BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

7 results for “charitable trust”+ Section 164(2)clear

Sorted by relevance

Karnataka427Delhi196Mumbai133Bangalore103Chennai72Ahmedabad55Chandigarh53Jaipur41Pune36Cochin32Lucknow29Visakhapatnam17Calcutta16Kolkata10Indore7Agra5Cuttack4Nagpur4Surat4Amritsar4Telangana3Rajkot3Panaji3Allahabad3Hyderabad2Jabalpur2Jodhpur2Punjab & Haryana2Rajasthan2Ranchi1SC1Raipur1Patna1Andhra Pradesh1

Key Topics

Section 12A12Section 1111Section 1010Section 143(3)6Section 1473Section 153C3Section 123Reassessment3Reopening of Assessment3

M/S. M P AUDYOGIK KENDRA VIKAS NIGAM (BHOPAL),BHOPAL vs. THE CIT (EXEMPTION), BHOPAL

In the result, appeal of the Assessee in ITANo

ITA 217/IND/2015[-]Status: DisposedITAT Indore21 Jan 2019

Bench: Hon'Ble Kul Bharat & And Hon'Ble Manish Boradassessment Year: M.P. Audyogik Kendra Cit(Exemption) Vikas Nigam, Bhopal Bhopal बनाम/ (Appellant) (Revenue ) Vs. P.A. No.Aaccm6048F Appellant By Shri Praveen N. Surange, Adv. Revenue By Smt. Ashima Gupta, Cit-Dr Date Of Hearing: 28.12.2018 Date Of Pronouncement: 22.01.2019

Section 12ASection 25

section 2(15) of the Income Tax Act and still followed by various High Courts as well as ITAT. J.Because impugned order is contrary to order passed by Hon'ble Gujrat High Court in Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Kandla Port Trust reported in (2014) 364 ITR 164 (Guj), relying on the judgment passed by Hon'ble Apex Court

M/S. GYAN SAGAR SOCIETY,INDORE vs. THE DCIT CIRCLE 1(1), INDORE

In the result the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

Disallowance3
Section 252
Exemption2
ITA 643/IND/2014[2010-11]Status: Disposed
ITAT Indore
26 Jul 2018
AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Manish Boradassessment Year: 2010-11 Gyan Sagar Society, Deputy Commissioner Of C/O Mahesh Thahirani, Vs. Income Tax-Circle 1(1), L, Triveni Colony, Indore Indore (Appellant) (Respondent ) Pan No.Akgpj5075N Revenue By Shri K.G. Goyal, Sr. Dr Assessee By Shri Morish Goyal & N.D. Patwa, Advocates Date Of Hearing 17.7.2018 Date Of 26.7.2018 Pronouncement

Section 10(23)(VI)Section 11Section 12Section 12ASection 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 2(15)

charitable in nature and not commercial. As held in the order for rejection of application u/s 10(23c) (VI) of I.T. Act, though schools are run by appellant for imparting education, but fees charged shows that they are run as commercial ventures and not run for poor and needy. 10. But the main objection raised by Assessing Officer in present

M/S. N.T.THOMAS MEMORIAL EDUCATIONAL AND DEVELOPMENT SOCIETY,INDORE vs. THE ACIT 1(2), INDORE

In the result the appeal of the Revenue is partly allowed

ITA 139/IND/2015[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Indore29 Mar 2017AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri C.M.Garg & Shri O.P.Meena1.आ.अ.सं./ I.T.A. No. 139/Ind/2015 2. I.T.A. No. 150/Ind/2015 "नधा"रण वष" /Assessment Year:2011-12

Section 10Section 11Section 12ASection 14(3)Section 143(3)Section 68

164 ITR 439 (Raj.) and committed no error in holding this issue in favour of the assessee.” 8. We are of the view that excess expenditure incurred for charitable purposes in the year is liable to be adjusted against the income of the succeeding year which computing taxable income of the succeeding year. Since, the provision of Section

THE ITO, (EXEMPTION), INDORE vs. M/S. N.T.THOMAS MEMORIAL EDUCATIONAL & DEVELOPMENT SOCIETY, INDORE

In the result the appeal of the Revenue is partly allowed

ITA 150/IND/2015[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Indore29 Mar 2017AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri C.M.Garg & Shri O.P.Meena1.आ.अ.सं./ I.T.A. No. 139/Ind/2015 2. I.T.A. No. 150/Ind/2015 "नधा"रण वष" /Assessment Year:2011-12

Section 10Section 11Section 12ASection 14(3)Section 143(3)Section 68

164 ITR 439 (Raj.) and committed no error in holding this issue in favour of the assessee.” 8. We are of the view that excess expenditure incurred for charitable purposes in the year is liable to be adjusted against the income of the succeeding year which computing taxable income of the succeeding year. Since, the provision of Section

DY. CIT -1(1), INDORE vs. M/S. AGRAWAL TRANSPORT CORPORATION (P) LTD., INDORE

ITA 651/IND/2019[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Indore14 Oct 2020AY 2010-11

Bench: Hon’Ble Kul Bharat & Hon’Ble Manish Boradassessment Year 2010-11

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 153C

164 of the paper book PB-B·I. Both the companies are also assessed by their respective jurisdictional AOs, wherein assessments have also been carried out, the assessment proceedings were attended and assessment orders were passed. The copies of various have also been placed on record. All these undisputed facts cumulatively establish the identity of both these companies which

M/S AD-MANUM FINANCE LTD.,INDORE vs. THEDCIT 1(1) , INDORE, INDORE

ITA 331/IND/2018[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Indore14 Oct 2020AY 2009-10

Bench: Hon’Ble Kul Bharat & Hon’Ble Manish Boradassessment Year 2010-11

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 153C

164 of the paper book PB-B·I. Both the companies are also assessed by their respective jurisdictional AOs, wherein assessments have also been carried out, the assessment proceedings were attended and assessment orders were passed. The copies of various have also been placed on record. All these undisputed facts cumulatively establish the identity of both these companies which

THE DCIT1(1), INDORE vs. M/S. AVILABLE FINANCE LTD., INDORE

ITA 895/IND/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Indore14 Oct 2020AY 2014-15

Bench: Hon’Ble Kul Bharat & Hon’Ble Manish Boradassessment Year 2010-11

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 153C

164 of the paper book PB-B·I. Both the companies are also assessed by their respective jurisdictional AOs, wherein assessments have also been carried out, the assessment proceedings were attended and assessment orders were passed. The copies of various have also been placed on record. All these undisputed facts cumulatively establish the identity of both these companies which