld. A.O has failed

SHRIDHAR GYAN PRASAR PARMARTHIK TRUST, RAJGAD,RAJGAD vs. CIT EXEMPTION, BHOPAL

In the result, assessee’s appeal in 9

Bench: Hon’Ble Rajpal Yadav & Hon’Ble Manish Boradvirtual Hearing Shri Shridhar Gyan Prasar Parmarthik Trust Rajgad Pan :Aafts0410D : Appellant

1. YAMUNAJI MANDIR TRUST vs. CIT, ITAT, RAJKOT S. S. GODARA, JM & MANISH BORAD, AM, ITA No. 330/Rjt/2015, 18/01/2016, (2016) 46 CCH 0265 Rajkot Trib, (2016) 46 ITR (Trib) 0283 (Rajkot) 2. SHIV MANDIR DEVSTTAN PANCH COMMITTEE SANSTAN vs CIT, ITAT NAGPUR, 2009, 11/10/2012,(2012) 34 CCH 0108, 150 TTJ 0452: (2012), 3. Umaid Charitable Trust vs. Union of India

AARAMBH FOUNDATION,INDORE vs. THE CIT EXEMPTION, BYHOPAL

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyaniaarambh Foundation Cit-(Exemption) 220 Saket Nagar Bhopal Saket Nagar Vs. Indore (Appellant / Assessee) (Respondent/ Revenue) Pan: Aabaa 0609F Assessee By Shri Kunal Agrawal Ar Revenue By Shri Ashish Porwal, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 12.12.2023 Date Of Pronouncement 04.01.2024

1. The Ld. CIT grossly erred in issuing order rejecting application for registration under section 12AB of the Act. 2. The Ld. CIT grossly erred on facts and also in law by considering charitable activities as commercial activities and rejecting application for registration under section 12AB of the Act. 3. The Ld. CIT grossly erred on facts and also

THE DCIT(EXEMPTION), BHOPAL vs. M/S. INDORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, INDORE

In the result, appeal of the revenue for A

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Manish Boradassessment Years: 2011-12 Indore Development Authority, Dcit-5(1) बनाम/ Ida Building,7, Race Course Indore Vs. Road, Indore (Appellant) (Revenue) Pan: Aaaji0103J Assessment Year: 2011-12 Dcit- Indore Development Authority, बनाम/ (Exemption) Ida Building,7, Race Course Vs. Road, Indore Bhopal (Revenue) (Respondent) Pan: Aaaji0103J Assessment Years: 2012-13 Indore Development Authority, Dcit-5(1) बनाम/ Ida Building,7, Race Course Indore Vs. Road, Indore (Appellant) (Revenue)

Trust and others vs. ITO (2015) 9 TMI 902 (I.T.A.T., Amr) 3. CIT vs. Jodhpur Development Authority (2016) 139 DTR (Raj.) 1 4. ACIT vs. Modipon Ltd. & Vice-versa (2015) 12 TMI 460 (I.T.A.T., Del.) Indore Development Authority ITANos.847 870 & 1355/Ind/2016 37. We, therefore, in the given facts and circumstances of the case and following the judicial precedence as well