BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

9 results for “capital gains”+ Section 80p(2)(d)clear

Sorted by relevance

Bangalore176Mumbai102Panaji70Raipur50Delhi47Pune32Cochin29Hyderabad28Chennai27Visakhapatnam24Kolkata24Ahmedabad21Jaipur19Lucknow18Chandigarh12Surat12Indore9Nagpur8Telangana5Rajkot4Cuttack4Karnataka3Varanasi3Kerala3Amritsar3SC3

Key Topics

Section 80P17Section 80P(2)(a)14Section 143(3)12Section 36(1)(viia)9Section 80P(2)(d)8Section 1478Deduction8Addition to Income6Section 36(1)(viii)

M/S NANDA NAGAR SAHKARI SAKH SANTHA,INDORE vs. THE ITO 3(3), INDORE

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is

ITA 1054/IND/2016[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Indore03 Aug 2018AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Manish Boradassessment Year: 2006-07 M/S Nanda Nagar Ito-3(3) Sahkari Sakh Sanstha Range-3 बनाम/ C/O M. Mehta & Co., Indore Vs. 11/5, South Tukoganj, Indore (Appellant) (Revenue ) P.A. No.Aaaan1784B

Section 143(3)Section 6Section 80P(2)(a)

D E R PER KUL BHARAT, J.M: This appeal is filed by the assessee against the order of Commissioner of Income Tax (appeals)-I, Indore, dated Nanda Nagar Sahkari Sanstha 14.07.2016 pertaining to the A.Y. 2006-07. The assessee has raised following grounds of appeal: 1. That on the facts and in the circumstances of the case

SIDDHLAXMI SAKH SAHAKARITA MY,,INDORE vs. ITO (EXEMPTION) W,INDORE, INDORE

ITA 131/IND/2020[2016-17]Status: Disposed
5
Disallowance5
Section 2633
Exemption2
ITAT Indore
14 Oct 2022
AY 2016-17

Bench: Ms. Madhumita Roy & Shri Bhagirath Mal Biyani

For Appellant: Shri Jai Kumar Jain, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Ashish Porwal, Sr.D.R
Section 143(3)Section 80PSection 80P(2)(a)

D E R PER Ms. MADHUMITA ROY - JM: The instant appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order dated 06.12.2019 passed by the Commissioner of Income-Tax (Appeals)-II, Indore (in short ‘CIT(A)’), arising out of the order dated 24.12.2018 passed by the Income Tax Officer (Exemption), Indore under section 143(3) of the Income

M. P POLICE SAKH SAHKARI SANSTHA MARYADIT UJJAIN,UJJAIN vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER -2(1), UJJAIN

In the result appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 192/IND/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Indore28 Feb 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Manish Boradm.P. Police Sakh Sahakari Ito 2(1), Sanstha Maryadit, Ujjain 32Nd Battalion, Vs. Dewas Road Nagari, Ujjain (Appellant / Assessee) (Respondent/ Revenue) Pan: Aabam5551C Assessee By Shri Milind Wadhwani, Ar Revenue By Shri Ashish Porwal, Sr.Dr Date Of Hearing 27.02.2025 Date Of Pronouncement 28.02.2025 O R D E R

Section 143(3)Section 80P

d) by the AO is that the surplus funds deposited in bank account would partake character of 'Income from other sources' but not 'income from business'. We have perused the case laws as relied by the Ld. Counsel for the assessee. The Hon'ble Karnataka High Court in the case of Guttigedarara Credit Co- operative Society Ltd. Vs. ITO (supra

INDORE MANDAL DAK TAR KARAMCHARI SAHAKARI SANSTHA MY. INDORE,INDORE vs. THE ADDITIONAL CIT , INDORE

In the result, appeal of assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 97/IND/2023[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Indore22 Jun 2023AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyaniindore Mandal Dak Tar Acit Karamchari Sahakari Indore Vs. Sanstha Maryadit Dewas (Appellant / Assessee) (Respondent/ Revenue) Pan: Aaaji 0159 C Assessee By Shri Venus Rawka, Ar Revenue By Shri Ashish Porwal, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 12.06.2023 Date Of Pronouncement 22.06.2023

Section 142(1)Section 80P

capital, if not immediately required to be lent to the members, if deposit this amount in bank account then the interest income is attributable to the profits and gains of the business of providing credit facilities to its members and eligible for deduction u/s 80P of the Act. 7. He has submitted that the issue before the Hon’ble Supreme

M/S M.P. STATE COOPERATIVE HOUSING FEDERATION SOCIETY,BHOPAL vs. THE ACIT 1(1), BHOPAL

In the result, the appeal of the revenue and the appeal of the assessee fail and are dismissed

ITA 1051/IND/2016[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Indore27 Mar 2017AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri C.M. Garg & Shri O.P. Meena

Section 143(3)Section 80PSection 80P(2)(a)

D E R PER SHRI O.P. MEENA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER These are cross-appeals filed by the Revenue and the assessee against the order of ld. Commissioner of Income tax (Appeals)-I, Bhopal [hereinafter referred to as the CIT (A)] dated 29.7.2016. This appeal pertains to Assessment Year 2013-14 as against appeal decided in respect of assessment order dated

INCOME TAX OFFICER, UJJAIN vs. M.P. POLICE SAKH SAHAKARI SANSTHA MARYADIT, UJJAIN

In the result, the appeals of the revenue are dismissed

ITA 173/IND/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Indore12 Jul 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(2)(d)

Gains of Business and Profession” and therefore, is eligible for claiming deduction u/s 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Act. The Board has decided that no appeal may be filed on this ground by the officers of the Department and the appeals already filed, if any, on this ground before the Courts/Tribunal may be withdrawn/nor pressed upon. Thus

INCOME TAX OFFICER, UJJAIN vs. M.P. POLICE SAKH SHAKARI SANSTHA MARYADIT, UJJAIN

In the result, the appeals of the revenue are dismissed

ITA 174/IND/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Indore12 Jul 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(2)(d)

Gains of Business and Profession” and therefore, is eligible for claiming deduction u/s 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Act. The Board has decided that no appeal may be filed on this ground by the officers of the Department and the appeals already filed, if any, on this ground before the Courts/Tribunal may be withdrawn/nor pressed upon. Thus

SEWA SAHKARI SAMMITTEE MARYADIT,BEED, MUNDI KHANDWA vs. PCIT-1, INDORE

In the result, appeal by the assesse is allowed

ITA 44/IND/2022[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Indore30 Oct 2023AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyanisewa Sahkari Sammittee Pr. Cit-2 Maryadit Beed Indore Vs. Beed Mundi Khandwa (Appellant / Assessee) (Revenue) Pan: Aaufs0703N Assessee By Shri Gagan Tiwari, Ar Revenue By Ms. Simran Bhullar, Cit-Dr Date Of Hearing 05.10.2023 Date Of Pronouncement 30.10.2023

Section 12ASection 138Section 143(3)Section 263

80P is allowed and return income of the assessee society is accepted. Total income Assessed u/s 143(3) of Income Tax Act, 1961 = Rs. - Nil- . 12. It is manifest from the record as well as voluminous documents filed by the assesse before the AO that it is not a case of complete lack of inquiry on the part

M/S JILA SAHAKARI KENDRIYA BANK MARYADIT,MANDSAUR vs. THE DCIT, RATLAM

In the result Ground No.1 & 2 raised by the

ITA 386/IND/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Indore17 Aug 2018AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Manish Boradassessment Year: 2012-13 Jila Sahakari Kendriya Dcit, Ratlam Bank Maryadit, Vs. Mhow-Neemuch Road, Mandsaur (M.P) (Appellant) (Respondent ) Pan No.Aaatj2383F Revenue By Shri Lalchand, Cit Assessee By Shri S.S. Deshpande,Ca Date Of Hearing 25.7.2018 Date Of 17.8.2018 Pronouncement

Section 143(3)Section 36(1)(viia)Section 36(1)(viii)

80P; 7[(vii) "non-banking financial company" shall have the meaning assigned to it in clause (f) of section 45-I of the Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934 (2 of 1934);] Section 36(1)(viii) in respect of any special reserve created and maintained by a specified entity, an amount not exceeding twenty per cent of the profits derived