SHASHI PRABHA SINGHANIA,NEEMUCH vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER NEEMUCH, NEEMUCH

Appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose

capital gains. The assessee also claimed deductions under Chapter VI-A, including for 80C and 80D, and had brought forward losses from house property. The original return was revised, and a notice under Section

SHRI LAV NARANG,UJJAIN vs. PCIT,, UJJAIN

Bench: Shri Mahavir Prasad & Shri Manish Boradvirtual Hearing Assessment Year: 2015-16

capital gain and income from other source and after claiming the deduction u/s 80C of the Act total income has been shown at Rs. 49,15,731/- whereas surprisingly on looking to the assessment order dated 30.12.2017 we find that the assessment has been completed only by estimating 10 Shri Lav Nagrang the income @10% on the turnover disclosed

LATE SHRI RAMANAND TAPARIA TH/LH CHANDA DEVI TAPARIA,INDORE vs. NATIONAL FACELESS ASSESSMENT CENTRE, DELHI

Appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical\npurpose

gain of Rs 2,30,820/- which\nwas declared nil by the return filed in response to the notice u/s\n148 of the Act. However the assessee made no submission\n/explanation this regard, therefore the same is also added to the\ntotal income of the assessee for the year under consideration as\nincome from STCG.\nAddition (STCG

LATE SHRI RAMANAND TAPARIA TH/LH CHANDADEVI TAPARIA ,INDORE vs. NATIONAL FACELESS ASSESSMENT CENTREQ, DELHI

Appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical\npurpose

gain of Rs 2,30,820/- which\nwas declared nil by the return filed in response to the notice u/s\n148 of the Act. However the assessee made no submission\n/explanation this regard, therefore the same is also added to the\ntotal income of the assessee for the year under consideration as\nincome from STCG.\nAddition (STCG

ASHOK KUMAR MOONAT,RATLAM vs. ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL-3), INDORE, INDORE

80C & 80D.\n(iv)\nNow, the assessee has come in next appeal before us.\n3.\nThe grounds raised by assessee are as under:\n“1. That the learned Commissioner of Income tax (A) further erred in law in\nnot appreciating the fact that the gold ornaments and jewellery found as\nexcess stock over and above the books of the accounts