M/S SHREE JAIRAM EDUCATION SOCIETY,BHOPAL vs. ACIT CENTRAL-II, BHOPAL

In the result, appeal of the assessee in ITANo

Bench: Hon’Ble Rajpal Yadav & Shri Manish Boradvirtual Hearing

Charitable or religious trust - Registration procedure (Cancellation of registration) - Assessee-trust was formed with an object of runnig a hospital and research centre - It was granted registration under section 12A in year 1979 and since then assessee had been claiming benefit of exemption prescribed under sections 11 and 13 - Subsequently, Commissioner took a view that manner of investment of trust

M/S. M.P. BOARD OF SECONDARY EDUCATION,BHOPAL vs. THE DCIT EXCEMPTION , BHOPAL

Appeal is allowed

charitable use, etc. We\nalso find that the CIT(A) has, in Paras 8 to 11 of impugned order, given a\ndiscussion of section 11(3) of the Act and stated that section 11(3) is\npunitive in nature but the consideration of section 11(3) by CIT(A) is itself\nun-related to present case of assessee. In conclusion

CHIRAYU CHARITABLE FOUNDATION,BHOPAL vs. PCIT (CENTRAL), BHOPAL

In the result appeal of the assessee stands allowed

Bench: Hon'Ble Kul Bharat & Hon'Ble Manish Boradchirayu Charitable Pcit (Central), Foundation,Bhopal Indore Bhopal Highway, Bhaisakhedi, Vs. Bhopal (Appellant) (Revenue ) Pan No.Aaaac3656P Revenue By Shri S.S. Mantri, Cit Appellant By S/Shri Sumit Nema, Sr. Advocate, Gagan Tiwari & Piyush Parashar, Advs Date Of Hearing 05.01.2021 Date Of Pronouncement .02.2021 O R D E R Per Manish Borad, Am.

4) Kolkata is identical to typical jama-kharchi entity. 11. In view of detailed discussion made as above, it is clear that the affairs of the Trust are not genuine and are not being carried out in accordance with the objects and aims of the Trust. The registration of the trust (Chirayu Charitable Foundation bearing PAN: AAAAC3656P) granted u/s 12AA

NATIONAL LAW INSTITUTE UNIVERSITY ,BHOPAL vs. DCIT(EXEMPTION), BHOPAL

Appeal is allowed in terms mentioned above

charitable\npurposes. In other words, it was not permitted to accumulate more than 25\nper cent of its total income. The question has been reconsidered by the Board\nand the correct legal position is explained below.\n2. Section 11(1) provides that subject to the provisions of sections 60 to 63,\n\"the following income shall not be included

M/S SHISHUKUNJ EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY,THE SHISHUKUNJ INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL, GRAM JHALARIA vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL), DIRECTOR GENERAL OF INCOME TAX. AAYKAR BHAWAN,

11, has committed any specified violation as defined\nin Explanation 2 to the fifteenth proviso to clause (23C) of section\n10 or the Explanation to sub-section (4) of section 12AB, as the case may\nbe, he shall—\n(a) send a reference to the Principal Commissioner or Commissioner to\nwithdraw the approval or registration, as the case

FAIZAN E BURHANE MILLAT TRUST,JABALPUR vs. THE CIT EXEMPTION, BHOPAL

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyanifaizan E Burhane Millat Cit(Exemption) Trust Bhopal 181/1, Baitla Colony Vfj Society, Ward Shaheed, Abdul Vs. Hameed, Raza Chowk Milk, Scheme Road, Jabalpur (Appellant / Assessee) (Respondent/ Revenue) Pan: Aaatf8671J Assessee By Shri Ashish Goyal & Nd Patwa, Ars Revenue By Shri Ashish Porwal, Sr. -Dr Date Of Hearing 13.02.2024 Date Of Pronouncement 20.03.2024

11 & 12 to the assesse trust. This tribunal in case of Dawat E Islami Chhatisgarh vs. CIT(E) in ITANo.431/Ind/2022 has considered the applicability of section 13(1)(b) in para 5 & 6 as under: “5. We have considered the rival submissions as well as relevant material on record. The CIT(E) has denied the registration to the assessee trust

M/S. DEVI SHAKUNTALA THKARAL CHARITABLE FOUNDATION,BHOPAL vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION), BHOPAL

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Manish Boradassessment Year: 2013-14 M/S. Devi Shakuntala Dcit Thakral Charitable (Exemption) बनाम/ Foundation Bhopal Vs. Bhopal (Appellant) (Revenue ) P.A. No.Aaatd2943B

trust or section 10(23C)(iv), 10(23C)(v), institution as mentioned in section 11(3)(d) 10(23C)(vi) or 10(23C)(via) From the above table it is evident that none of the conditions as mentioned in section 11(3) have been triggered in the instant case. Even if it had been so, addition if any would have

SHRI JAIN SHWETAMBER MURTIPUJAK SUKRAT FUND KAODA COMMITTEE,INDORE vs. CIT (EXEMPTION) BHOPAL, BHOPAL

In the result appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Manish Boradshri Jain Shwetamber Cit (Exemption) Bhopal Murtipujak Sukrat Fund Vs. Kapda Committee, 11/12, Mahavir Marg, Indore (Appellant) (Revenue ) Pan Aabts6859G Appellant By Shri Narendra Kumar Jain, Ca Revenue By Smt. Ashima Gupta, Cit Date Of Hearing 15.09.2020 Date Of Pronouncement 29.09.2020 O R D E R Per Manish Borad, Am. This Appeal Is Preferred By The Assessee Against The Order Of Ld. Cit

Charitable Trust under the provisions of sections 11 to 13 of the Income Tax Act 1961, may please be noted.(P.P. 24 to 32 of the paper book) 4

DIVYASDHANA CHARITALLE TRUST,INDORE vs. THE CIT (E) CIRCLE , BHOPAL

Appeals are allowed in terms indicated above

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

4(s). (iii) It is further submitted that section 80G(5B) overrides section 80G(5)(ii) as well as Explanation 3 to section 80G and provides that if the expenditure of religious nature does not exceed 5%, the trust shall be deemed to be covered u/s 80G(5). Therefore, the assessee could Page 7 of 12 Divya Sadhana Charitable Trust

DIVYASDHANA CHARITALLE TRUST,INDORE vs. THE CIT (E) CIRCLE , BHOPAL

Appeals are allowed in terms indicated above

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

4(s). (iii) It is further submitted that section 80G(5B) overrides section 80G(5)(ii) as well as Explanation 3 to section 80G and provides that if the expenditure of religious nature does not exceed 5%, the trust shall be deemed to be covered u/s 80G(5). Therefore, the assessee could Page 7 of 12 Divya Sadhana Charitable Trust

AKSHAY ACADEMY,INDORE, M.P. vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, NFAC, DELHI, THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, NFAC, DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyaniakshay Academy Ito, Nfac 32 Kaimaidan Road, Delhi Khasgi Gagicha Vs. Indore (Appellant / Assessee) (Respondent/ Revenue) Pan: Aadta8987B Assessee By Shri S.N. Agrawal, Ar Revenue By Shri Ram Kumar Yadav, Cit- Dr Date Of Hearing 06.08.2024 Date Of Pronouncement 20.08.2024

charitable trust. Sections 12A and 12AA detail the procedural requirements for making an application to claim exemptions under sections 11 and 12 by the assessee and the grant or rejection of such application by the commissioner. Thus, in my view, sections 12A and 12AA are only procedural in nature. Hence, it is not the registration u/s 12AA by itself that

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION) CIRCLE BHOPAL, BHOPAL vs. MAYANK WELFARE SOCIETY, INDORE

In the result, Revenue’s appeal for the AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Manish Borad & Ms. Madhumita Royvirtual Hearing Assessment Year: 2013-14

Section 11(4) is merely intended to tax income which is not accounted for in the books: it does not operate to charge a disclosed amount which is admittedly expended, for a purpose either charitable or non- charitable, but is disclos as business expenditure and consequently added back in computing the business income. [CIT v Birla Education Trust

THE DCIT, (EXEMPTION) CIRCLE, BHOPAL vs. M/S. MAYANK WELFARE SOCIETY, BHOPAL

In the result, Revenue’s appeal for the AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Manish Borad & Ms. Madhumita Royvirtual Hearing Assessment Year: 2013-14

Section 11(4) is merely intended to tax income which is not accounted for in the books: it does not operate to charge a disclosed amount which is admittedly expended, for a purpose either charitable or non- charitable, but is disclos as business expenditure and consequently added back in computing the business income. [CIT v Birla Education Trust

SHREE SHANTANU VIDHYAPEETH SOCIETY ,INDORE, M.P. vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, NFAC, DELHI, DELHI

Appeal is allowed for statistical purpose

charitable trust. Sections\n12A and 12AA detail the procedural requirements for\nmaking an application to claim exemptions under sections\n11 and 12 by the assessee and the grant or rejection of\nsuch application by the commissioner. Thus, in my\nview, sections 12A and 12AA are only procedural in\nnature. Hence, it is not the registration u/s 12AA by itself\nthat

M/S RAJIV GANDHI PROUDYOGIK VISHWAVIDHALYA,BHOPAL vs. CIT EXEMPTION, BHOPAL

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Manish Boradassessment Year: Na (12Aa)

11 of the Income Tax Act. 4. That section 2(15) defines the term ‘charitable purpose’ in an inclusive manner and includes within its ambit relief of poor, education, medical relief and advancement of any other object of general public utility. Education per se is a charitable purpose just like relief of poor or medical relief and the appellant university

MAHAVIR KUND KUND KAHAN TRUST,BARHANPUR vs. CIT(E) BHOPAL, BHOPAL

Bench: Shri Mahavir Prasad & Shri B.M. Biyani

charitable purposes. The decisions referred to by the learned counsel for the assessee squarely apply to this case. The findings of the CIT that the provisions of section 13(1)(b) apply to the assessee-trust is, therefore, set aside.” Ld. AR also made an alternative submission that even otherwise section 13(1)(b), which denies exemption u/s 11

CIT(E),BHOPAL, BHOPAL vs. SHRI MAHAVIR KUND KUND TRUST, UJJAIN

Bench: Shri Mahavir Prasad & Shri B.M. Biyani

charitable purposes. The decisions referred to by the learned counsel for the assessee squarely apply to this case. The findings of the CIT that the provisions of section 13(1)(b) apply to the assessee-trust is, therefore, set aside.” Ld. AR also made an alternative submission that even otherwise section 13(1)(b), which denies exemption u/s 11

M/S. ARIHANT CHERITABLE TRUST,INDORE vs. THE ITO (TDS)-1, INDORE

In the result, we find no force in the ground of the Revenue, hence dismissed

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Manish Boradassessment Year:2015-16

4 29,120 596 2,912 2,316 608 2,924 Total 87,360 6,948 2,073 9,021 1.3] The appellant entered into a contract with M/s Hoswin Incinerator Private Limited for collection and disposal of waste and M/s Hoswin Incinerator Private Limited did not provide any technical services to the appellant which was liable for deduction