M/S. DEVI SHAKUNTALA THKARAL CHARITABLE FOUNDATION,BHOPAL vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION), BHOPAL

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Manish Boradassessment Year: 2013-14 M/S. Devi Shakuntala Dcit Thakral Charitable (Exemption) बनाम/ Foundation Bhopal Vs. Bhopal (Appellant) (Revenue ) P.A. No.Aaatd2943B

trust or section 10(23C)(iv), 10(23C)(v), institution as mentioned in section 11(3)(d) 10(23C)(vi) or 10(23C)(via) From the above table it is evident that none of the conditions as mentioned in section 11(3) have been triggered in the instant case. Even if it had been so, addition if any would have

CHIRAYU CHARITABLE FOUNDATION,BHOPAL vs. PCIT (CENTRAL), BHOPAL

In the result appeal of the assessee stands allowed

Bench: Hon'Ble Kul Bharat & Hon'Ble Manish Boradchirayu Charitable Pcit (Central), Foundation,Bhopal Indore Bhopal Highway, Bhaisakhedi, Vs. Bhopal (Appellant) (Revenue ) Pan No.Aaaac3656P Revenue By Shri S.S. Mantri, Cit Appellant By S/Shri Sumit Nema, Sr. Advocate, Gagan Tiwari & Piyush Parashar, Advs Date Of Hearing 05.01.2021 Date Of Pronouncement .02.2021 O R D E R Per Manish Borad, Am.

11. In view of detailed discussion made as above, it is clear that the affairs of the Trust are not genuine and are not being carried out in accordance with the objects and aims of the Trust. The registration of the trust (Chirayu Charitable Foundation bearing PAN: AAAAC3656P) granted u/s 12AA is hereby cancelled by invoking sections 12AA(3

M/S TRUBA EDUCATION SOCIETY ,BHOPAL vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL) BHOPAL, BHOPAL

charitable activity as\nper the provisions of section 2(15) of the Act, and there is no change in the\naforesaid activity and hence withdrawal of registration u/s.12AB(4) of the\nAct on the ground that the activities of the trust are not in accordance with the\nobjects of the trust without pointing any such \"specified violations\" are wholly\nerroneous

M/S. M.P. BOARD OF SECONDARY EDUCATION,BHOPAL vs. THE DCIT EXCEMPTION , BHOPAL

Appeal is allowed

trust's corpus and thus qualifies as an application for charitable purposes under Section 11(1)(a). The lower authorities' observations regarding 'deemed income' and incentivizing defaults were found to be mis-conceived.", "result": "Allowed", "sections": [ "11(1)(a)", "11(1B)", "11(3

THE DCIT, (EXEMPTION) CIRCLE, BHOPAL vs. M/S. MAYANK WELFARE SOCIETY, BHOPAL

In the result, Revenue’s appeal for the AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Manish Borad & Ms. Madhumita Royvirtual Hearing Assessment Year: 2013-14

charitable, but is disclos as business expenditure and consequently added back in computing the business income. [CIT v Birla Education Trust (1985) 153 ITR 579 (Cal)]. Profit and gains from incidental business [Section (4A)]: Where a trust or an institution is also carrying on any business activity, the provisions of Section 11)1), (2), (3

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION) CIRCLE BHOPAL, BHOPAL vs. MAYANK WELFARE SOCIETY, INDORE

In the result, Revenue’s appeal for the AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Manish Borad & Ms. Madhumita Royvirtual Hearing Assessment Year: 2013-14

charitable, but is disclos as business expenditure and consequently added back in computing the business income. [CIT v Birla Education Trust (1985) 153 ITR 579 (Cal)]. Profit and gains from incidental business [Section (4A)]: Where a trust or an institution is also carrying on any business activity, the provisions of Section 11)1), (2), (3

M/S SHISHUKUNJ EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY,THE SHISHUKUNJ INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL, GRAM JHALARIA vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL), DIRECTOR GENERAL OF INCOME TAX. AAYKAR BHAWAN,

11(1)(a),\n11(1)(d), 13(1) & 13(3) and that it cannot be ground for cancellation of registration is against\nspecific provisions of explanation 2 to fifteenth proviso to clause (23C) of section 10 of the Act\ndefines "specified violation” which, inter-alia, covers "application of income derived from\nproperty held under trust other than the objects

SHRI JAIN SHWETAMBER MURTIPUJAK SUKRAT FUND KAODA COMMITTEE,INDORE vs. CIT (EXEMPTION) BHOPAL, BHOPAL

In the result appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Manish Boradshri Jain Shwetamber Cit (Exemption) Bhopal Murtipujak Sukrat Fund Vs. Kapda Committee, 11/12, Mahavir Marg, Indore (Appellant) (Revenue ) Pan Aabts6859G Appellant By Shri Narendra Kumar Jain, Ca Revenue By Smt. Ashima Gupta, Cit Date Of Hearing 15.09.2020 Date Of Pronouncement 29.09.2020 O R D E R Per Manish Borad, Am. This Appeal Is Preferred By The Assessee Against The Order Of Ld. Cit

3) of the Act as a registered Public Charitable Trust under the provisions of sections 11 to 13 of the Income

NATIONAL LAW INSTITUTE UNIVERSITY ,BHOPAL vs. DCIT(EXEMPTION), BHOPAL

Appeal is allowed in terms mentioned above

charitable or religious, and hence it will be charged to tax\nunder sub-section (3). As only the income disclosed in the account will\nbe eligible for exemption under section 11(1), the permitted\naccumulation of 25 per cent will also be calculated with reference to\nthis income.\n4. Where the trust

FAIZAN E BURHANE MILLAT TRUST,JABALPUR vs. THE CIT EXEMPTION, BHOPAL

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyanifaizan E Burhane Millat Cit(Exemption) Trust Bhopal 181/1, Baitla Colony Vfj Society, Ward Shaheed, Abdul Vs. Hameed, Raza Chowk Milk, Scheme Road, Jabalpur (Appellant / Assessee) (Respondent/ Revenue) Pan: Aaatf8671J Assessee By Shri Ashish Goyal & Nd Patwa, Ars Revenue By Shri Ashish Porwal, Sr. -Dr Date Of Hearing 13.02.2024 Date Of Pronouncement 20.03.2024

3. Without prejudice, the registration u / s 12AB ought to be granted in the facts and circumstances of the case.” 2. The assessee is a trust registered under M.P. Public Trust Act 1951 vide certificate dated 06.09.2021. As per the deed of declaration of Trust dated 07.01.2021 there are 29 objects to be achieved by the assessee trust. The assessee

AKSHAY ACADEMY,INDORE, M.P. vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, NFAC, DELHI, THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, NFAC, DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyaniakshay Academy Ito, Nfac 32 Kaimaidan Road, Delhi Khasgi Gagicha Vs. Indore (Appellant / Assessee) (Respondent/ Revenue) Pan: Aadta8987B Assessee By Shri S.N. Agrawal, Ar Revenue By Shri Ram Kumar Yadav, Cit- Dr Date Of Hearing 06.08.2024 Date Of Pronouncement 20.08.2024

charitable trust. Sections 12A and 12AA detail the procedural requirements for making an application to claim exemptions under sections 11 and 12 by the assessee and the grant or rejection of such application by the commissioner. Thus, in my view, sections 12A and 12AA are only procedural in nature. Hence, it is not the registration u/s 12AA by itself that

DIVYASDHANA CHARITALLE TRUST,INDORE vs. THE CIT (E) CIRCLE , BHOPAL

Appeals are allowed in terms indicated above

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

3 to section 80G and provides that if the expenditure of religious nature does not exceed 5%, the trust shall be deemed to be covered u/s 80G(5). Therefore, the assessee could Page 7 of 12 Divya Sadhana Charitable Trust, Indore. Vs. CIT(E), ITA No.138 & 139/Ind/2023 very well incur expenditure on religious nature upto 5% and still remain entitled

DIVYASDHANA CHARITALLE TRUST,INDORE vs. THE CIT (E) CIRCLE , BHOPAL

Appeals are allowed in terms indicated above

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

3 to section 80G and provides that if the expenditure of religious nature does not exceed 5%, the trust shall be deemed to be covered u/s 80G(5). Therefore, the assessee could Page 7 of 12 Divya Sadhana Charitable Trust, Indore. Vs. CIT(E), ITA No.138 & 139/Ind/2023 very well incur expenditure on religious nature upto 5% and still remain entitled

SHREE SHANTANU VIDHYAPEETH SOCIETY ,INDORE, M.P. vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, NFAC, DELHI, DELHI

Appeal is allowed for statistical purpose

charitable trust. Sections\n12A and 12AA detail the procedural requirements for\nmaking an application to claim exemptions under sections\n11 and 12 by the assessee and the grant or rejection of\nsuch application by the commissioner. Thus, in my\nview, sections 12A and 12AA are only procedural in\nnature. Hence, it is not the registration u/s 12AA by itself\nthat

M/S RAJIV GANDHI PROUDYOGIK VISHWAVIDHALYA,BHOPAL vs. CIT EXEMPTION, BHOPAL

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Manish Boradassessment Year: Na (12Aa)

3), where a trust or an institution has been granted registration under clause (b) of sub-section (1) or has obtained registration at any time under section 12A [as it stood before its amendment by the Finance (No.2) Act, 1996 (33 of 1996)] and subsequently it is noticed that the activities of the trust or the institution are being carried

MAHAVIR KUND KUND KAHAN TRUST,BARHANPUR vs. CIT(E) BHOPAL, BHOPAL

Bench: Shri Mahavir Prasad & Shri B.M. Biyani

charitable purposes. The decisions referred to by the learned counsel for the assessee squarely apply to this case. The findings of the CIT that the provisions of section 13(1)(b) apply to the assessee-trust is, therefore, set aside.” Ld. AR also made an alternative submission that even otherwise section 13(1)(b), which denies exemption u/s 11

CIT(E),BHOPAL, BHOPAL vs. SHRI MAHAVIR KUND KUND TRUST, UJJAIN

Bench: Shri Mahavir Prasad & Shri B.M. Biyani

charitable purposes. The decisions referred to by the learned counsel for the assessee squarely apply to this case. The findings of the CIT that the provisions of section 13(1)(b) apply to the assessee-trust is, therefore, set aside.” Ld. AR also made an alternative submission that even otherwise section 13(1)(b), which denies exemption u/s 11

M/S. ARIHANT CHERITABLE TRUST,INDORE vs. THE ITO (TDS)-1, INDORE

In the result, we find no force in the ground of the Revenue, hence dismissed

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Manish Boradassessment Year:2015-16

Charitable Trust Indore /ITANo.909/2019 and disposal of waste by these two companies cannot be said to be in the nature of technical, managerial or consultancy services as envisaged in Section 194J of the IT Act. I, therefore, hold that the ACIT(TDS) Circle, Baroda is not correct in holding the view that the services rendered by above two companies