M/S TRUBA EDUCATION SOCIETY ,BHOPAL vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL) BHOPAL, BHOPAL

Charitable\n- Society, New Delhi Vs. Principal Commissioner of Income-tax,\nNew Delhi, (2024) 166 taxmann.com 324 (Delhi Trib.), order\ndated 22.08.2024:\nM/s Truba Education Society\nITA No. 801/Ind/2024\n“20. So far as the provision of Section 12AB(4) of the Act as exercised by the\nPCIT is concerned, the Ld. A.R relied upon a judgment passed

M/S. M.P. BOARD OF SECONDARY EDUCATION,BHOPAL vs. THE DCIT EXCEMPTION , BHOPAL

Appeal is allowed

115 CTR (Guj) 325; CIT v. Apostolos\nRaptakos Trust [1995] 83 Taxman 422 (Bom.), CIT v. Trustee of H.E.H.\nthe Nizam's Supplemental Religious Endowment Trust [1981] 127 ITR\n378 (AP). However, we note from the assessment-order that the appellant\nsociety had debited the above provision for taxation to income and\nexpenditure account. The Assessing Officer had adopted

M/S MADHYA PRADESH MADHYAM,BHOPAL vs. THE ACIT, BHOPAL

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee i

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Manish Borad

Trust's (1992) 3 SCC 390 a decision relating to property tax, the Supreme Court held that both qualitative and quantitative tests should be satisfied in view of specific language of Section 115(4)(a) of Delhi Municipal Corporation Act 1957. Nevertheless it negated and rejected the argument that data for one year should be taken into consideration

M/S MADHYA PRADESH MADHYAM,BHOPAL vs. THE ACIT 1(2), BHOPAL

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee i

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Manish Borad

Trust's (1992) 3 SCC 390 a decision relating to property tax, the Supreme Court held that both qualitative and quantitative tests should be satisfied in view of specific language of Section 115(4)(a) of Delhi Municipal Corporation Act 1957. Nevertheless it negated and rejected the argument that data for one year should be taken into consideration

M/S SHISHUKUNJ EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY,THE SHISHUKUNJ INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL, GRAM JHALARIA vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL), DIRECTOR GENERAL OF INCOME TAX. AAYKAR BHAWAN,

Charitable\n- Society, New Delhi Vs. Principal Commissioner of Income-tax,\nNew Delhi, (2024) 166 taxmann.com 324 (Delhi Trib.), order\ndated 22.08.2024:\n“20. So far as the provision of Section 12AB(4) of the Act as exercised by the\nPCIT is concerned, the Ld. A.R relied upon a judgment passed by the Banglore\nBench in the case of Islamic

RADHAKRISHNA AKSHAR VIKAS NYAS ,VIDISHA vs. THE ACIT 3 (1), BHOPAL

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyaniradhakrishna Akshar Vikas Acit 3(1) Nyas Bhopal Vs. Braj Colony Sironj Vidisha (Appellant / Assessee) (Respondent/ Revenue) Pan: Aaatr 8725M Assessee By S/Shri Sumit Nema, Sr. Adv. & Gagan Tiwari Adv. Revenue By Shri Ashish Porwal, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 29.01.2024 Date Of Pronouncement 21.02.2024

Charitable Trust, Chandigarg vs. DCIT, Central Circle 29, New Delhi order dated 19.10.2023 in ITANo.3801/Ind/2016 2. DCIT(E) Bhopal v. Mayank Welfare Society, Indore dated 29.10.2021 in ITANo.232/Ind/2017 3. Income Tax Officer, Ward-1, Exemption vs. Aishwarya Foundation Patna dated 03.05.2023 passed in ITANo.103/Pat/2020) 4. People Forum v. CIT 295 taxman 433 5. On the other hand

M.P.MADHYAM,BHOPAL vs. THE ACIT EXEMPTION, BHOPAL

In the result, appeals of assessee for A

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

Trust's (1992) 3 SCC 390 a decision relating to property tax, the Supreme Court held that both qualitative and quantitative tests should be satisfied in view of specific language of Section 115(4)(a) of Delhi Municipal Corporation Act 1957. Nevertheless it negated and rejected the argument that data for one year should be taken into consideration

M/S M.P. MADHYAM,BHOPAL vs. THE ACIT EXEMPTION, BHOPAL

In the result, appeals of assessee for A

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

Trust's (1992) 3 SCC 390 a decision relating to property tax, the Supreme Court held that both qualitative and quantitative tests should be satisfied in view of specific language of Section 115(4)(a) of Delhi Municipal Corporation Act 1957. Nevertheless it negated and rejected the argument that data for one year should be taken into consideration

M.P.MADHYAM,BHOPAL vs. THE ACIT EXEMPTION, BHOPAL

In the result, appeals of assessee for A

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

Trust's (1992) 3 SCC 390 a decision relating to property tax, the Supreme Court held that both qualitative and quantitative tests should be satisfied in view of specific language of Section 115(4)(a) of Delhi Municipal Corporation Act 1957. Nevertheless it negated and rejected the argument that data for one year should be taken into consideration

M.P.MADHYAM,BHOPAL vs. THE DCIT EXEMPTION, BHOPAL

In the result, appeals of assessee for A

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

Trust's (1992) 3 SCC 390 a decision relating to property tax, the Supreme Court held that both qualitative and quantitative tests should be satisfied in view of specific language of Section 115(4)(a) of Delhi Municipal Corporation Act 1957. Nevertheless it negated and rejected the argument that data for one year should be taken into consideration

THE NIMAR EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY,KHANDWA vs. THE EXEMPTION CIRCLE, BHOPAL

In the result, the appeal of assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyanithe Nimar Educational Society Cit(E) Harsud Road, Civil Lines Bhopal Vs. East Nimar, Khandwa (Appellant / Assessee) (Revenue) Pan: Aabtt 1409 K Assessee By Shri S.N. Agrwal, Ar Revenue By Shri Ashish Porwal, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 12.04.2023 Date Of Pronouncement 14.06.2023

trust which is not eligible for exemption is required to be allowed while computing total income of the assessee. The Hon’ble Delhi High Court in case of DCIT(E) vs. Petroleum Sports Promotion Board (supra) has held as under: “ 7. The learned standing counsel for the revenue submitted that the order of the Tribunal is untenable since it indirectly