M/S SHREE JAIRAM EDUCATION SOCIETY,BHOPAL vs. PR. CIT (CENTRAL), BHOPAL

In the result, appeal of the assessee in ITANo

Bench: Hon’Ble Rajpal Yadav & Shri Manish Boradvirtual Hearing

ii) and section 13(3). Violation of provisions of section 13 cannot be a basis for cancellation of registration u/s 12AA. Impugned order cancelling the registration u/s 12AA ought to be quashed. D. Apropos ground no. 7 – payment of excess salary, funds of the charitable trust were siphoned out and used by the members of the charitable society, fee receipts

M/S SHREE JAIRAM EDUCATION SOCIETY,BHOPAL vs. ACIT CENTRAL-II, BHOPAL

In the result, appeal of the assessee in ITANo

Bench: Hon’Ble Rajpal Yadav & Shri Manish Boradvirtual Hearing

ii) and section 13(3). Violation of provisions of section 13 cannot be a basis for cancellation of registration u/s 12AA. Impugned order cancelling the registration u/s 12AA ought to be quashed. D. Apropos ground no. 7 – payment of excess salary, funds of the charitable trust were siphoned out and used by the members of the charitable society, fee receipts

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION) CIRCLE BHOPAL, BHOPAL vs. MAYANK WELFARE SOCIETY, INDORE

In the result, Revenue’s appeal for the AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Manish Borad & Ms. Madhumita Royvirtual Hearing Assessment Year: 2013-14

trust based on religious tenets - Activities of trust both charitable and religious - benefits not exclusively meant for particular religious community - trust not disqualified to claim exemption - Income-tax Act, 1961." 6.Income tax Officer vs. Gaudiua Granth Anuved Trust (2014) 23 ITJ 141 (Trib.-Agra) ITAT, Agra Bench "Income – U/s 2(24) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 - corpus Donation - Whether

THE DCIT, (EXEMPTION) CIRCLE, BHOPAL vs. M/S. MAYANK WELFARE SOCIETY, BHOPAL

In the result, Revenue’s appeal for the AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Manish Borad & Ms. Madhumita Royvirtual Hearing Assessment Year: 2013-14

trust based on religious tenets - Activities of trust both charitable and religious - benefits not exclusively meant for particular religious community - trust not disqualified to claim exemption - Income-tax Act, 1961." 6.Income tax Officer vs. Gaudiua Granth Anuved Trust (2014) 23 ITJ 141 (Trib.-Agra) ITAT, Agra Bench "Income – U/s 2(24) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 - corpus Donation - Whether

HARDA NAGAR BAL VIKAS SAMITI HARDA ,SARSWATI SHISHU MANDIR vs. ITO-1, HARDA, BHOPAL

Appeal is allowed for statistical purposes in terms mentioned above

36,39,736\n42,46,993\nSince the annual receipts exceeded the eligibility limit, the assessee ceased to be eligible for exemption u/s 10(23C)(iiiad) from AY 2017-18. Therefore, the assessee filed an application to CIT(Exemption), Bhopal [“CIT(E)”] for grant of approval for exemption u/s 10(23C)(vi). Such application was admittedly filed

SARSWATI VIDHYA PRATISHTHAN M.P ,BHUPAL vs. THE ACIT 2(1), BHOPAL

In the result, appeal of assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyanisarswati Vidhya Pratishthan Dcit (E) M.P. Bhopal Vs. 01, Harshwardhan Nagar Bhopal (Appellant / Assessee) (Respondent/ Revenue) Pan: Aadas0899M Assessee By Shri Santosh Deshmukh & Shri Parth Jhawar, Ars Revenue By Shri Ashish Porwal, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 23.08.2023 Date Of Pronouncement 30.08.2023

section 263 on 28.12.2017 thereby the expenditure of Rs.98,45,124/- on account of Vaman Drishti Shivir has been disallowed as application of income for charitable purpose. Aggrieved by the assessment order the assesse filed the appeal before the Ld. CIT(A) but could not succeed. 3. Before the Tribunal Ld. AR of the assesse has submitted that the assesse

SHRI PARSHVANATH DIGAMBAR JAIN DHARMIK AND SAMAJIK SANSTHA,RAM GALI, NEEMUCH CANT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, AAYKAR BHAWAN INDORE

Appeal is allowed for statistical purpose

ii) collection of 'Boli' amounts for religious activities (₹251-₹10,000); and (iii)\nimmediate cash payment by the Bolidar against receipts, deposited directly into the donation box\nin the presence of witnesses to ensure transparency.\n8. The Appellant further submitted that during the Chaturmas of Acharya Shri Vidhyasagarji\nMaharaj (July-November 2016), a rare religious event attended by thousands

DEVI ANUSUIYA VIDYA SANSTHAN,INDORE vs. CIT(A), NFAC, DELHI

Appeal is allowed for statistical purposes

36 (Appeal Memo).\n2. The background facts leading to present appeal are as under:\nDevi Anusuiya Vidya Sansthan\nITA No. 472/Ind/2025 – AY 2020-21\n(i)\nThe assessee is a charitable institution registered u/s 12A of Income-\ntax Act, 1961 by Income-tax Department and eligible to claim\nexemption u/s 11/12 of the Act.\n(ii)\nOn 31.03.2021, the assessee

MADHYA PRADESH INDUSTRIAL FOUNDATION,POLOGROUND, INDUSTRIAL STATE vs. EXEMPTION WARD INDORE, MAIN BUILDING, INDORE

Appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

36).\n2.\nThe registry has informed that the present appeals are delayed and\ntherefore time-barred. The assessee has filed an application/affidavit for\ncondonation of delay; the same is scanned and re-produced for an\nimmediate reference:\nMadhya Pradesh Industrial Foundation\nITA No. 147 & 148/Ind/2025\n3. The averments made by assessee in above affidavit, which are self-\nexplanarory and which

SHREE SHANTANU VIDHYAPEETH SOCIETY ,INDORE, M.P. vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, NFAC, DELHI, DELHI

Appeal is allowed for statistical purpose

charitable institutions and\ninstitutions engaged in public activity but there are certain conditions for that.\nA trust has to file its return of income, get its accounts audited, apply for\nregistration under section 12A. CBDT circular is of no help when a trust is\ndoing genuine work but it does not register it as a society, does not maintain\nproper

M/S. DEVI SHAKUNTALA THKARAL CHARITABLE FOUNDATION,BHOPAL vs. PR CIT ,CENTRAL, BHOPAL

In the result, this appeal of assessee is allowed

Bench: Ms. Madhumita Roy & Shri B.M. Biyani(Conducted Through Virtual Court)

trust granted u/s.12AA w.e.f. 01.04.2011, hence the order of the learned PCIT u/s.12AA be kindly cancelled. That on the facts & in the circumstances of the case and (6) in law, the findings of the learned PCIT that the income of the institution was being applied directly/indirectly for the benefit of trustees are wholly wrong, opposed to facts, injudicious and unlawful

MADHYA PRADESH INDUSTRIAL FOUNDATION,POLOGROUND, INDUSTRIAL STATE vs. EXEMPTION WARD INDORE, MAIN BUILDING, INDORE

Appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

36).\n2.\nThe registry has informed that the present appeals are delayed and\ntherefore time-barred. The assessee has filed an application/affidavit for\ncondonation of delay; the same is scanned and re-produced for an\nimmediate reference:\nMadhya Pradesh Industrial Foundation\nITA No. 147 & 148/Ind/2025\nMadhya Pradesh Industrial Foundation\nITA No. 147 & 148/Ind/2025\nभारतीय गैर न्यायिक\nएक सौ रुपये\nरु

ITO(EXEMPTION), INDORE vs. AROGYA SEVA MANDAL, BURHANPUR MADHYA PRADESH

Appeal is dismissed

36,198/- u/s 11/12. The assessee also filed audit-\nreport in Form No. 10B on 21.02.2022 though after due date of 15.02.2022\nbut before filing return of income. Thus, there was a delay of 6 days in filing\naudit report. The AO processed intimation u/s 143(1) wherein he denied\nassessee's exemption u/s 11/12 for non-filing of audit

M/S. M. P. COUNCIL FOR VOCATIONAL EDUCATION & TRAINING BHOPAL,BHOPAL vs. THE CIT (EXEMPYION) BHOPAL, BHOPAL

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

36,365/- as income of assessee on wrong basis and ignoring submissions made on record. ITA No. 177/Ind/2022 – A.Y.2017-18: 1. That on facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld. AO erred in making addition of Rs. 1,01,77,928/- income of assessee on wrong basis and ignoring submissions made on record. 2. That

M/S. M. P. COUNCIL FOR VOCATIONAL EDUCATION & TRAINING BHOPAL,BHOPAL vs. THE CIT (EXEMPYION) BHOPAL, BHOPAL

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

36,365/- as income of assessee on wrong basis and ignoring submissions made on record. ITA No. 177/Ind/2022 – A.Y.2017-18: 1. That on facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld. AO erred in making addition of Rs. 1,01,77,928/- income of assessee on wrong basis and ignoring submissions made on record. 2. That

DCIT(EXEMPTION), BHOPAL vs. VANASHPATI SMRITI SHIKSHA SAMITI, BHOPAL, BHOPAL

In the result the appeal of Revenue is dismissed and the cross- objection of assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Mahavir Prasad & Shri Bhagirath Mal Biyani(Virtual Hearing) & C.O. No.33/Ind/2021 Assessment Year: 2016-17 Dcit (Exemption) Vanashpati Smriti Bhopal Shiksha Samiti, Bhopal बनाम/ (Appellant / Revenue) (Respondent / Assessee) Vs. P.A. No. Aadts0547H Appellant By Shri P.K. Mitra Sr. Dr Respondent By Shri Pavan Ved, Ar Date Of Hearing: 03.03.2022 Date Of Pronouncement: 11.05.2022 आदेश / O R D E R

36. Precisely stated the facts are such that the assessee took loans for purchase of fixed assets in an earlier year and claimed cost of fixed assets as “application of income” for section 11 in that year. In subsequent year, when the assessee made repayments of those loans (to the extent of Rs. 31,42,25,109), the assessee claimed

NANCY ANN MILLER EDUCATIONAL TRUST,INDORE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER-EXEMPTION, INDORE

Appeal is allowed for statistical purpose

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyaniassessment Year : 2018-19 Nancy Ann Miller Income-Tax Officer, Educational Trust, Ward-(Exemption), बनाम/ 64/67, Dhar Kothi, Indore. Vs. Indore. (Assessee / Appellant) (Revenue / Respondent) Pan: Aaatn4010B Assessee By Shri S.S.Deshpande, Ca Revenue By Shri Ashish Porwal, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 08.05.2024 Date Of Pronouncement 16.05.2024

charitable trust registered under section 12AA of the Act and has been purportedly enjoying the benefits of section 11 since 2011. In the impugned assessment year, the benefit of exemption under section 11 of the Act has been denied to the assessee for the reason that assessee has failed to furnish audit report along with return of income. The contention

M/S. BHANDARI GROUP OF HOSPITALS & INSTITUTIONS,INDORE vs. THE CIT - I, INDORE

In the result, both the appeal of assessee in ITANo

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Manish Borad

ii. Complying with the terms as enumerated in the deed of trust iii. Maintaining proper books of accounts iv. Investing of income in a manner that is in accordance with the law v. No diversion of income or the assets of the trust vi. Applying income only for charitable or religious purposes in terms of the deed of trust