CHIRAYU CHARITABLE FOUNDATION,BHOPAL vs. PCIT (CENTRAL), BHOPAL

In the result appeal of the assessee stands allowed

Bench: Hon'Ble Kul Bharat & Hon'Ble Manish Boradchirayu Charitable Pcit (Central), Foundation,Bhopal Indore Bhopal Highway, Bhaisakhedi, Vs. Bhopal (Appellant) (Revenue ) Pan No.Aaaac3656P Revenue By Shri S.S. Mantri, Cit Appellant By S/Shri Sumit Nema, Sr. Advocate, Gagan Tiwari & Piyush Parashar, Advs Date Of Hearing 05.01.2021 Date Of Pronouncement .02.2021 O R D E R Per Manish Borad, Am.

2(1), Mumbai) of Zagdu Singh Charitable Trust for confirmation of donation given to the assessee. This letter was issued by the A.O. of the Zagdu Singh Charitable Trust in connection with the assessment proceedings pending for A.Y. 2014-15 of the said trust. Chirayu Charitable Foundation (iv) Copy of reply of the assessee in compliance to notice

M/S SHREE JAIRAM EDUCATION SOCIETY,BHOPAL vs. PR. CIT (CENTRAL), BHOPAL

In the result, appeal of the assessee in ITANo

Bench: Hon’Ble Rajpal Yadav & Shri Manish Boradvirtual Hearing

iv. Investing of income in a manner that is in accordance with the law v. No diversion of income or the assets of the trust vi. Applying income only for charitable or religious purposes in terms of the deed of trust. vii. Complying with all other provisions as required under the income tax or any other law. 10. The assessee

M/S SHREE JAIRAM EDUCATION SOCIETY,BHOPAL vs. ACIT CENTRAL-II, BHOPAL

In the result, appeal of the assessee in ITANo

Bench: Hon’Ble Rajpal Yadav & Shri Manish Boradvirtual Hearing

iv. Investing of income in a manner that is in accordance with the law v. No diversion of income or the assets of the trust vi. Applying income only for charitable or religious purposes in terms of the deed of trust. vii. Complying with all other provisions as required under the income tax or any other law. 10. The assessee

THE DCIT, (EXEMPTION) CIRCLE, BHOPAL vs. M/S. MAYANK WELFARE SOCIETY, BHOPAL

In the result, Revenue’s appeal for the AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Manish Borad & Ms. Madhumita Royvirtual Hearing Assessment Year: 2013-14

trust based on religious tenets - Activities of trust both charitable and religious - benefits not exclusively meant for particular religious community - trust not disqualified to claim exemption - Income-tax Act, 1961." 6.Income tax Officer vs. Gaudiua Granth Anuved Trust (2014) 23 ITJ 141 (Trib.-Agra) ITAT, Agra Bench "Income – U/s 2(24) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 - corpus Donation - Whether

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION) CIRCLE BHOPAL, BHOPAL vs. MAYANK WELFARE SOCIETY, INDORE

In the result, Revenue’s appeal for the AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Manish Borad & Ms. Madhumita Royvirtual Hearing Assessment Year: 2013-14

trust based on religious tenets - Activities of trust both charitable and religious - benefits not exclusively meant for particular religious community - trust not disqualified to claim exemption - Income-tax Act, 1961." 6.Income tax Officer vs. Gaudiua Granth Anuved Trust (2014) 23 ITJ 141 (Trib.-Agra) ITAT, Agra Bench "Income – U/s 2(24) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 - corpus Donation - Whether

SARSWATI VIDHYA PRATISHTHAN M.P ,BHUPAL vs. THE ACIT 2(1), BHOPAL

In the result, appeal of assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyanisarswati Vidhya Pratishthan Dcit (E) M.P. Bhopal Vs. 01, Harshwardhan Nagar Bhopal (Appellant / Assessee) (Respondent/ Revenue) Pan: Aadas0899M Assessee By Shri Santosh Deshmukh & Shri Parth Jhawar, Ars Revenue By Shri Ashish Porwal, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 23.08.2023 Date Of Pronouncement 30.08.2023

iv. Gujarat High Court in the case of DIT (Exemption) v. Ahmedabad Management Association [2014] 47 taxmann.com 162/225 Taxman 223/366 ITR 85 4. On the other hand, Ld. DR has submitted that the expenditure in question has been incurred by the assessee on the occasion of Silver Jubilee Celebration which shows that it has nothing to do with the objects

M/S TRUBA EDUCATION SOCIETY ,BHOPAL vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL) BHOPAL, BHOPAL

trust which is evident from such observation\nand/or decision made by the Ld. PCIT. In fact, on that score alone the order\npassed by the Ld. PCIT is also found to be bad in law and liable to be quashed.\nWith the aforesaid observations we thus, quash the impugned order passed by\nthe Ld. PCIT.\n24.\nThe assessee's appeal

M/S SHISHUKUNJ EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY,THE SHISHUKUNJ INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL, GRAM JHALARIA vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL), DIRECTOR GENERAL OF INCOME TAX. AAYKAR BHAWAN,

trust which is evident from such observation\nand/or decision made by the Ld. PCIT. In fact, on that score alone the order\npassed by the Ld. PCIT is also found to be bad in law and liable to be quashed.\nWith the aforesaid observations we thus, quash the impugned order passed by\nthe Ld. PCIT.\n24. The assessee's appeal

DCIT(EXEMPTION), BHOPAL vs. VANASHPATI SMRITI SHIKSHA SAMITI, BHOPAL, BHOPAL

In the result the appeal of Revenue is dismissed and the cross- objection of assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Mahavir Prasad & Shri Bhagirath Mal Biyani(Virtual Hearing) & C.O. No.33/Ind/2021 Assessment Year: 2016-17 Dcit (Exemption) Vanashpati Smriti Bhopal Shiksha Samiti, Bhopal बनाम/ (Appellant / Revenue) (Respondent / Assessee) Vs. P.A. No. Aadts0547H Appellant By Shri P.K. Mitra Sr. Dr Respondent By Shri Pavan Ved, Ar Date Of Hearing: 03.03.2022 Date Of Pronouncement: 11.05.2022 आदेश / O R D E R

iv) Mr. Singh was administering the activities of all seven institutes of the assessee which comprised of 4 engineering colleges, 1 pharmacy, 1 MBA and 1 B.Ed. college; (v) Mr. Singh was devoting majority of his time and efforts to the assessee and not to his own activities; and (vi) Mr. Singh had been working

M/S INDORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,INDORE vs. THE ACIT (EXEMPTION) CIRCLE, BHOPAL

In the result, appeal of the revenue for A

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Manish Boradassessment Years: 2011-12 Indore Development Authority, Dcit-5(1) बनाम/ Ida Building,7, Race Course Indore Vs. Road, Indore (Appellant) (Revenue) Pan: Aaaji0103J Assessment Year: 2011-12 Dcit- Indore Development Authority, बनाम/ (Exemption) Ida Building,7, Race Course Vs. Road, Indore Bhopal (Revenue) (Respondent) Pan: Aaaji0103J Assessment Years: 2012-13 Indore Development Authority, Dcit-5(1) बनाम/ Ida Building,7, Race Course Indore Vs. Road, Indore (Appellant) (Revenue)

iv) Your Honours, it shall be observed that the assessee Authority, in order to maintain the accounting method, has given such treatment to the Salary Expenses consistently over the last many years and such treatment, being 18 Indore Development Authority ITANos.847 870 & 1355/Ind/2016 perfectly in accordance with the accounting method followed by the assessee, has duly been accepted and allowed

M/S INDORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,INDORE vs. THE DCIT, 5(1), INDORE

In the result, appeal of the revenue for A

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Manish Boradassessment Years: 2011-12 Indore Development Authority, Dcit-5(1) बनाम/ Ida Building,7, Race Course Indore Vs. Road, Indore (Appellant) (Revenue) Pan: Aaaji0103J Assessment Year: 2011-12 Dcit- Indore Development Authority, बनाम/ (Exemption) Ida Building,7, Race Course Vs. Road, Indore Bhopal (Revenue) (Respondent) Pan: Aaaji0103J Assessment Years: 2012-13 Indore Development Authority, Dcit-5(1) बनाम/ Ida Building,7, Race Course Indore Vs. Road, Indore (Appellant) (Revenue)

iv) Your Honours, it shall be observed that the assessee Authority, in order to maintain the accounting method, has given such treatment to the Salary Expenses consistently over the last many years and such treatment, being 18 Indore Development Authority ITANos.847 870 & 1355/Ind/2016 perfectly in accordance with the accounting method followed by the assessee, has duly been accepted and allowed

THE DCIT(EXEMPTION), BHOPAL vs. M/S. INDORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, INDORE

In the result, appeal of the revenue for A

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Manish Boradassessment Years: 2011-12 Indore Development Authority, Dcit-5(1) बनाम/ Ida Building,7, Race Course Indore Vs. Road, Indore (Appellant) (Revenue) Pan: Aaaji0103J Assessment Year: 2011-12 Dcit- Indore Development Authority, बनाम/ (Exemption) Ida Building,7, Race Course Vs. Road, Indore Bhopal (Revenue) (Respondent) Pan: Aaaji0103J Assessment Years: 2012-13 Indore Development Authority, Dcit-5(1) बनाम/ Ida Building,7, Race Course Indore Vs. Road, Indore (Appellant) (Revenue)

iv) Your Honours, it shall be observed that the assessee Authority, in order to maintain the accounting method, has given such treatment to the Salary Expenses consistently over the last many years and such treatment, being 18 Indore Development Authority ITANos.847 870 & 1355/Ind/2016 perfectly in accordance with the accounting method followed by the assessee, has duly been accepted and allowed

THE DCIT1(1), INDORE vs. M/S. AVILABLE FINANCE LTD., INDORE

Bench: Hon’Ble Kul Bharat & Hon’Ble Manish Boradassessment Year 2010-11

iv) CIT vs. Navodaya Castles Pvt. Ltd.(2014) 367 ITR 0306 (v) CIT vs. N Tarika Properties Investment Pvt. Ltd. (2013)86 CCH 0368 (vi) ITO vs. Vaibhav Cotton Pvt. Ltd. (2012) 20 ITJ 422 Trib. – Indore (vii) ITO vs. M/s. Saaj Plastic Industries Pvt. Ltd. (2012) 20 ITJ 103 (Trib.) Indore 15. Ld. Counsel for the assessee submitted that

M/S AD-MANUM FINANCE LTD.,INDORE vs. THEDCIT 1(1) , INDORE, INDORE

Bench: Hon’Ble Kul Bharat & Hon’Ble Manish Boradassessment Year 2010-11

iv) CIT vs. Navodaya Castles Pvt. Ltd.(2014) 367 ITR 0306 (v) CIT vs. N Tarika Properties Investment Pvt. Ltd. (2013)86 CCH 0368 (vi) ITO vs. Vaibhav Cotton Pvt. Ltd. (2012) 20 ITJ 422 Trib. – Indore (vii) ITO vs. M/s. Saaj Plastic Industries Pvt. Ltd. (2012) 20 ITJ 103 (Trib.) Indore 15. Ld. Counsel for the assessee submitted that

DY. CIT -1(1), INDORE vs. M/S. AGRAWAL TRANSPORT CORPORATION (P) LTD., INDORE

Bench: Hon’Ble Kul Bharat & Hon’Ble Manish Boradassessment Year 2010-11

iv) CIT vs. Navodaya Castles Pvt. Ltd.(2014) 367 ITR 0306 (v) CIT vs. N Tarika Properties Investment Pvt. Ltd. (2013)86 CCH 0368 (vi) ITO vs. Vaibhav Cotton Pvt. Ltd. (2012) 20 ITJ 422 Trib. – Indore (vii) ITO vs. M/s. Saaj Plastic Industries Pvt. Ltd. (2012) 20 ITJ 103 (Trib.) Indore 15. Ld. Counsel for the assessee submitted that