M/S JILA SAHAKARI KENDRIYA BANK MARYADIT,MANDSAUR vs. THE DCIT, RATLAM

In the result Ground No.1 & 2 raised by the

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Manish Boradassessment Year: 2012-13 Jila Sahakari Kendriya Dcit, Ratlam Bank Maryadit, Vs. Mhow-Neemuch Road, Mandsaur (M.P) (Appellant) (Respondent ) Pan No.Aaatj2383F Revenue By Shri Lalchand, Cit Assessee By Shri S.S. Deshpande,Ca Date Of Hearing 25.7.2018 Date Of 17.8.2018 Pronouncement

4) of section 80P; 7[(vii) "non-banking financial company" shall have the meaning assigned to it in clause (f) of section 45-I of the Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934 (2 of 1934);] Section 36(1)(viii) in respect of any special reserve created and maintained by a specified entity, an amount not exceeding twenty per cent

M. P POLICE SAKH SAHKARI SANSTHA MARYADIT UJJAIN,UJJAIN vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER -2(1), UJJAIN

In the result appeal of the assessee is dismissed

Bench: Shri Manish Boradm.P. Police Sakh Sahakari Ito 2(1), Sanstha Maryadit, Ujjain 32Nd Battalion, Vs. Dewas Road Nagari, Ujjain (Appellant / Assessee) (Respondent/ Revenue) Pan: Aabam5551C Assessee By Shri Milind Wadhwani, Ar Revenue By Shri Ashish Porwal, Sr.Dr Date Of Hearing 27.02.2025 Date Of Pronouncement 28.02.2025 O R D E R

capital, if not immediately required to be lent to the members, the society cannot keep the said amount idle. If they deposit this amount in bank so as 7 M.P. Police Sakh Sahakari Sanstha Maryadit– A.Y 2020-21 to earn interest, the said interest income is attributable to the profits and gains of the business of providing credit facilities

SEWA SAHKARI SAMMITTEE MARYADIT,BEED, MUNDI KHANDWA vs. PCIT-1, INDORE

In the result, appeal by the assesse is allowed

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyanisewa Sahkari Sammittee Pr. Cit-2 Maryadit Beed Indore Vs. Beed Mundi Khandwa (Appellant / Assessee) (Revenue) Pan: Aaufs0703N Assessee By Shri Gagan Tiwari, Ar Revenue By Ms. Simran Bhullar, Cit-Dr Date Of Hearing 05.10.2023 Date Of Pronouncement 30.10.2023

80P is allowed and return income of the assessee society is accepted. Total income Assessed u/s 143(3) of Income Tax Act, 1961 = Rs. - Nil- . 12. It is manifest from the record as well as voluminous documents filed by the assesse before the AO that it is not a case of complete lack of inquiry on the part

INDORE MANDAL DAK TAR KARAMCHARI SAHAKARI SANSTHA MY. INDORE,INDORE vs. THE ADDITIONAL CIT , INDORE

In the result, appeal of assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyaniindore Mandal Dak Tar Acit Karamchari Sahakari Indore Vs. Sanstha Maryadit Dewas (Appellant / Assessee) (Respondent/ Revenue) Pan: Aaaji 0159 C Assessee By Shri Venus Rawka, Ar Revenue By Shri Ashish Porwal, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 12.06.2023 Date Of Pronouncement 22.06.2023

capital, if not immediately required to be lent to the members, if deposit this amount in bank account then the interest income is attributable to the profits and gains of the business of providing credit facilities to its members and eligible for deduction u/s 80P of the Act. 7. He has submitted that the issue before the Hon’ble Supreme

M/S M.P. STATE COOPERATIVE HOUSING FEDERATION SOCIETY,BHOPAL vs. THE ACIT 1(1), BHOPAL

In the result, the appeal of the revenue and the appeal of the assessee fail and are dismissed

Bench: Shri C.M. Garg & Shri O.P. Meena

80P(2) of the Income tax Act. The assessee carriedthe matter in appeal before the CIT(A). The CIT(A) following the decision of the ITAT in assessee’s own case for the assessment year 2003-04, held that the assessee isentitled to deduction u/s.80P on interest income received by it from banks other than co-operative bank. The Assessing

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, BHOPAL vs. MADHYA PRADESH RAJYA SAHAKARI ANUSUCHIT JATI VITT EVAM VIKAS NIGAM, BHOPAL

Appeal is allowed for statistical purpose

section 80P of the IT Act, 1961 and\nallowing the appeal of the assessee, thereby deleting the penalty u/s\n271(1)(c) of Rs.1,75,00,000/-, when inaccurate particulars of income are\nclearly apparent from the return of income filed and the submissions of the\nassessee during the penalty proceedings?\"\n2. The background facts leading to present appeal

INCOME TAX OFFICER, UJJAIN vs. M.P. POLICE SAKH SHAKARI SANSTHA MARYADIT, UJJAIN

In the result, the appeals of the revenue are dismissed

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

Gains of Business and Profession” and therefore, is eligible for claiming deduction u/s 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Act. The Board has decided that no appeal may be filed on this ground by the officers of the Department and the appeals already filed, if any, on this ground before the Courts/Tribunal may be withdrawn/nor pressed upon. Thus

INCOME TAX OFFICER, UJJAIN vs. M.P. POLICE SAKH SAHAKARI SANSTHA MARYADIT, UJJAIN

In the result, the appeals of the revenue are dismissed

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

Gains of Business and Profession” and therefore, is eligible for claiming deduction u/s 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Act. The Board has decided that no appeal may be filed on this ground by the officers of the Department and the appeals already filed, if any, on this ground before the Courts/Tribunal may be withdrawn/nor pressed upon. Thus