BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

10 results for “charitable trust”+ Section 148clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai259Delhi246Chennai127Bangalore106Hyderabad76Pune56Jaipur51Kolkata41Ahmedabad40Lucknow31Allahabad31Chandigarh26Cochin14Agra11Indore10Visakhapatnam8Amritsar8Karnataka8Patna7Guwahati7Raipur6Nagpur6Calcutta6Jodhpur5Rajkot4SC4Jabalpur3Kerala3Dehradun3Cuttack3Surat3Andhra Pradesh2Himachal Pradesh2Rajasthan2

Key Topics

Section 12A31Section 1019Section 1488Section 117Exemption5Addition to Income5Section 139(1)4Section 1444Section 142(1)4Section 271(1)(c)

M/S SHREE JAIRAM EDUCATION SOCIETY,BHOPAL vs. PR. CIT (CENTRAL), BHOPAL

In the result, appeal of the assessee in ITANo

ITA 90/IND/2019[-]Status: DisposedITAT Indore13 Oct 2021

Bench: Hon’Ble Rajpal Yadav & Shri Manish Boradvirtual Hearing

Section 12ASection 132Section 143(2)Section 148Section 37

charitable society. (iv) That the fee receipts were not being fully reflected in the audited accounts, leading to siphoning of the same and this way the funds of the trust were misappropriating by the members of the trust. All the above findings are wholly incorrect, injudicious and unlawful and, therefore, the same be quashed and it be held that

M/S SHREE JAIRAM EDUCATION SOCIETY,BHOPAL vs. ACIT CENTRAL-II, BHOPAL

In the result, appeal of the assessee in ITANo

4
Cash Deposit3
Penalty3
ITA 548/IND/2019[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Indore13 Oct 2021AY 2010-11

Bench: Hon’Ble Rajpal Yadav & Shri Manish Boradvirtual Hearing

Section 12ASection 132Section 143(2)Section 148Section 37

charitable society. (iv) That the fee receipts were not being fully reflected in the audited accounts, leading to siphoning of the same and this way the funds of the trust were misappropriating by the members of the trust. All the above findings are wholly incorrect, injudicious and unlawful and, therefore, the same be quashed and it be held that

M/S TRUBA EDUCATION SOCIETY ,BHOPAL vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL) BHOPAL, BHOPAL

ITA 801/IND/2024[2023-24]Status: DisposedITAT Indore24 Apr 2025AY 2023-24
Section 11Section 127(2)Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)Section 132Section 133ASection 143(3)Section 147Section 2(15)

sections (1)\nand (2), the Board or other income-tax authority authorised by it\nmay have regard to any one or more of the following criteria, namely:-\n(a) territorial area;\n(b) persons or classes of persons;\n(c) incomes or classes of income; and\n(d) cases or classes of cases.\nTherefore, in furtherance of the said provisions

HARDA NAGAR BAL VIKAS SAMITI HARDA ,SARSWATI SHISHU MANDIR vs. ITO-1, HARDA, BHOPAL

Appeal is allowed for statistical purposes in terms mentioned above

ITA 419/IND/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Indore06 May 2025AY 2017-18
Section 10Section 115BSection 139Section 139(1)Section 142(1)(i)Section 144Section 69ASection 80P

148.\n20. Section 139 falls under Chapter XIV-'Procedure for assessment' which provides procedures and conditions for filing of return of income. Section 139(1) mandates every person having income exceeding the maximum amount not chargeable to tax to file return of income. Similarly, section 139(1) (4A) mandates that every person in receipt of income derived from property held

NATIONAL LAW INSTITUTE UNIVERSITY ,BHOPAL vs. DCIT(EXEMPTION), BHOPAL

Appeal is allowed in terms mentioned above

ITA 423/IND/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Indore09 Oct 2025AY 2015-16
Section 11Section 12ASection 143(2)Section 143(3)

148, M.P. Nagar Zone 1. Bhopal Ph. No. 2763465, 2762593, 3012593\nTo\nThe Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption)\nBhopal\nSir,\nSub: Reply to your questionnaire u/s 142 (1) of Income Tax for A.Y 2015-16\nRef:- Queries raised during hearing\nIn regards to your query relating to mess fees, Rs 54275671/- has been added to the\nCapital Fund

SHRI GUPTNATH BAL SHIKSHAN SAMITI MACHALPUR,MACHALPUR vs. ITO WARD RAJGARH, RAJGARH

Appeal is allowed for statistical purposes in\nterms mentioned above

ITA 313/IND/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Indore30 Sept 2025AY 2017-18
Section 10Section 10ASection 131Section 139Section 139(1)Section 142(1)Section 144Section 270ASection 80A

148.\n20. Section 139 falls under Chapter XIV-'Procedure for assessment'\nwhich provides procedures and conditions for filing of return of\nincome. Section 139(1) mandates every person having income\nexceeding the maximum amount not chargeable to tax to file return of\nincome. Similarly, section 139(1) (4A) mandates that every person in\nreceipt of income derived from property held

PRASAM RAKESH CHOUDHARY,GIRNAR SOCIETY, BAPURAO GALLI, ITWARI, NAGPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL -1, BHOPAL , BHOPAL

Appeal is dismissed

ITA 529/IND/2025[2018 -2019]Status: HeardITAT Indore22 Dec 2025

Bench: Ms. Suchitra R. Kamble & Shri B.M. Biyaniacit Circle-1(1) M/S. Rashtriya Takniki Bhopal Shikshak Prashikshan Evam Anunsandhan Sansthan बनाम/ Samiti, Vs. Bhopal (Revenue/Appellant) (Assessee/Respondent) Pan: Aabar2266H Assessee By Shri Ashish Porwal, Sr. Dr Revenue By Shri Vinod Joshi, Ar Date Of Hearing 08.12.2025 Date Of Pronouncement 22.12.2025

Section 10Section 271(1)(c)Section 43(1)

charitable trust registered under section 12A of the Income Tax Act (the Act). The income of the appellant is exempt u/s. 10(23C) of the Act. The appellant filed the return of income for the impugned A.Y. declaring Nil income after claiming exemption under section 11 of the Act. An order u/s. 143(3) r.w.s. 263 was passed in which

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-1(1), BHOPOAL, BHOPAL vs. M/S RASHTRIYA TAKNIKI SHIKSHAK PRASHIKSHAN EVAM ANUNSANDHAN SANSTHAN, BHOPAL

Appeal is dismissed

ITA 509/IND/2025[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Indore22 Dec 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Ms. Suchitra R. Kamble & Shri B.M. Biyaniacit Circle-1(1) M/S. Rashtriya Takniki Bhopal Shikshak Prashikshan Evam Anunsandhan Sansthan बनाम/ Samiti, Vs. Bhopal (Revenue/Appellant) (Assessee/Respondent) Pan: Aabar2266H Assessee By Shri Ashish Porwal, Sr. Dr Revenue By Shri Vinod Joshi, Ar Date Of Hearing 08.12.2025 Date Of Pronouncement 22.12.2025

Section 10Section 271(1)(c)Section 43(1)

charitable trust registered under section 12A of the Income Tax Act (the Act). The income of the appellant is exempt u/s. 10(23C) of the Act. The appellant filed the return of income for the impugned A.Y. declaring Nil income after claiming exemption under section 11 of the Act. An order u/s. 143(3) r.w.s. 263 was passed in which

SHREE TEKCHANDJI MAHARAJ TRUST,UJJAIN vs. ASSESSING OFFICER, UJJAIN

ITA 537/IND/2025[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Indore30 Jan 2026AY 2016-17
Section 133(6)Section 139(1)Section 142(1)Section 144Section 147Section 148Section 148ASection 250Section 253Section 69A

148 of the IT Act.:-\n1. Copy of I.T. Return with its all annexure alongwith computation of Income and Tax\nAudit Report.\n2. In this case as per ITBA system it is observed that assessee has not filed his Return\nof Income for A.Y.2016-17. As per data available with this office, on perusal &\nverification of ITS details and AIR information

M/S CHOUHAN EDUCATION SOCIETY,BHOPAL vs. THE ACIT 1(1), BHOPAL

In the result, appeal of assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 193/IND/2009[2000-01]Status: DisposedITAT Indore02 Mar 2023AY 2000-01

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyanim/S. Chouhan Education Acit 1(1) Society Bhopal Vs. E-8, Trilanga, Shahpura, Bhopal (Appellant / Assessee) (Respondent/ Revenue) Pan: Aaatc 551 Q Assessee By Ms. Nisha Lahoti & Shri Vijay Bansal, Ars Revenue By Shri Ashish Porwal, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 27.02.2023 Date Of Pronouncement 02.03.2023

Section 10Section 10(23)(C)Section 10(23)(iiiad)Section 11Section 12ASection 148

148 dated 08.03.2006 and framed assessment by taking the excess of income over expenditure as well as grant in aid receipt by the assessee, as total income of the assessee at Rs. 36,05,590/-. The assessee challenged the action of the Ld. AO before the Ld. CIT(A) and contending that the assessee satisfied the conditions as provided